• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

South Tower 81st floor filled with thermite?

Captain_Swoop said:
If there was a 'different' flight where is the plane? where are the passengers that were on it?

Question still stands.
Click to expand...

Basically his answer is that the people on the planes didn't exist, and all the families who had their loved ones die on the planes, were paid off to lie that they lose a loved one.

Not only are kooks like this guy, so vile and dimwitted as to believe and regurgitate such outrageous lies, they think we are all even dumber than they are and won't catch it and see them as the pathetically gullible and obvious habitual liars that they are.

Meanwhile they have the nerve to call this crap "the truth" and constantly accuse everyone else, even the victims, of being liars...
 
Anders Lindman said:
Yes it does! Flight UAL175 was an ordinary plane with real passengers. The passengers on the real flight 175 are today thinking: "Lucky that our flight (UAL175) wasn't the one that got hijacked (UA175) and crashed into the World Trade Center."
Click to expand...

(1) No, it doesn't. You've invented a flight that didn't exist, which simply makes your fantasy even more absurd because you now have to explain why there's no record of this flight or of these people.
(2) But, of course, the important question is, why do you choose to believe everything you make up?

Dave
 
Zep said:
He doesn't believe any of it. He's just faeces-stirring.
Click to expand...

If he did believe it he would be in the rubber room wearing a straightjacket. Ignore is the best option unless you want a good laugh reading his drivel.
 
Dave Rogers said:
(1) No, it doesn't. You've invented a flight that didn't exist, which simply makes your fantasy even more absurd because you now have to explain why there's no record of this flight or of these people.
(2) But, of course, the important question is, why do you choose to believe everything you make up?

Dave
Click to expand...

I did not. The flight existed alright. And was still flying in the air about an hour after it is supposed to have crashed into the South Tower! See: http://i55.tinypic.com/nlbmgg.jpg
 
Anders Lindman said:
I did not. The flight existed alright. And was still flying in the air about an hour after it is supposed to have crashed into the South Tower! See: http://i55.tinypic.com/nlbmgg.jpg
Click to expand...

How do you know that image being shown on live tv was a LIVE image? If there would have been a picture of Francisco Franco in the background of a live broadcast would you be claiming he was still alive?
 
It's more likely that was a later broadcast being transmitted after the plane had already been crashed where the broadcasters were attempting to show the path of the plane using data they obtained from somewhere, either the FAA or some other entity that had access to that sort of data (it doesn't look like radar tracks to me though). Completely explainable, except in the diseased minds of truthers.
 
Can I suggest that, rather than speculating about a grainy TV image presented without comment, we ask Anders to explain where the image comes from, what it claims to show, and how this supports his claim that UAL175 was a separate flight to UA175 and was still flying an hour after UA175 was reported as having struck the South Tower? At the moment, it's no more than an illegible chunk of bare assertion fallacy, from which I can't discern any useful information whatsoever.

Anders, please explain where this picture comes from, what you believe it shows, and why you believe that.

Dave
 
911 WAS a INSIDE JOB

.


ON 911 THE DISINTEGRATION OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER WAS A INSIDE JOB, ORGANISED ORCHESTRATED AND EXECUTED BY THE george bush REGIME OFFICIALS


.
 
Anders Lindman said:
"In addition, I had just discovered Black Op Radio earlier in the year and found an interesting show in their archives (# 156) on which Ellen and Mr. Berg appeared as guests. This may be the single biggest point concerning 9-11, and hopefully the last nail in the coffin of our government's lies. During this broadcast, Mrs. Mariani said that she was the only relative of all the passengers that died on Flight 175 that crashed into the South Tower. Her lawyer, Phil Berg, repeated this statement." -- From: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=6498.0

She was the ONLY relative to all the alleged passengers of the flight 175 that they said crashed into the South Tower? :confused::rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I don't care which side of the fence you're really on.

The game that you're playing is revolting.

Grow up.
 
Anders Lindman said:
The passengers on the fictitious planes must naturally also be fictitious, either completely made up or people who have been bribed to lie etc.
Click to expand...

So, Ed Felt, a workwate of BigAl (a poster here) and all the other relatives have been bribed?

How much would it take for you to cover up the murder of a family member of yours? How about your mother's murder?

My fee would be somewhere around $100,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000 US dollars. What would yours be?
 
triforcharity said:
So, Ed Felt, a workwate of BigAl (a poster here) and all the other relatives have been bribed?

How much would it take for you to cover up the murder of a family member of yours? How about your mother's murder?

My fee would be somewhere around $100,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000 US dollars. What would yours be?
Click to expand...

What murder? I don't think there was any plane crashing into the WTC towers. It was a complete media hoax.
 
Considering even the FAA, who are SUPPOSED to know where flights are, believed Flight 11 was still in the air up to forty some-odd minutes AFTER it had plowed into the North Tower, I'm not all that inclined to believe the word of some purported reporter who may have been reporting erroneous information that he/she BELIEVED was true at the time. Anders, have you bothered to check and see if the reporter in question retracted their statement at a later time?
 
Anders Lindman said:
The news anchor says that what is shown are planes in the air, right now!

Check out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdXGSefI6pM
Click to expand...

So against ALL physical and eye witnesses evidence, it seems more likely to you that somehow the planes never existed rather than the anchor simply made a mistake or was misinformed? Seriously? Is that how your brain works?

You can't accept things like this in a vacuum. The preponderance of evidence has to be taken into consideration when coming to a conclusion as to whether there were planes or not. No investigator worth his salt would take this as evidence that there were no planes in the face of the evidence there was.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom