• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Clear evidence that 9/11 was an inside job

It's par for teh course for this poster, he seems to parrot stuff without actually thinking about it too hard.
 
Oystein said:
In any case, FatFreddy's approach was wrong from the get go because of lens distortion, and he executed it in wildly erroneous ways, while displaying on the go that he understands next to nothing about geometry, arithmetic and photo imaging. And no math involved.
Click to expand...

Yes, but he's sufficiently arrogant about it, so it's all good.
 
Oystein said:
I understand that lens distortion is significant, and that the image plane (or its normal, the direction that the camera is pointed towards), plays a role there.

In any case, FatFreddy's approach was wrong from the get go because of lens distortion, and he executed it in wildly erroneous ways, while displaying on the go that he understands next to nothing about geometry, arithmetic and photo imaging. And no math involved.
Click to expand...
I applaud you in realizing the futility of this exercise. There is also a clear understanding of your frustration with FastFreddy. Comparing measurements from a .jpg or some other captured image is not an amateurish adventure. I have witnessed hours upon hours of analyzing only to see the Geomatics Engineer ask for an updated keyhole image because they were 7 inches off...
 
You guys need to listen to Fatfreddy88. Stop obfuscating his spam with correctly worked out mathematics and diagrams;) We all know he is talking debating ignoring all responses, whilst copying and pasting someone else's work (without checking it!), and it is complete bunkum.

Now stop it, maybe we should all agree with him and he will go back to CT central and report a successful mission.:eye-poppi
 
While I'm sure fatfreddy88 copies and pastes others' work without checking it, he also links to his own posts on other forums and under different names, as if those are some kind of proof of something.

For those who don't know, some of his other names are Rocky, DavidC, Scott and Cosmored. Any time he posts linkbarf it's mostly to his own threads elsewhere. I've followed them around and once managed to describe a complete circle from link to link.
 
ApolloGnomon said:
While I'm sure fatfreddy88 copies and pastes others' work without checking it, he also links to his own posts on other forums and under different names, as if those are some kind of proof of something.

For those who don't know, some of his other names are Rocky, DavidC, Scott and Cosmored. Any time he posts linkbarf it's mostly to his own threads elsewhere. I've followed them around and once managed to describe a complete circle from link to link.
Click to expand...

Linkbarf LOL that is really funny, I wish I would have coined that.
 
Is it just me or does the aircraft look more clearly identifiable in the corrected picture?
 
frenat said:
Yeah, it couldn't possibly be that you weren't very clear with your constant spamming of links. :rolleyes:

If you would take the time to actually LOOK (which I doubt you will) you would see that BOTH 24% and 32% are correct, just like he said. 47 is 24% smaller than 62 and at the same time 62 is 32% bigger than 47. As he said, it depends on what you set as 100. Is it 47 or 62? Math isn't your strong suit is it?
Click to expand...

I don't think he's wearing anything at all.
 
Sam makes $6 an hour. Nelly makes $9 an hour.

Sam says Nelly makes half again more than him so the difference is 50%.

Nelly says Sam makes 2/3 what she makes, so the difference is 33%.

They're both right.
 
Uh oh, did we scare Freddy away with all of the reality talk?
 
No, he's a serial seagull. He'll be back with a completely unrelated post including links to his own posts elsewhere.

Sometimes he disappears from a thread for weeks at a time. He never really reads responses.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
The windows are still intact. A wing would have at least broken the windows.
Click to expand...

Guys, you're arguing Mathematics with someone who seems to think that the Pentagon has normal windows installed. Clearly Freddy hasn't sat down and studied the Pentagon in depth in terms of it's layout, construction and features. I strongly suggest he does so before posting again.
 
Oz1976 said:
It's not just you, as soon as I saw that image I thought the same thing.
Click to expand...

Careful though. In the original, the visible parts of the plane occupy only a few pixels, and there is not much contrast in them. Distorting (or undistorting) the photo manipulates the pixels and at best preserves what little real information there is, but more usually diminishes the signal.

You see a plane because you strongly expect to see a plane and have been lead where exactly to see it. Show the photo (minus the Pentagon, to remove context) to an uninitiated person, and ask them what objects they see, and it is pretty unlikely that they will see a plane.

Until one or two days ago, I wasn't even aware that the far half of the Pentagon wall is obstructed by the helipad tower / fire station. There is a whole building in the photo that I just didn't see until I saw BCR's copy of the 3D rendering!
 
Oystein said:
Careful though. In the original, the visible parts of the plane occupy only a few pixels, and there is not much contrast in them. Distorting (or undistorting) the photo manipulates the pixels and at best preserves what little real information there is, but more usually diminishes the signal.
Click to expand...


Still, I would be interested to see what the image of the plane from the other camera would look like through the same process, perhaps with the frame just before the plane appears in the field for comparison.
 
leftysergeant said:
Still, I would be interested to see what the image of the plane from the other camera would look like through the same process, perhaps with the frame just before the plane appears in the field for comparison.
Click to expand...

I'm at work and don't have access to the good version. Keep in mind I'm using the original FBI rather than the DoD web version. Better, but still low res. I'll try later this evening.

By the way, poor Freddy is getting frustrated because his link to this thread keeps changing to 'governmenytloyalist.org' over at P4T. Freddy doesn't realize that P4T is not about 'truth' yet. Even so, he is not finding any takers there for his 'clear evidence' either.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=12341&view=getnewpost
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom