Molinaro
Illuminator
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2005
- Messages
- 4,781
Funny how you conveniently “forget” to mention that this was based on faulty numbers provided by the Bush administration and that unemployment was *already* over 8% and in fact had almost reached 9% when the Stimulus passed and was over 9% before stimulus money started to flow.
In fact as soon as Stimulus money did begin to flow GDP stopped declining and unemployment stopped increasing. This occurred almost immediacy, even though the recession had been going on for 19 months during which “doing nothing” had failed to have any positive effect.
(BTW, It’s actually quite understandable that the Bush numbers would be off given the nosedive the US economy took after credit markets froze when Leahman’s went under. It’s almost impossible for economic models to keep up with a crisis this bad.)
Waiting for BAC's clear, concise and honest concession that he was totally wrong.