Now the footprints are these then in consulting Rinaldi and Bohemia it is said: "footprints imprinted deposition of blood substance" but how do you say that the fingerprints were impressed by deposition of substance blood, we can say that those footprints are luminescent at luminol, we all know that the fingerprints that we ... are extremely varied other materials that become luminescent luminol, Sarah spoke to me of a funny case, perhaps she wanted to talk about but there was one case in our part of the luminescent luminol footprints that have given problems in the course of an investigation (inc .) blood and not blood, it is also clear that it was ... because they were small because otherwise you could not possibly understand that they were the footprints of the child who had gone swimming in the pool and that it was taking out the dirty feet of chlorine had left all this walk, now I guess if those footsteps were not a child how many experts would have made measurements of the Scientific Police and were likely written for the deposition of blood substance. Goodness does not add that ... 1 in the survey was pulled out of the DNA, in the survey no 7, now with this
luminescence is hard to imagine that it would not be pulled out of the DNA, is a strong luminescence, the first would be appropriate to perhaps make a specific diagnosis of blood but then speak of these things connect. Then we have the impression taken at the plantar Amanda Knox and relief 1 luminol, Bohemia and th_ experts speak Rinaldi I think in this case likely identity, now first of all be aware that literature is not always advisable to make an impression, but only different position, I do not know if in this case has been made because the impression can change depending on the attitude of the foot, an external pressure, internal, and so on but I am not an expert on fingerprints, and can tell you, even measurements I know we discussed the fact that the measures also had been wrong consistently, I would point out that there are no trade these metrics luminescent strips that are made specifically to be put right next to the findings of interest to be photographed with luminol as a reference metric precision and then work on photographs, is longer, is shorter and has a photo taken sideways so it is difficult to reach then a matter of some interest but above all this I ask myself, these gentlemen have made a sea of calculations , I have now read a bit 'of literature on these things but here I did not ... not a matter of reading the literature, it is clear that Amanda has this foot let's call the second index finger of the foot to make themselves more understandable than longus, the impression the second finger is shorter frankly, the impression with luminol, be Amanda's foot that its mark has inked a long second toe, with that luminol was there with shorter second toes, on this I would say that it rains there. Now I'm not a particular fingerprint expert but if there is one thing that catches your eye when we know that most people have the second longest finger of the big however, there has a good share
shorter I do not think it would be silly to take the fingerprints of other young men who frequented the house and that potentially had walked with bare feet coming out of the shower that perhaps maybe it was washed with chlorine for cleaning and may have left fingerprint luminol positive everywhere. I do not want to say but unfortunately I have no precise image, the only other foot as I can see is that the victim, here there is no image that you see well but if I have to say the foot of the victim who seems to invite the pictures of feet of victim available to learn it, it would seem to have shorter second fingers, you can not say because this is slightly flexed, this is to say that the victim may very well one day before, two days before having a shower and made he pounded the floor and leaving a positive imprint with luminol. Attention will discuss the links but the fact that there is the DNA of Amanda down there has absolutely no meaning in the sense of being allowed to relate the luminescence of luminol with the presence of DNA in the house where a person lives is normal there is, I do not say, but almost everywhere. Probable identity, also apply here the same things, even for the second stamp is clearly seen that here there is no trace of the long second toe. Here, about the likely identity of this fact they are talking about these people exist, you just described ... ENS has agreed, among other things is described in a recent Italian text of 2009 which was attended also intimately that it seems to me that the manager of the Scientific Police, I know little of environments Police do not know the grades, does not I know they are called, however identification, this is for shoes, but be careful ... and there is no similar criteria in respect of footprints, however the concept is of a general nature, I say that there is an identity when the terms of comparison
have the same general features and details. Probable identification, this is what our Scientific Police say but be careful to talk about probable identification is a clear match of design and form in the absence of significant differences as a coincidence of the general features or some marks of wear also must be fulfilled at least one of the following criteria are observable marks, what is a tag? In forensic medicine we study the characteristics and markings, the features are the blue eyes, brown hair, are part of the kit are the anatomical characteristics of each man and therefore may have some value to identify a person, I can say that with the hair blond and blue eyes, and the marks are something abnormal, have a tattoo, have an amputation of a finger, are a wound, are a particular surgery, these prints here is to arrive at a probable ... to have an identity must be equal, to have a likely identity must still have the marks or traceable to the batch and then speaks of shoe marks or causal for example, I once walked on the nails and me are full of holes or there is a clear agreement in the specific wear marks then can not be defined, and so on, however, is all. Be careful even with regard to ... I'm almost done, with regard to the luminol literature insists that the luminol spreads easily and can alter the design of fingerprints.
