mehmetin
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 370
If flight 93 was not delayed it still would have been a "succession", just a different order.
Your "theory" is junk. By the way, I worked down by the airport the other day, All the planes took off in "succession".
![]()
Flight 93 was delayed to fit such succession. It get out from the gate at 8:00, it was planned to take off at 8:01; getting into the piste, let's say it could take off at 8:10. It waited up to 8:42 before take off! Why? The official LIE is "heavy trafic". That is full lie, the number of flights which took off from Newark does not justify such claim. Here is the flights which took off from Newark on the morning of 9/11/2001.
That means, the officials delayed flight UA93 to avoit it go too much westward before the team be able to control it and make it return back toward white house. That's why it took off only 4 minutes before the frist impact; the last time to take off, after the first impact nothing will be normal, so it may not take off.
For everybody here, I do not anwser to insult and baseless opinions. (Your "theory" is junk.) is a baseless opinon.
