Matthew Best
Penultimate Amazing
I think I see your problem. You need to remove your brain before you can begin to believe this.
well, I did see it posited by the administrator of PMF, so that (the brain removal) is always a possibility.
I think I see your problem. You need to remove your brain before you can begin to believe this.
I am genuinely glad the DNA will likely be thrown out and Amanda and Raffaele almost certainly released. I was on the fence a long time and leaning toward guilt but the TOD issue was very convincing to me, especially once Rolfe weighed in as well. The other issues were almost irrelevant due to the multitude of explanations to their existence, despite their intriguing natures. The DNA was however the only other strong indicator and I really hope now the truth will set them free. I mean that.
I think Rudy should be strung up by the proverbials for not using his time in court to come clean and exonerate them. I hope he gets time added to his sentence for perjury.
Could you post a link? Thanks. I thought it was a leak as the official report is not to be presented to the court until tomorrow.
Yes, because there's probably some super-sekret evidence in there that the experts deliberately left out of their "Conclusions" that completely changes things.
I'm sure you think Judge Hellmann is just going to jump to the end and not even bother reading the entire report. Guess why he's given both sides almost a month to analyze the report.
I'm sure you think Judge Hellmann is just going to jump to the end and not even bother reading the entire report. Guess why he's given both sides almost a month to analyze the report.
I suspect that the "request for freedom" for Knox/Sollecito that Sfarzo is referring to is not what you might think. I suspect he's talking about a request to release them from remand while the appeal trial is ongoing - to a position of either house arrest or total liberty. I don't think he's referring to a request to acquit.
PMF: Even if they were to throw out every shred of DNA evidence, however, Miss Knox's murder conviction will still be re-affirmed. You don't need DNA evidence to convict someone of murder. Miss Knox is so guilty it hurts to even hear her speak.
I agree. I can't wait to read the part of the report where it talks about Stefanoni falsely attributing the DNA results to Sollecito because she doesn't know how to read the test data. And then, just to prove that she has no idea what the hell she is talking about, she hid the test data for a few years, claiming that since she couldn't understand it, therefore no one else really needed to see it either.
Yes, it will be intresting to see how they came to their conclusions. How were their procedures different than Stefanoni's? Did they conduct different (possibly newer) tests? The court is going to have to understand how they came to their conclusions in order to accept or reject them.
Could this be the beginning of the end of the thread? There've been false dawns before, but this looks promising. Some decisive outcome has to be good, and decisively not guilty has to be the best outcome.
It reminds me of the Wizard of Oz. Dorothy has the ruby slippers and could go home any time, it just takes the good witch a long damn time to get around to telling her. The wheels of justice turn inhumanly slowly.
If this new document turns out to be open to other interpretations than the one that has been quoted, I shall be more than somewhat disappointed.
PMF: Even if they were to throw out every shred of DNA evidence, however, Miss Knox's murder conviction will still be re-affirmed. You don't need DNA evidence to convict someone of murder. Miss Knox is so guilty it hurts to even hear her speak.
Indeed. That looks significant. I take it no nuance is lost going from Italian to English? Doubtless if there is PMF will be on to it.Ha. Well, the other side is having to engage in some rather acrobatic contortions in order to rationalize this away. Quennell, for instance, tries to suggest that "not following international protocols" was the result of the local authorities following their own superior protocols.
I must say, however, it's really hard to get around the phrase "erroneous interpretation".
Let's wait and see. All we can tell for sure is how far things have melted so far, and they certainly seem to have melted quite a bit. Momentum is clearly important here, but this case has a history of throwing up surprises and defying predictions of exhonoration.Speaking of the Wizard of Oz, the quote posted by Rhea is suggestive of another scene:
"I'm melting, I'm melting!!"
WOW!
Originally Posted by Frank Sfarzo
At next hearing Stefanoni will defend the results obtained. This time she will be allowed to pose directly questions to Conti & Vecchiotti, but it will be just a desperate attempt to defend what exist on that knife and bra clasp: NOTHING.
In the same hearing the defense is expected to file a request of freedom for Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, which should definitely be granted.
This time we can say: CASO CHIUSO.