I was just surmising based on your earlier stated view that Mr Moore is clever and harms the cause of the dead duck called revisionism.
Of course Dr Terry has you on ignore so doesn't see your many gems. Which I am sure you are aware of.
Indeed.
Bunny's drivel on Dziennik Polski ignores the fact that the facsimile in Walendy's screed is very clearly manipulated and the underlying original text is obscured deliberately by his hero. The Dziennik Polski article reports on a very well known press conference of the Polish government in exile which was widely reported elsewhere, with literally no other paper mentioning extermination at Treblinka. Nor do any of the historians who have examined the impact of the Bund report, which was the source that provided the information used in the press conference.
The coup de grace is surely the non-appearence of Walendy's gambit in Mattogno and Graf's book. They cite Walendy's work but don't cite this particular attempt to insinuate fraud and hoaxing.
Walendy's forgery, however, helps us understand that bunny's other references don't equate to a pre-22 July 1942 claim of mass extermination at Treblinka. Treblinka II began to be constructed from April 1942 and was built evidently using Jewish labour. (Not one single Jewish labourer who helped build Treblinka II, or indeed Belzec or Sobibor, survived the war.) The fact that underground reports began to distinguish the older Treblinka labour camp from a new and more lethal Treblinka camp in May-June 1942 indicates only that the new camp was more lethal, which was evidently true, as the Jewish labour force was evidently being decimated long before the camp opened for 'business' proper. The pre-opening reports are clearly exaggerated, but that is nothing unusual. They don't yet indicate a knowledge of Treblinka as a site of mass extermination, which emerged only later in the summer, after 22 July. None of these sources speak of five figure killings like Walendy's forgery. Ergo, no convergence and no carrot.
In the end, bunny ignores the fact that Walendy's facsimile is unusable as a source because it is so clearly a forgery that the burden of proof shifts squarely back onto whoever wants to use such a dubious source. This is surely why neither of the leading denier gurus thought it worth their while including it in their supposedly definitive screed.
Thus, nothing the bunny can say on this or any other forum about the article is worth listening to unless he produces a pristine and unmanipulated copy of the relevant issue of Dziennik Polski. It is his claim, his burden of proof, not mine or anyone else's.
And that's really as good a point as any to confirm that bunny is on deep ignore, so I cannot even see his posts. If bunny manages to source a proper copy of Dziennik Polski showing Walendy was not a liar, then I will take him off ignore. But not before.
I have you on ignore at Rodoh but not here, which I can't explain. It must have something to do with growing tired of waiting for the "outing" of OSR 24. And not having you on ignore here I forgot that I was avoiding discussion of your Treblinka rumors silliness and went ahead and did so. And Bomba the barber. And any number of other points. I wish I could go back and delete my reply on Treblinka/Warsaw, you know, to tart up the record denier style, so it conforms to your wishful thinking, but JREF seems to cut off the editing feature after some time lapse or something.
Tell Clayton to get working as his decoy act isn't working. Oh, and since Dr Terry has him on ignore as well, and that has been discussed in here, his distraction value for Dr Terry is as strong as your case on OSR 24.
This is probably as good a place as any to state that deniers who embrace multiple conspiracy theories (eg they're also Truthers, Birthers, anti-vaxxers, Moon Hoaxers, etc) and/or who are manifestly clinically insane and/or moronic are liable to be placed on deep ignore. There is simply no point bothering with posterboys for crank magnetism.
The second variable is whether the denier shows any kind of awareness, however dim, for either their own side's literature or the historical sources. Thus, although Saggy is evidently also a Birther, he doesn't seem to be a Truther, anti-vaxxer and Moon Hoaxer as well, and he does make vague gestures towards sources, however inept. Therefore he's not on ignore, whereas certain other deniers are.
The final variable is whether the denier tries to string an argument together. Currently only Dogzilla is trying to do that, so even though I don't think much of his argument and don't regard it as a coherent or substantiated polemic, he earns a modicum of respect for giving it a go. As the bunny knows full well, he started to be placed on ignore from me several years ago, when it became apparent that the vaunted rabbit was incapable of writing more than a few sentences on one point before hopping off to make another random dropping on another point. The suspicion then was that this behaviour pattern was irrevocable, and subsequent antics have more than borne this out.
all together now:
'It was dated September... it was not dated at all.'
