the speed & symmetry in the destruction of wtc 1,2 &7
None of the collapses were symmetrical. You yourself had to re-define the word to try and force it to fit WTC7. The speeds are deliberately misrepresented by truthers; in particular, the statement that WTC7 collapsed in less than seven seconds is a lie.
Has nothing to do with any conspiracy theory. Long-lasting undersground fires are completely explained by the conventional narrative.
Anecdotal evidence at best, with no physical evidence to substantiate it.
A common product of normal fires, and also from many other sources that could have been present at the WTC. And, incidentally, it's even a lie that they wer "iron" microspheres; even Harrit and Jones only describe them as "iron
rich", which means that they include other elements. For the implications of that, I suggest you learn some basic chemistry.
temperatures recorded weeks later at the surface hot enough to melt aluminum. (the hottest temp was about a week later 2800f at the surface recorded by Bechtel)
All completely understood in terms of the conventional narrative.
explosions all over the place
All completely understood in terms of the conventional narrative.
A fantasy concocted by conspiracy theorists with no basis in reality whatsoever. The word doesn't even mean what conspiracy theorists think it means. Some debris-laden air was expelled from windows during the collapse, which is completely understood in terms of the conventional narrative.
Not a fact. They didn't explode.
which disassembled the superstructures, pulverized tons of concrete,
Ask Steven Jones about that. Most of the concrete, by his admission, was in quite large pieces.
left 1100 human beings blasted to bits so small no trace of their dna could be found.
Another lie. Have you forgotten the 100 day fires so quickly?
And created pyrcolatsic clouds,
Outright fantasy. You don't even know what the word means.
From 1600 foot buildings. Not exactly surprising.
200 dna tests matched a single person.
So?
Again, fantasy. It didn't "implode".
Evidence ignored by investigators who did not even test for explosives.
The debris was fingertip searched at Fresh Kills. Evidence of explosive devices would have been found.
Hi-tech thermtic material found in the dust.
A lie made up by Harrit et al and contradicted by their own results.
To paraphrase a famous comment, everything you have posted is either factual or relevant; unfortunately, the relevant parts are not factual, and the factual parts are not relevant. You're living in a fantasy world, where you believe the fabrications of liars because they're what you want to believe.
Dave
