• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Reasonable doubt...All truthers(and whoever esle) please read

I just want to make a quick post. The few posts above this are just spin, and they know it.

But I want to quickly talk about Remote control aircraft. Anything I say on that subject is pure speculation on my part. I don't know how it was done. I have some ideas. Those airplanes somehow could have been switched with modified tankers. The POD could have been added at the airport. I mean there's a couple of ways it could have happened. Anything I would suggest is pure speculation. Believe it or not I don't like to deal with speculation. If you notice the OP the only mention of planes was the -.25 for the strange response from Boeing (again not implicating Boeing at all) It seems to me if there was nothing strange about the A/C why not just say it?

But if it was a conspiracy, those planes were not piloted by human hands. There's no way such an important part would have been left to that. The pilots could miss their targets, they could loose the nerve...many things could happen. There is no way such an important part would have been left in human hands. Again how it was done (assuming it was done) is just a matter of speculation on my part.
 
tmd2_1 said:
I just want to make a quick post. The few posts above this are just spin, and they know it.

But I want to quickly talk about Remote control aircraft. Anything I say on that subject is pure speculation on my part. I don't know how it was done. I have some ideas. Those airplanes somehow could have been switched with modified tankers. The POD could have been added at the airport. I mean there's a couple of ways it could have happened. Anything I would suggest is pure speculation. Believe it or not I don't like to deal with speculation. If you notice the OP the only mention of planes was the -.25 for the strange response from Boeing (again not implicating Boeing at all) It seems to me if there was nothing strange about the A/C why not just say it?

But if it was a conspiracy, those planes were not piloted by human hands. There's no way such an important part would have been left to that. The pilots could miss their targets, they could loose the nerve...many things could happen. There is no way such an important part would have been left in human hands. Again how it was done (assuming it was done) is just a matter of speculation on my part.
Click to expand...

Where do people come up with such nonsense?

:dl:
 
The few posts above this are just spin, and they know it.
Click to expand...

You think some orange glowy stuff is enough to disprove the entire "official story" of 9/11 and you accuse us of "spin".

Why does my stove glow, tmd? Is it melting each time I cook something?

You're very good at evading.
 
tmd2_1 said:
I just want to make a quick post. The few posts above this are just spin, and they know it.

But I want to quickly talk about Remote control aircraft. Anything I say on that subject is pure speculation on my part. I don't know how it was done. I have some ideas. Those airplanes somehow could have been switched with modified tankers. The POD could have been added at the airport. I mean there's a couple of ways it could have happened. Anything I would suggest is pure speculation. Believe it or not I don't like to deal with speculation. If you notice the OP the only mention of planes was the -.25 for the strange response from Boeing (again not implicating Boeing at all) It seems to me if there was nothing strange about the A/C why not just say it?

But if it was a conspiracy, those planes were not piloted by human hands. There's no way such an important part would have been left to that. The pilots could miss their targets, they could loose the nerve...many things could happen. There is no way such an important part would have been left in human hands. Again how it was done (assuming it was done) is just a matter of speculation on my part.
Click to expand...

Why would you go out of your way to point out that there was nothing unusual about the aircraft? That is the expectation and doesn't need to be pointed out. When there's a car crash or any other aircraft crash have you noticed the manufacturers making statements about the normality of the vehicles involved?
 
tmd2_1 said:
I just want to make a quick post. The few posts above this are just spin, and they know it.

But I want to quickly talk about Remote control aircraft. Anything I say on that subject is pure speculation on my part. I don't know how it was done. I have some ideas. Those airplanes somehow could have been switched with modified tankers. The POD could have been added at the airport. I mean there's a couple of ways it could have happened. Anything I would suggest is pure speculation. Believe it or not I don't like to deal with speculation. If you notice the OP the only mention of planes was the -.25 for the strange response from Boeing (again not implicating Boeing at all) It seems to me if there was nothing strange about the A/C why not just say it?

But if it was a conspiracy, those planes were not piloted by human hands. There's no way such an important part would have been left to that. The pilots could miss their targets, they could loose the nerve...many things could happen. There is no way such an important part would have been left in human hands. Again how it was done (assuming it was done) is just a matter of speculation on my part.
Click to expand...

Wacky Inflatable Flailing Arm Tube Man is Flailing.

Again.

Another day, another 2 pages of wasted bandwidth.
 
NoahFence said:
Why then won't you listen to those of us who DO know how it was done?(IT being 9/11 of course)
Click to expand...

That's no fun!

The demand is a new investigation into what they don't know in order to prove to them that IT didn't happen the way they don't know.

Is that clear enough? even trying to sum up truthbot logic becomes convoluted.
 
tmd2_1 said:
I see nothing silver melting/dripping.
Click to expand...

Of course you don't. That isn't what I said either.

tmd2_1 said:
Again I find it hard to believe NIST would not have mentioned this.
Click to expand...

Should have they?

tmd2_1 said:
You should really contact them if you believe you have new evidence.
Click to expand...

Sure.

Hey NIST dudes, I magnified a screen grab of the Cazzaniga #46 video and it shows a glowing silver substance in the building. Could that possibly be aluminum melting?

NIST: Well let's have a look. We know a large aircraft had just crashed there roughly an hour ago and it looks as if there's a very hot fire burning around it. At this point I think we can safely conclude "No ****, Sherlock."

Thanks for the handwave though, usually you just ignore posts that make you uneasy.
 
tmd2_1 said:
The POD could have been added at the airport. I mean there's a couple of ways it could have happened. Anything I would suggest is pure speculation. .
Click to expand...


Pods again!

Look, there were no pods. Its a fringe claim even in the truth movement, like CGI no planers. Even truthers argue its nonsence, not even just nonsence but that the pod planes stuff was invented by the government to make truthers look bad! Thats how stupid you sound!
 
Edx said:
Pods again!

Look, there were no pods. Its a fringe claim even in the truth movement, like CGI no planers. Even truthers argue its nonsence, not even just nonsence but that the pod planes stuff was invented by the government to make truthers look bad! Thats how stupid you sound!
Click to expand...

i think even loose change dropped that claim.
 
Edx said:
Pods again!

Look, there were no pods. Its a fringe claim even in the truth movement, like CGI no planers. Even truthers argue its nonsence, not even just nonsence but that the pod planes stuff was invented by the government to make truthers look bad! Thats how stupid you sound!
Click to expand...

DC said:
i think even loose change dropped that claim.
Click to expand...

The below article gives a good summary of why I believe there is some doubt and there may have been a POD. Keep in mind that LaVanguardia is a mainstream paper in Spain. No CT at all.

"One morning last February a young reader came into the head offices of LaVanguardia.es with an idea in his head that had occurred to him as he was looking attentively at the videos and photos on 9/11.

There are reader/discoverers. They’re readers who get a chance to bring news out—provide their newspapers with an exclusive story. It is initiative which is gratefully received. These readers are efficient spontaneous reporters. That’s what’s happened in the case of the mystery of the plane which crashed into the WTC in new York on 11 September 2001."

Full article: http://www.amics21.com/911/ombudsman2.html


Edited to remove wholesale quote of article in violation of Rule 6. Do not repost copyrighted material wholesale. Excerpt a small portion and leave a link to the original work.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Loss Leader
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tmd2_1 said:
The below article gives a good summary of why I believe there is some doubt and there may have been a POD. Keep in mind that LaVanguardia is a mainstream paper in Spain. No CT at all.

"One morning last February a young reader came into the head offices of LaVanguardia.es with an idea in his head that had occurred to him as he was looking attentively at the videos and photos on 9/11.

There are reader/discoverers. They’re readers who get a chance to bring news out—provide their newspapers with an exclusive story. It is initiative which is gratefully received. These readers are efficient spontaneous reporters. That’s what’s happened in the case of the mystery of the plane which crashed into the WTC in new York on 11 September 2001."

Edited by Loss Leader: 
Lengthy quote from article removed.
Click to expand...

even back in my truther time i found the POD stuff laughable, and i was pretty much convinced of remote controlled planes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tmd2_1 said:
The below article gives a good summary of why I believe there is some doubt and there may have been a POD. Keep in mind that LaVanguardia is a mainstream paper in Spain. No CT at all.
Click to expand...

The "pod" is a visual effect derived from the natural contours of the aircraft and the livery.

tmd2_1 - sorry to say this so brutally but you are gullible.

767paintscheme.jpg


767-222befireimpact.jpg


767belly.jpg
 
GlennB hits the nail on the head. What do you say to his post TMD2_1? I can't believe people are actually this stupid, yet time and time again reality slaps my belief. Sad.
 
GlennB said:
The "pod" is a visual effect derived from the natural contours of the aircraft and the livery.

tmd2_1 - sorry to say this so brutally but you are gullible.

[qimg]http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg274/sap-guy/767paintscheme.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg274/sap-guy/767-222befireimpact.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg274/sap-guy/767belly.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Sunstealer said:
GlennB hits the nail on the head. What do you say to his post TMD2_1? I can't believe people are actually this stupid, yet time and time again reality slaps my belief. Sad.
Click to expand...

What do I have to say? Well the first thing is, see the article above, it sums it up. Next I'm still waiting for you to do anything to show the claims you make. Easy to write words, much harder to do experiments.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom