WOW...
you have just revealed your thought process haven't you?
So now we get to your true perspective. And boy is it a doozy. You no longer claim that
the law is the shared common morals or ethics of a community, democratically agreed upon, but is merely the wishes whatever they may be, of a certain class of men, whom we do not know.
What is right and what is wrong for people in your group, is not a function of conscience, or ethics, or morals but is determined solely by what some men tell you. In your world view, doing what is right is merely doing what you are told or commanded, and doing wrong means not doing what you are told. You have abandoned ALL claim to higher moral ground, and even your own humanity. You are not a man, you are a dog. You do not have equals, you have masters.
I think now I see why you so vehemently oppose this movement. It is for people who have a conscience, who have their own set of morals, and ethics, and do not need others to tell them right from wrong. That is not you. It was you who once claimed that if not for the Criminal Code you would commit murder, did you not?
You are clearly a sociopath, and can justify your sociopathy by claiming you were just doing what you were told. That is why you so staunchly defend the status quo and look at your actions against your fellowman as mere light hearted relief.
I have never been happier to not be someone in my life, or happier to know I do not think like someone else does. I have pity for you. Right and wrong for you, is not a function of any internal decision making at all. Someone failed miserably in raising you. You are a puppet on strings pulled by others, and lack the ability to formulate a course of action based upon what you feel is right and wrong, and have to rely upon others to tell you what is acceptable, or not.
if right and wrong is merely a function of doing what you are told, as you claim, then someone somewhere up the chain of command must be deciding what is okay and not, and that decision is not based upon doing what they are told at all. People like you, willing to do anything they are ordered to do, and who take following orders as the height of morally correct behaviour are a far greater danger to the people, than folks like me, who choose to follow their own morals. At least we have morals. All you have is an ability to do what you are told. Must be nice, not having to actually think about right and wrong, and being able to abdicate responsibility for your actions by claiming you were just following orders.
I wonder, how did that defense work out historically?
