TFian
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Messages
- 1,226
Yeah? When? How many people? Evidence (apart from your wizard mentor)?
Who knows? http://dieoff.org/synopsis.htm
Yeah? When? How many people? Evidence (apart from your wizard mentor)?
Whenever you attack groupthinkers as being cult-like you will hear this rebuttal. You know exactly what sense I'm using the word "cult" in. Religions are just really big cults and this is a belief system that you have. You cannot refute that, because you cannot show us any evidence!If I'm part of a cult, who's my leader?
Well, the book has plenty of solid evidence *in it*...
No What? No that is not the modern view? No that is not reality? No you don't like it because it is against the cult?
Whenever you attack groupthinkers as being cult-like you will hear this rebuttal. You know exactly what sense I'm using the word "cult" in. Religions are just really big cults and this is a belief system that you have. You cannot refute that, because you cannot show us any evidence!
No it doesn't a book can only reference evidence! It would be referencing studies and facts about reality that exist online. Admit it you're just lazy. We asked you for evidence and you showed us a freakin' book that we have to buy to understand. Pile up the evidence here, we're desperate for the information in case you're correct about your doomsday scenarios.
Who knows? http://dieoff.org/synopsis.htm
That your solutions suck since they've been tried and failed.
So then, you're not using the word "cult" correctly. Kay
Who knows? http://dieoff.org/synopsis.htm
Thank you. You have no idea and rely on cartoon websites.
Wow. You managed to refute yourself with your own link. Quite the hat trick there.
Seriously, look at those graphs. They're old now. What has happened since the time they were made? Well, lots of things, but none of what those graphs predicted has come to pass. I particularly liked "2005 - THE END OF OIL EXPLORATION IN THE USA". Not so much, as it turns out.
That's your opinion, a conversation worth having.
You're simply abandoning reason to go along with your cult beliefs because that's giving a huge reward to your brain. Which can be the only logical appraisal of your system because there is absolutely zero evidence for it.
"The word cult pejoratively refers to a group whose beliefs or practices are considered abnormal or bizarre"
You simply aren't familiar with the common usage, probably because you don't spend a lot of time working with cults.
Blathering about how I'm wrong (I'm not) in the way I use a word doesn't dispute that you're an antihumanist and a group thinker.
That's a blog. Did you make another mistake with your copy and paste? Oh I get it, you're too lazy or cowardly to make your own case/rant here using references to actual data and empirical facts. Have fun courting an audience in the future.
You know, the brain state you get when you reach a conclusion, when you think you have reality dialed, we're biased towards conclusions that fit our beliefs. You're an antihumanist, so you support the idea that we're going to all die and poison the world and nothing can change that.What reward is that?
Do you not have access to a dictionary or wikipedia?Source?
The doomday antihumanists? People who fearmonger about oil and hate humanity because of the imaginary apocolypse we're about to bring on ourselves? In general the Gaia cult?What group am I part of?
Not in our conversation. You mentioned this to score imaginary pointsThat's funny, because when I ask for evidence, I just get crap like "longbet" that has no empirical evidence whatsoever...
How about some studies? How about some projections that use evidence? How about some historical context (as in more studies and charts not a worded history lesson)? You know, real science.Or in other words, what exactly are you looking for? Be more specific.
A link to a book doesn't constitute evidence. And from the description of the book, it seems to be nothing more than a pompous version of this:
[qimg]http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/turtles.png[/qimg]
You know, the brain state you get when you reach a conclusion, when you think you have reality dialed, we're biased towards conclusions that fit our beliefs. You're an antihumanist, so you support the idea that we're going to all die and poison the world and nothing can change that.
Do you not have access to a dictionary or wikipedia?
In general the Gaia cult?
You mentioned this to score imaginary points![]()
How about some studies? How about some projections that use evidence? How about some historical context (as in more studies and charts not a worded history lesson)? You know, real science.
You belong to a cult that uses nature worship and anti-humanism as a dopamine fueled escape from the difficult work of improving quality of life on earth, which I find disgusting and pathological.

wow....
what is this cult?
who is the leader?
Oil peaked in the continental USA long before 2005...
I'm talking about our reward circuitry shaped by evolution. When you get a thought that you think accurately describes reality you get a reward. Your personal psychology is bent towards antihumanism. See Robert Burton: On Being Certain for research.Huh? I get no reward for that though.
I got that quote from wikipedia, the first sentence. I have the oxford dictionary on CD-ROM, so just, have fun in your own little world where you get to invent definitions of words.Yes, and they don't conform to your definition.
You're not the first person to pull this semantics act. Just google "Gaia cult" There are many interpretations of what those two words mean together. Here's oneWhere is this "Gaia cult"? I want to check it out![]()
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/others/pdf/oil_peaking_netl.pdfOh well, you could have just asked...
wow....
what is this cult?
who is the leader?
Every cult-like group that doesn't have a specific leader has learned to make this argument. If you prefer I shall declare you pseudoscientific group thinkers with a pathological element.
Which has absolutely nothing to do with "the end of oil exploration". Do you accept that oil exploration in the continental USA has not ended, or not?
Your personal psychology is bent towards antihumanism. See Robert Burton: On Being Certain for research.
I got that quote from wikipedia, the first sentence. I have the oxford dictionary on CD-ROM, so just, have fun in your own little world where you get to invent definitions of words.
You're not the first person to pull this semantics act. Just google "Gaia cult" There are many interpretations of what those two words mean together. Here's one
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/others/pdf/oil_peaking_netl.pdf
Great, now all you have to do is make a specific claim about the future, and point to the figures and facts, what page figure numbers etc, that back up those specific claims. That report doesn't make a single claim it talks about a lot of different things.