Merged Discussion of the moon landing "hoax"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is NASA lying to us about space radiation?
Click to expand...
No. The Apollo missions did succeed in transporting humans to the moon and returning them safely to Earth. While a tiny number of woosters do not want to accept this reality, as it conflicts with ego driven need to believe the missions were faked, and thus give meaning to their pathetic lives, they are an irrelevant and utterly wrong minority.
 
Why does Sir Patrick need access to the Hubble?
Why would access to Hubble be vital for Sir Patrick?
 
Its a flipping creationist video.
Click to expand...
You're grossly misrepresenting what the scientist says in the video as anyone who actually watches it will see.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bAE7FGdNmA
(00:16 time mark)

If it means anything, I'm an agnostic and I think the earth is billions of years old. I just like to watch interesting stuff such as this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UhPMzsrZbw

Who knows. It may turn out that the official version is at least partially wrong.

I've got to cut it off now as it's about midnight where I am and I've got to get up early tomorrow. I'll be back.
 
Last edited:
Notice that conspiracy believers can never ever bring themselves to consider what the vast majority of people can see as plain as day. That where the "liars" are, are the ones pumping the conspiracy crap into their heads in the first place.
 
If NASA made up info about 'Space Radiation' Don't you think it would be discovered as a lie as soon as anyone else got into space? China? Japan? India? Russia? ESA?
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
Geez... this wide-ranging posting frenzy is the sort of thing a kid does when he's discovered old, old "information".

FatFreddy88: Have you just recently discovered these conspiracy theories?
Click to expand...

We sat through all this on Apollohoax a while ago.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
SPAM... This is probably why they had to fake the Apollo moon landings.
Click to expand...
What is the radiation we would get going to the moon? How many rem? Do have some numbers?

When will you use science instead of morons posting lies on the Internet as your source?
 
Last edited:
kookbreaker said:
What does he say? I can't run the video, only see the description. But you are trying to present a creationist video as evidence. That's not a good start.
Click to expand...
It's a she. Basically saying that you have to be with a university to get published in a scientific journal & if your theory is controversial, you can't be with a university, thus controversial theories are locked out.
 
The ISS is at an orbit of between 278 and 460 km.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iss

The inner Van Allen Belt begins at 100 km, and has radiation exceeding 100 MeV.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt#Inner_belt

Has the world been informed that everyone on the ISS is dead, and anyone who ever went there, is dead?




The Russian Mir space station, was at an orbit of between 296 km and 421 km

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mir

Has Russia been informed that all of the Cosmonauts died?
 
Last edited:
Redtail said:
It's a she. Basically saying that you have to be with a university to get published in a scientific journal & if your theory is controversial, you can't be with a university, thus controversial theories are locked out.
Click to expand...

I guess s/he never heard of tenure. Should we even bother with listing all the new controversial theories that have come from University professors.

All a bunch of nonsense to cover up a lack of convincing evidence.
 
Thunder said:
...

Has the world been informed that everyone on the ISS is dead, and anyone who ever went there, is dead?

...

Has Russia been informed that all of the Cosmonauts died?
Click to expand...

Ahem...

KingMerv00 said:
Will someone please inform the men and women aboard the ISS that they are, in fact, dead?
Click to expand...

See you in court for copyright infringement. Or would you rather just cut me a settlement check now? :D
 
ApolloGnomon said:
Well, I'll file your circumcised evidence under "unsupported nonsense" and move on then, shall I?

Now, how do your "anomalies in the footage" explain 840lbs of rock and soil samples returned from the moon, including multi-meter-long core samples?
Click to expand...

And the mirrors left on the Moon that any university or scientific body equipped with a powerful enough laser can bounce beams off. Or are they all in on it too? Fat Freddy's cat was the smarter of the pair,come to think of it.
 
Last edited:
Redtail said:
It's a she. Basically saying that you have to be with a university to get published in a scientific journal & if your theory is controversial, you can't be with a university, thus controversial theories are locked out.
Click to expand...

Ah yes, the 'Expelled' gambit with the word 'controversial' being used to as a euphemism for 'brain-dead wrong beyond comprehension'.

FatFreddy88 has failed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom