Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
FreemanMenard said:
There is law which governs us all, regardless of our status.
Click to expand...
Yes. Here's where you can find most of them, with the exception of Municipal bylaws:

www.canlii.org


There is statutes which governs those who are legally speaking holding the status of 'child of the province'.
Click to expand...
There is no such status.

I escape those by acting like an adult, and claiming my right to do so.
Click to expand...
No. You do not.

Those who cannot distinguish, are still 'children of the province', and likely will always be, and thus will always be bound by those rules. Sad for them.
Click to expand...
The laws of Canada apply to you, to me, and to all of us, including those who make the laws, those who write the laws, those who interpret the laws, and those who enforce the laws.

Anything else is the divine right of kings or some other bogus assertion of authority rather than the rule of law.
 
Remember, we're dealing with someone who believes in magic words....
Click to expand...

It's not that he believes in magic words, he just can't understand simple English ones and so, like all FOTL-Wafflers, invents new meanings for them.

When I say "invent" I, of course, mean "falling for and parroting an age old scam"
 
Anything else is the divine right of kings or some other bogus assertion of authority rather than the rule of law.
Click to expand...
Makes me think of our princes's speeding tickets. :D

(Two princes driving wildly, not one princess.)
 
Toke said:
Makes me think of our princes's speeding tickets. :D

(Two princes driving wildly, not one princess.)
Click to expand...
FOTL = spoiled, useless twats?

Sounds about right.

(Apologies to any Danish Monarchists out there)
 
FreemanMenard said:
Have you ever explained how you can govern another without consent and not abandon the rule of law?
Click to expand...
Are you addressing this question to the King? No? Then please stop this idiotic sophistry and get busy backing up your claims with evidence.
 
Last edited:
As for class, dude, you have been stalking me for two years! You asked to be my friend on FB for that reason alone! You are one to talk about class eh?
Click to expand...

I am your friend on facebook, Im not only JB as well you know.;)
I even have a photo of myself on my profile :eek: so you know who I am
hehehe
 
uk_dave said:
And yet you're not allowed to represent anyone in a court in Canada.
Click to expand...
Minor correction. He's not allowed to represent anyone in British Columbia. Each province in Canada has its own law society. The joys of federalism.

This could explain why he has recently fled BC.
 
D'rok said:
FOTL = spoiled, useless twats?

Sounds about right.

(Apologies to any Danish Monarchists out there)
Click to expand...

One of them actually completed the navy assault diver course* and must have some ability. The other/both excels at the traditional royal sport of drinking and whoring.


*seal or some such.
 
D'rok said:
Minor correction. He's not allowed to represent anyone in British Columbia. Each province in Canada has its own law society. The joys of federalism.
Click to expand...

English people are good at forgetting the UK home nations have different legal systems, so what are their chances of remembering that Canada does likewise for the provinces? ;)

I'm just amazed that Rob here hasn't made an argument that, in Scots Constituional Law, the people are recognised as sovereign and hence he can apply his FoTL theories without hesitation! Alas, one might easily argument that the will of the people is thus binding and the law is indeed compulsory......
 
FreemanMenard said:
Statutes are closer to contracts then you imagine. They have been described as 'the terms of a societal contract' by those you would call experts in the law.
And just like contracts, they even require consent to be enacted. Read the enabling clause in the statutes here in Canada. Why do you find the word 'consent' right in it, if consent is not required for them to be deemed as having the force of law? Hmmm?:rolleyes:
Click to expand...


I'll ask this again, since you seem to have missed it the first time: whose consent is it that is mentioned in the statutes?
 
Architect said:
English people are good at forgetting the UK home nations have different legal systems, so what are their chances of remembering that Canada does likewise for the provinces? ;)

I'm just amazed that Rob here hasn't made an argument that, in Scots Constituional Law, the people are recognised as sovereign and hence he can apply his FoTL theories without hesitation! Alas, one might easily argument that the will of the people is thus binding and the law is indeed compulsory......
Click to expand...
Well, if you believe what you read on the FOTL Interwebs, apparently the UCC (which isn't even actually law in the USA - it's just a recommendation on harmonization) and Black's Law dictionary are sources of law in Canada and the UK, so I guess anything is possible in FOTL-land!
 
In the words of former member Bob haulk

The world works like this,
You can do whatever you like, but if other people don't like what you're doing they will stop you.

Perfect. :)
 
Mojo said:
I'll ask this again, since you seem to have missed it the first time: whose consent is it that is mentioned in the statutes?
Click to expand...
Follow-up question in Westminster Civics 101:

What does "Responsible Government" mean a) generally, and b) specifically with respect to the relationship between the Crown and the Legislature?
 
'm just amazed that Rob here hasn't made an argument that, in Scots Constituional Law, the people are recognised as sovereign and hence he can apply his FoTL theories without hesitation!
Click to expand...

I beg to differ. I live in Scotland and am fully aware of the real law versus the myths.

ETA: I need to know the differences between Real Law and bollocks because the bollocks affects my business.
Suffice to say, I am always proved right.

Without naming names, FOTL-Waffle Gurus are conmen.

Does Lance have internet access from his mental-ward?
 
Last edited:
Reminded of the plight of poor Lance Thatcher, I was pondering Menards video here.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=436798682226252164

Dont waste your time watching all of it, it's the same nonsense,just skip to 1hr 32 and 30 seconds.
Its Rob taking the urine out of a schizophrenic man on the street, hell it makes great video and shows exactly what lengths Rob will go to using exploitation in the name of entertainment .
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom