Scott Sommers
Illuminator
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2009
- Messages
- 3,866
Good point. The reason I think they didn't try was because Avery would announce every tiny little thing as proof of the coming greatness of Loose Change. Remember 3000 screens? Remember 12 countries? Remember Mark Cuban? These were all preliminary inquiries that never went anywhere, as so often happens in Hollywood, but Avery announced them to his fans as if they were closed deals. I would have expected the tiniest hint of a real Hollywood career to be sung to the rooftops.
True, but Avery's marketable skill wasn't technique. His skill was in presenting the material in an effective way. Lots of people tried making 9-11 conspiracy videos -- including veterans of the art like Alex Jones -- but only LC really caught on. It even buried From Freedom To Fascism, made by a real filmmaker, Aaron Russo. Don't ask me to quantify it, but something made his movie succeed where so many others failed.
And as much as we mock Loose Change's fan base as being 20-something males, that is a difficult-to-reach demographic. If nothing else, I'd think marketers and advertisers could find some lessons in LC.
I think that was just one factor, and one of questionable importance. Daniel Sunjata's involvement with LC doesn't seem to have hurt his career. A-List celebrities Rosie O'Donnell and Charlie Sheen acknowledged it without their reputations being hurt. And this was 4-6 years ago, at the height of the movie's hype arc, and also of Bush Derangement Syndrome.
Movie and TV deals fail to materialize for many reasons. We don't know why things like the View appearance and the Mark Cuban thing fell through for Dylan Avery. Personally, I think mainstream cinematic distribution of LC was never financially viable, since its appeal was way too narrow and the movie was already on the Internet for free. That's ignoring the rights problems, the toxic subject matter, the technical deficiencies and so on.
Getting back to the original proposition... I think there were a lot of reasons these guys failed to leverage Loose Change into legitimate careers. It probably wasn't as simple as I suggested. Still, they don't seem to have gained anything from the experience.
These are all excellent points. Although when I was thinking more generally of Hollywood stars who had supported this nonsense. There's a Facebook page about this. I don't know if you can view it, but this is it here.
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2103282&id=1099968930&fbid=1740454586741
There's also this video
http://www.myspace.com/video/vid/20111633#pm_cmp=vid_OEV_P_P
and this
But you hear nothing from virtually any of these guys anymore.
If we limit ourselves to major Hollywood promotors of 911 conspiracy-type-stuff, like Daniel Sunjata, Rosie O'Donnell and Charlie Sheen, they pretty much seem to be self-destructing, along the same lines as our Loose Change heroes. It may just be a process of natural selection. Only the stupid ones stuck around after 2008. You don't hear anything from David Lynch or James Brolin anymore - not even a peep.Uh, Rosie O Donnell's support of 9/11 Truth was a major reason she lost her gig on the View, and she has not really been heard of isnce.
Last edited:
