May Stundie Nominations

A post by Nick from http://www.restoretherepublic.org/s...we-can-remain-free-of-crisis-engineers/#p1895

I'm not posting this because I'm a conspiracy theorist, but rather because there are, and have been far too many things gone unexplained, and too many things that have been shown to be absolute frauds. Can you say Gulf of Tonkin?
Click to expand...

Followed by:

by Nicholas West and Zen Gardner
Activist Post and Before It’s News
The Powers-That-Be seem to be ramping-up efforts to drive a stake right into America’s heart(land). Natural disasters are on the rise, and an increasing amount of evidence is leading to the conclusion that these natural disasters might not be completely natural.
Some already have speculated that we are entering a time of weather and earthquake wars, as the incidence of mega disasters has risen across the world. Is government experimentation simply going awry, or is it being orchestrated on purpose? Are they hiding behind or even amplifying current natural earth changes such as the strong solar cycle and the on-going magnetic pole shift to accomplish some furtive plot?
The hidden hand has always cloaked itself using a wide array of techniques to conceal its divide-and-conquer agenda. By owning the ultimate weapon — the very climate upon which we all depend — entire regions can now be put under a full spectrum of remote control already served up through climate change, economic instability, and the military-surveillance complexbrought in under the false threat of terrorism.
Full article:
http://www.naturalmedicine.com…..engineers/
Click to expand...
 
Dave Rogers said:
Thanks to Meikel for bringing to our attention the latest flimsy excuse from Niels Harrit, explaining why he did his calorimetry tests in air, rather than in an inert atmosphere so that he could actually confirm or deny the existence of a thermite reaction. Sadly, I feel that no comment I can add can appropriately convey just how stupid a statement this is from someone who claims to have even a rudimentary understanding of chemical analysis, or indeed any area of scientific study whatsoever.



http://mysteries-magazin.com/index.php?op=news&func=news&id=5252

Actually, that's quite a relief. Since the WTC weighed more than a few microgrammes and wasn't demolished by a differential scanning calorimeter, we can ignore all of Harrit's results.

Dave
Click to expand...
Oh good, I haven't used this one in a while.

Ahem...

Somewhere in the universe, a black hole was created due to the sheer density of that stupid.
 
tempesta29 said:
The idea that only the north face of WTC 7 reached free fall is ludicrous. Does the face sheer off the rest of the building? Why would the least damaged side fall the fastest? Even if it were only the north face, how did those associated columns lose 100% of their strength?

Official story dupes basically dance around this topic, as they should (must).
Click to expand...

Breathtaking in its ignorance and arrogance, a true beauty.
 
a bit long, but...

The context:

Jack by the hedge said:
FatFreddy88 said:
Please link to where the info has been debunked and we can talk about whether it's really been debunked.

Let's hear someone address the evidence in post #1 that the craft in the picture was too small to be a 757.
Click to expand...
Well it's funny you should ask that, because:
FatFreddy88 said:
Look at the third picture from the top in this link.
http://www.flugplatzsiedlung.de/Pent_gate.pdf
Click to expand...

I scrolled down too far in your link and found the conclusion instead: "The hidden sector is 40 metres wide at 250m distance... This is more than enough to cover the projected length ... of an incoming B757-200."

So you debunked your own claim with your own link. Nice job.
Click to expand...


The stundie:
FatFreddy88 said:
So you debunked your own claim with your own link. Nice job.
Click to expand...
That link came from here.
http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php/48507-911-pentagon?p=891577#post891577
(post #1096)

The person who did that proof was trying to obfuscate the issue. He didn't even believe his own argument. The fact that he says it doesn't make it true.
Click to expand...
Good stuff being posted by FatFreddy88 from an internet cafe in Madrid, where he's having a busy work week. Not a fantasist, I'm sure.
 
This one really tickled my fansy despite it not being in the CT forum...

NewtonTrino said:
It wasn't an ad hominem. It was simply pointing out that you have a vested interest in the current legal system and that you're likely biased.
Click to expand...

So it wasn't an ad hominem, I was just attacking your argument and get people not to listen to you based on what you do is all.
 
Wow. May's gonna be a tough one to decide on. That recent FatFreddy88 one is amazing, perfect example of truthers reading one-line and reaching a conclusion.
 
Woowoo with serious paranoid delusion...

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5235542&postcount=2210

"Now the stuff I posted will get buried and they thread that used to have my posts will have the appearance that the pro-Apollo people are right. They know the hoax evidence is so clear that the only way they can sway public opinion is by keeping people from seeing the evidence.

The James Randi forum is one of those government damage-control sites on which the moderators use their power to control the direction debates take to give the impression that conspiracy theories such as "Apollo was faked", or "9/11 was an inside job" don't stand up to scrutiny.

"Clavius", "Bad Astronomy", and "Unexplained Mysteries" are others."

Woowoo to defend woowoo by calling anybody who disagrees with woowoo a shill.:eek:
 
Erock said:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5235542&postcount=2210

"Now the stuff I posted will get buried and they thread that used to have my posts will have the appearance that the pro-Apollo people are right. They know the hoax evidence is so clear that the only way they can sway public opinion is by keeping people from seeing the evidence.

The James Randi forum is one of those government damage-control sites on which the moderators use their power to control the direction debates take to give the impression that conspiracy theories such as "Apollo was faked", or "9/11 was an inside job" don't stand up to scrutiny.

"Clavius", "Bad Astronomy", and "Unexplained Mysteries" are others."

Woowoo to defend woowoo by calling anybody who disagrees with woowoo a shill.:eek:
Click to expand...

fatfreddy88 deserves an additional nomination for repeatedly insisting that apollohoax.net is the "clavius forum."
 
Erock said:
Woowoo to defend woowoo by calling anybody who disagrees with woowoo a shill.:eek:
Click to expand...

This sort of thing is common place among conspiracy theorists. Anyone who disagrees with them is either "sheeple" or a shill. You get called a shill for strenuously disagreeing with conspiracy theorists. I have been called a shill hundreds of times by conspiracy theorists.
 
LordXenu said:
This sort of thing is common place among conspiracy theorists. Anyone who disagrees with them is either "sheeple" or a shill. You get called a shill for strenuously disagreeing with conspiracy theorists. I have been called a shill hundreds of times by conspiracy theorists.
Click to expand...

I can beat that...a member of DIF thinks I'm a witch. :)
 
That's because you post in their bizarre version of a 911 subforum, where the "occult connections of 9/11" are a big deal. At least to one of the users it is. He's totally borked.
 
LordXenu said:
This sort of thing is common place among conspiracy theorists. Anyone who disagrees with them is either "sheeple" or a shill. You get called a shill for strenuously disagreeing with conspiracy theorists. I have been called a shill hundreds of times by conspiracy theorists.
Click to expand...

Talk to Gravy, he's the Patron Saint of Shill's
 
Comedy gold

http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1059906542&postcount=64

"Apparently Carl Sagan and a few others are aboard a secret spacecraft (in the mold of Voyager) on a one way ticket to interstellar space...

His death was faked in 1996. "

facepalm.gif
 
Erock said:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5235542&postcount=2210

"Now the stuff I posted will get buried and they thread that used to have my posts will have the appearance that the pro-Apollo people are right. They know the hoax evidence is so clear that the only way they can sway public opinion is by keeping people from seeing the evidence.

The James Randi forum is one of those government damage-control sites on which the moderators use their power to control the direction debates take to give the impression that conspiracy theories such as "Apollo was faked", or "9/11 was an inside job" don't stand up to scrutiny.

"Clavius", "Bad Astronomy", and "Unexplained Mysteries" are others."

Woowoo to defend woowoo by calling anybody who disagrees with woowoo a shill.:eek:
Click to expand...

I am a Mod on 'Bad Astronomy' When did I become a Shill? Why don't I get paid for this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom