• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Deeper than primes

Status
Not open for further replies.
jsfisher said:
This just in, Mathematics still works; doronetics, not so much.
Click to expand...
Traditional Mathematics is a "Death by Entropy Anti-Evolutionist" framework ,which is based almost only on the left-hemisphere of the mathematician's brain, and as a result the Mathematical Science is a context-dependent-only system that can't be developed by mutations of already agreed definitions\notions (as any real Evolution happens).

The dis-communication between Logic, Intuition and Ethics is the signature of the current Mathematical Science, and this science is going to be developed to the level of the organic nature of real complexity, which uses both brain's hemispheres and it is characterized by Cross-contexts AND Context-dependent reasoning, where Logic, Intuition and Ethics complement each other into a one comprehensive framework.

jsfisher, your currently agreed reasoning is too weak in order to get, for example, http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7415565&postcount=16120.
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
Traditional Mathematics is a "Death by Entropy Anti-Evolutionist" framework ,which is based almost only on the left-hemisphere of the mathematician's brain, and as a result the Mathematical Science is a context-dependent-only system that can't be developed by mutations of already agreed definitions\notions (as any real Evolution happens).

The dis-communication between Logic, Intuition and Ethics is the signature of the current Mathematical Science, and this science is going to be developed to the level of the organic nature of real complexity, which uses both brain's hemispheres and it is characterized by Cross-contexts AND Context-dependent reasoning, where Logic, Intuition and Ethics complement each other into a one comprehensive framework.

jsfisher, your currently agreed reasoning is too weak in order to get, for example, http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7415565&postcount=16120.
Click to expand...


Gibberish and nonlogic don't help doronetics to get any better. It still has no result of note, just contradictory, self-imagined, unsupported assertions.

On the other hand, Mathematics still works.
 
jsfisher said:
Gibberish and nonlogic don't help doronetics to get any better. It still has no result of note, just contradictory, self-imagined, unsupported assertions.

On the other hand, Mathematics still works.
Click to expand...
The current imbalanced left-hemisphere-only mathematical framework, is going to be developed into balanced left-hemisphere\right-hemisphere mathematical framework, no matter if the current imbalanced left-hemisphere-only mathematical framework agrees with it, or not.

For more details, please look, for example, at:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7333688&postcount=15831

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7333256&postcount=15827

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7333439&postcount=15829

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7397813&postcount=16048

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7399536&postcount=16058

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7394710&postcount=16037

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7376940&postcount=15989



As long as Comparison is impossible because of the imbalance of one's mind, new glasses will not help.

-----

B.T.W

A poster that reads the first row of your signature, can understand that you are quoting something that I said.

Please show where exactly I first said that.
 
Last edited:
Doron is very accommodating. Point out that some of his posts are contradictory nonsense and he writes...

doronshadmi said:
For more details, please look, for example, at:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7333688&postcount=15831

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7333256&postcount=15827

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7333439&postcount=15829

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7397813&postcount=16048

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7399536&postcount=16058

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7394710&postcount=16037

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7376940&postcount=15989
Click to expand...

Maybe some industrious soul would consider indexing these according to failing and subject area--possibly some sort of Dewey-decimal system for gibberish.


Oh, and I just checked: Mathematics still works.
 
Last edited:
jsfisher said:
Doron is very accommodating. Point out that some of his posts are contradictory nonsense and he writes...



Maybe some industrious soul would consider indexing these according to failing and subject area--possibly some sort of Dewey-decimal system for gibberish.


Oh, and I just checked: Mathematics still works.
Click to expand...

As long as Comparison is impossible because of the imbalance of one's left-hemisphere-only mind, new glasses will not help.

-----

A poster that reads the first row of your signature, can understand that you are quoting something that I said.

Please show where exactly I first said that.
 
doronshadmi said:
The current imbalanced left-hemisphere-only mathematical framework, is going to be developed into balanced left-hemisphere\right-hemisphere mathematical framework, no matter if the current imbalanced left-hemisphere-only mathematical framework agrees with it, or not.
Click to expand...
You got to be kidding yourself profusely. Can't you see how the traditional mathematics uses the left/right balance to avoid answering a straight question with a straight answer?

Your dogged insistence on 0.999... being the only numerical expression that describes a distinct magnitude will cause a problem when someone asks you a question whether 0.999... is a rational number or not. Actually it won't cause much of a problem, coz you simply ignore the question and won't answer it. But the traditional math can't afford such a level of ignorance and when it encounters a contradiction in the definition of rational numbers in this particular case, it will simply use the left/right balance to answer it:

0.999... = 1

The number on the left is identical to the number on the right, and since there is no contradiction regarding 1 being a rational number, 0.999... has been proven to be a rational number.

The plus side of your insistence is that you wouldn't have any problem to show that {a, b, c} satisfies the definition of a collection called the set when a = 0.999..., b = 1, c = 2.

S = {0.999... , 1, 2}

However, the traditional math wouldn't have much problem with that either: it simply chooses another set, like A = {1, 2, 3}, to play with. Just let that Axiom of Choice kick in, right? Lols.
 
jsfisher said:
I'm sorry, it's been so long since I've been on the elementary school playground. Is there where I'm supposed to say, "Am not!!" or "Are too!!"?
Click to expand...
Both answers are not going to change the fact that you are an one-eyed vision mind, which uses only his left-hemisphere in order to do Math, whether it is used at elementary school playground or some university.

-----

A poster that reads the first row of your signature, can understand that you are quoting something that I said.

Please show where exactly I first said that.
 
Last edited:
epix said:
You got to be kidding yourself profusely. Can't you see how the traditional mathematics uses the left/right balance to avoid answering a straight question with a straight answer?

Your dogged insistence on 0.999... being the only numerical expression that describes a distinct magnitude will cause a problem when someone asks you a question whether 0.999... is a rational number or not. Actually it won't cause much of a problem, coz you simply ignore the question and won't answer it. But the traditional math can't afford such a level of ignorance and when it encounters a contradiction in the definition of rational numbers in this particular case, it will simply use the left/right balance to answer it:

0.999... = 1

The number on the left is identical to the number on the right, and since there is no contradiction regarding 1 being a rational number, 0.999... has been proven to be a rational number.
Click to expand...
epix, your post is a good example of a mind which uses only its left hemisphere (the verbal\sequential one) in order to wrongly define left/right balance.

But real balance is actually done only by using both left (verbal\sequential) AND right (visual\spatial) brain's hemispheres.

So, epix, please try again to get out of your left (verbal\sequential) only current state of mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom