Reasonable doubt...All truthers(and whoever esle) please read

uke2se said:
Read my edit, please.

After that, please provide any scientific articles written by these "experts" on 911 that was published in a respected scientific journal. No, the Journal of 911 studies or whatever it's called is not such a journal, and no, Jones' thermite paper is not such an article, as it is 1, bogus, 2, not peer reviewed and 3, not published in a respected journal.

This challenge shouldn't be too hard to live up to, as we are constantly reminded of the 1500 people with letters after their names who are in Gage's little club.
Click to expand...

What scientific facts has NIST stuck to, that AE fir 911 truth not?
 
tmd2_1 said:
What scientific facts has NIST stuck to, that AE fir 911 truth not?
Click to expand...

Sorry, that's not an answer to my direct challenge. Try again:

Please show any peer-reviewed articles about 911 published in any respected scientific journals by any members of AE911Truth.
 
Animal said:
Credentials......i.e. licenses are granted for displaying minimum levels of knowledge.

I am a licensed architect (20+ years) with a NCARB certificate. Legally I can design any type structure, from a garage to a 110 story building. Am I qualified to design every type of structure ....... not at all. Do some licensed professionals think because they are licensed that they are qualified to design any structure......yes......and those are the runs to run away from.

the AE troofer crowd is composed of those type individuals.
Click to expand...

Some AE for truth have degrees from some of the best schools in the country, do they not? The same schools members of NIST have?
 
tmd2_1 said:
I don't think I did..some members have AE 911 truth are very well qualified
Click to expand...

What you think has no bearing on the fact that you missed his point completely.

Now, please provide any peer-reviewed articles on 911 posted in any respected scientific journals by any members of AE911Truth.
 
uke2se said:
Sorry, that's not an answer to my direct challenge. Try again:

Please show any peer-reviewed articles about 911 published in any respected scientific journals by any members of AE911Truth.
Click to expand...

Are there other reports besides NIST or FEMA?
 
tmd2_1 said:
I don't think I did..some members have AE 911 truth are very well qualified
Click to expand...

then they should have no problem puting together a theory and support it with evidence. wonder when that will happen.
 
tmd2_1 said:
Some AE for truth have degrees from some of the best schools in the country, do they not? The same schools members of NIST have?
Click to expand...

Irrelevant. Where one get's their degrees and what kind of grades they got while there is completely beside the point.

And could you kindly respond to this:

Mudcat said:
TMD I was not in New York the day that 9/11 happened. Like many of the people here old enough to remember the day in question I saw it on national television. And when someone told me what was going on my first reaction was to ask them "What action/disaster movie are they advertising?" It was that unbelievable.

I haven't seen any of the many reports into the events of that day, never looked at any evidence apart from the initial television reports.

I also never doubted the official reports because I seen the live television report and it was frigging obvious what was going on. What is so hard to accept about it?
Click to expand...
 
I've got bad news for our truther friend, not only do none of them have a peer-reviewed paper, but very few even have youtube videos. Instead, you get statements from one of the very few structural engineers on that list that mini-nukes took down the towers. And he was featured by Gage on his website!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom