Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

I took a look at that website and they don't believe in the no planes theory it seems. That's ok with me, since what if the no planes theory after all is wrong. I believe the no planes scenario is the truth, but I'm not 100% sure, so it's good imo to have several competing theories.

I think both your theories and Mehmetin's are correct. There were no-planes and also planes remote controlled with nerve gas. That definitely makes the most sense, if you adjust your tinfoil hat just so.. it's a double-vision thing.
 
I think both your theories and Mehmetin's are correct. There were no-planes and also planes remote controlled with nerve gas. That definitely makes the most sense, if you adjust your tinfoil hat just so.. it's a double-vision thing.

I'm beginning to think those two are the missing twins everyone's been talking about. :D
 
You know, you admitted to everyone here that you don't know anything cause you've never researched it.

So you really don't know anything, which is why you're stretching the truth, which means you're just here to make up lies that have been debunked long ago.

The perpetrators have rendered the U.S. government powerless and are holding it hostage. At the same time the U.S. government is forced to snare itself into an ever more messy web of lies through upholding and continuing the cover-up. Not a pretty picture.
 
If the U.S. government admitted having done a huge cover-up it would be legally prosecuted out of the country. So they can't do that. They are trapped!
 
If the U.S. government admitted having done a huge cover-up it would be legally prosecuted out of the country. So they can't do that. They are trapped!

If there were actually a cover-up in the first place. Big IF. There is no proof - you don't have any, nor does anybody else.

If I won the lottery, I'd be rich. :D
 
The perpetrators have rendered the U.S. government powerless and are holding it hostage. At the same time the U.S. government is forced to snare itself into an ever more messy web of lies through upholding and continuing the cover-up. Not a pretty picture.

But you don't know who did it and why and you don't know who covered it up. You still don't know anything because you told us that you don't know.
 
But you don't know who did it and why and you don't know who covered it up. You still don't know anything because you told us that you don't know.

I don't know who the perpetrators were, but those have done, and still are doing, the cover-up, are ordinary innocent people in key positions in all areas of society.
 
Is it incompetent to get the entire U.S. government plus others to do the cover-up for them? And fool almost the entire world (at least for a fairly long time). It seems to me that their mission from the perpetrators point of view is successfully accomplished.

Please produce evidence of this cover up on the part of the US Government.
 
Produce evidence that no planes were involved in the attacks.

You can’t ask him for evidence, he already stated that he has none.

Originally Posted by Anders Lindman: Yeah, since I have no first-hand information, I have no real evidence. So that is to be expected.
 
Anders Lindman = Anal Nerd's Mind.

(anagram)
Therefore proving that Anders is a disinfo agent - he's trying to throw everyone from what really happened. :jaw-dropp Anders: How much are you paid per annum by the NWO?
 
Many Truthers blame George W. Bush for the 9/11 attacks and at the same they say that he made goofy slip-ups in his speeches as mistakes. I doubt that GWB is guilty of the initial attacks on September 11, 2001 and instead I believe that his slip-ups were deliberate, carefully chosen to bring messages to people in key and high positions who were forced to go along with the cover-up.

Here is one such message from George W. Bush at a Presidential News Conference, September 15, 2006:

"For example, Khalid Sheik Mohammed described the design of plane attacks on building inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people.

He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping." [My emphasis]

Source: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0609/15/cnr.02.html

Video clip with a part of that speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC6b6oQIyuw

A slip-up? No, a deliberate message to those above "a point high enough" who were, like himself, trapped and had to go along with the cover-up.
 
Last edited:
And our main point is yes. Oh yes it is.

Maybe only because you have seen what looked like planes hitting the WTC on CNN? :rolleyes: At least they looked more like real planes (until they glided into the towers) than what can (can't) be seen in the video released from the attack on the Pentagon. :rolleyes::D
 
Many Truthers blame George W. Bush for the 9/11 attacks and at the same they say that he made goofy slip-ups in his speeches as mistakes. I doubt that GWB is guilty of the initial attacks on September 11, 2001 and instead I believe that his slip-ups were deliberate, carefully chosen to bring messages to people in key and high positions who were forced to go along with the cover-up.

Here is one such message from George W. Bush at a Presidential News Conference, September 15, 2006:

"For example, Khalid Sheik Mohammed described the design of plane attacks on building inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people.

He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping." [My emphasis]

Source: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0609/15/cnr.02.html

Video clip with a part of that speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC6b6oQIyuw

A slip-up? No, a deliberate message to those above "a point high enough" who were, like himself, trapped and had to go along with the cover-up.

No.
 

Back
Top Bottom