Red Ibis, what evidence would satisfy you?
Sadam Hussein's death video was pretty convincing
, as were the photos of his two sons.
It could have been faked.
You think video of the Pentagon crash was fake, so how can you tell which video is fake, and which is genuine?
That too can be faked. You've shown time and again that you don't believe in the photos of debris at the Pentagon and Shanskville.
You seem to haphazardly believe in footage you want to believe is true, and disregard any that doesn't fit with your preconceptions. You don't seem to have any discriminating system besides your own personal taste.
How is this a derail?1) Please don't derail into other topics.
2) Please don't misrepresent my position while derailing the discussion.
You are confusing the lack of evidence with denial of evidence.
I've seen plenty of footage of Arab Muslims marching dead guys down the street.
Palin weighs in:
Journalistic integrity seems inexistent outside the West. Don't they fact-check anything before they publish? No wonder conspiracy theories are so rampant in Asia, they have no method to filter the information.
That photo has been on the internet for at least 2 years. It was a known fake all along. Why anyone, especially some media outlets, ever used it, is beyond me.
This is the photo used to create the fake death photo. It was flipped and merged with another photo, and done very badly.
[qimg]http://thewashingtonroast.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Osama-Bin-Laden.jpg[/qimg]
What a monumental idiot.
When is this type of footage ever considered to be a warning that strikes fears in the hearts of the enemy? We all saw the towers fall. What was the widespread attitude? That we need to minimize our involvement in the Middle East? No. For many, it was a call to arms. What on earth would lead anyone to believe that a picture of a dead Bin Laden is going to cause any Al Qaida terrorist to pack his bags and go home?
After Tucson, I'd have expected Palin to have got a new PR agent. Must have killed her to wait three days without criticising Obama.
Best part:
Going ' viral ' is not the same as a virus..![]()
The fake photo and related videos are being used as bait by scammers seeking to download malware onto computers all over the world. Among other scams circulating, users are advised not to click on Facebook headlines such as “See video of bin Laden dead.”
Best part:
"I have seen a great number of poorly Photoshopped images in my time as a photographer and I can tell by the pixels that it is a fake," said Kenna Lindsay, a New York-based photographer who works with composite images.
![]()
This didn't get much traction the first time, one more try then I will drop it.
For the record, I do think he is dead. I am not a CT'ist in any way, shape, or form.
1) The extraordinary claim is that OBL was killed. Extraordinary because we were not able to do so for 10 years, and many started to wonder if we would ever even find him, let alone capture/kill him.
2) We have seen no evidence indicating he is dead outside of testimonials.
If we as a skeptic community are to stand proudly on our conclusions and arguments based on evidence, then we must apply it here as well. So I ask again, what evidence do we have that OBL was killed?
Do not try to hand-wave this away. Provide evidence for the conclusion that OBL is dead.
Again, I think we killed the sucka. I am just interested in the fact that before objections are even made, dissenting opinions have been hand waved away. That is not good skeptic thought or critical thinking skills. Rather than just say "CT is that way", or some similar remark, address the issue.
If you disagree with my characterization of the evidence, say so. If you disagree that this is an example of good critical thinking regarding evidence, then say so.
I agree that many CT'ists won't be swayed by evidence. What about a good skeptic? I would hope so.
(All above is meant friendly, but firm in my challenge of the thinking).
For the record, I do think he is dead. I am not a CT'ist in any way, shape, or form.