Muslim researcher explains how 9/11 was made

mehmetin said:
A cruise missile system getting out of its target will act EXACTLY like that. Have a look to the behavior of PID regulation loops that are used for such systems.
Click to expand...

Even if that were true, it wasn't a 'cruise missile' that was acting like that. It was a commercial airliner being flown by crazy scumbags who didn’t care how there flying looked to those watching on tv/youtube.

To humour your assertion that these aircraft where installed with "tomahawk systems", please advise how that "installed system" can "act exactly like that" whilst installed in a larger, heavier, wider, longer body?

I assume that your 'aeronautical knowledge' and your 'engineering knowledge' wont handwave this!
 
Last edited:
mehmetin said:
Make a search, you'll find most of the forums. Some others made that search and found.

You can also have a look to my work.
Click to expand...

you have no physical evidence of explosives being used on 9-11.

sorry...but you fail.
 
mehmetin said:
Bombs are demolition of asbestos containing buildings = double crime made by the people who planted the bombs.

But hijacked planes = Muslims terrorist!

It not waste of good planes, it's a fraudulent operation to accuse innocents and start more wars to kill more people.
Click to expand...

Lol. Ahhhhhhh ..........it was the jew who couldnt afford the asbestos removal mantra tied in with more wacky woooooo. Wasn't that Christopher Bollyn?
 
mehmetin says...
What’s the probability for :

1- All 8 pilots of the flight were unable to key the “four digit hijack code” into their keyboard? Zero. The only explanation is “they were killed almost immediately without being aware about what was happening”. That implies the use of poison gas.
Click to expand...
What is the possibility of putting in the code when your throat is cut?
How can you put in the code if you are fighting someone killing you from behind?

Being killed immediately implies cut throat by a moron suicide religious fanatic, not some poison gas moron made up fantasy.
 
mehmetin said:
What’s the probability for :

1- All 8 pilots of the flight were unable to key the “four digit hijack code” into their keyboard? Zero. The only explanation is “they were killed almost immediately without being aware about what was happening”. That implies the use of poison gas.
Click to expand...
I think the probability of a pilot punching in the 4-digit hijacking code while he is strapped into his seat fighting for his life as some lowlife degenerate jihadist plunges a knife into his jugular vein approaches zero.
 
Last edited:
Good Lord.

Does this guy SERIOUSLY think the Tomahawk cruise missile can be made to fly that erratically?

Wow; that has to be one of the dumbest ideas I've seen on this forum, and let's face it, we've seen a lot.
 
mehmetin:

I put it to you that you began with the assumption that Muslims were not responsible for the 9/11 attacks and then worked your way backwards to attempt to spin the evidence in favor of your belief. I posit that your motivation for said actions were one or more of the following:

1. The very idea that fellow Muslims could be responsible for such a vicious, calculated crime is so unimaginably shameful to you that it is more that your psyche can bear, therefore you simply dismiss the idea outright.

2. Your fear that a group of Muslims being branded as being responsible for the most infamous act of terrorism in history will put the religion of Islam and its adherents in a bad light and that said adherents will become the victims of abuse and scorn by the rest of the world. Modern history has shown that such fears aren't entirely unfounded, but that is no excuse for denying a harsh, unpleasant truth.

3. Your hatred and mistrust for the ethnoreligious group known as the Jewish people which you already felt well before 9/11/2001.

4. Your hatred and mistrust for the US Government, partly because their support for Israel.

Debunk that:cool:
 
JohnG said:
mehmetin:

I put it to you that you began with the assumption that Muslims were not responsible for the 9/11 attacks and then worked your way backwards to attempt to spin the evidence in favor of your belief. I posit that your motivation for said actions were one or more of the following:

1. The very idea that fellow Muslims could be responsible for such a vicious, calculated crime is so unimaginably shameful to you that it is more that your psyche can bear, therefore you simply dismiss the idea outright.

2. Your fear that a group of Muslims being branded as being responsible for the most infamous act of terrorism in history will put the religion of Islam and its adherents in a bad light and that said adherents will become the victims of abuse and scorn by the rest of the world. Modern history has shown that such fears aren't entirely unfounded, but that is no excuse for denying a harsh, unpleasant truth.

3. Your hatred and mistrust for the ethnoreligious group known as the Jewish people which you already felt well before 9/11/2001.

4. Your hatred and mistrust for the US Government, partly because their support for Israel.

Debunk that:cool:
Click to expand...

He has a point, mehmetin. One could make a case that you are not objective enough to perform a proper investigation of the event.
 
mehmetin,

on page 1 of this thread, I made 5 posts that addressed your opening post and your presentation in great detail, asking you specific questions and giving you specific evidence that proves every claim you made on the referred pages is FALSE. I am talking about posts numbers...
19
22
24
25
29

I then made 1 post (#32) that I started with "I am running out of time now", so there I did not provide the facts and the links to prove you wrong.

Predictably, you only replied to #32, and ignored all the questions and evidence in 19, 22, 24, 25 and 29.

Please be so kind and reply to these also. And please do so sincerely.
Thanks.
 
mehmetin said:
Even cockpit struggle does explain that for 8 pilots. In all cases, one pilot is able to key that code.
Click to expand...

The pilots who weren't killed before they could react obviously would have been trying to defend themselves. If you were a pilot and being attacked would your priority be 1) save your life OR 2) punch the hijack code on the transponder?

They might not have even remembered the code it had been many years since the last US plane was hijacked and stress adversely affects memory

You did not mention the coincidence of Pete Zalewski successive orders with the takeover of the first plane AA11! Does that mean you agree with the analysis?
Click to expand...

Why is this suspicious? Obviously the hijacking would have started after one radio communication and before another. I don't think understands what your point it.
 
Last edited:
Lenbrazil said:
...Obviously the hijacking would have started after one radio communication and after another. I don't think understands what your point it.
Click to expand...

You mean after one radio communication and before another.
This is logically so obvious that it is hard to grasp why mehmetin doesn't get it.
 
mehmetin said:
Some Muslims feel themselves attacked by USA and Israel.

I consider only the first testimony of UBL on the day of 9/1/2001 (he denied his implication), all other testimonies were made under pressure of killing him by the biggest army in the worlds! All are irrelevant.

(SNIP Crap)
Click to expand...

You can say 'extremists and fanatics'. Those who interpret 'the book' with hatred to the west and all who aren't Muslim.

UBL and his bodyguard met all the hyjackers in person. No need to threaten him. UBL's family, his brother and children agree that their father/brother is the man behind 911. They have seen his videos and acknowledge that it is him.

Debunk them!
 
Lenbrazil said:
...
They might not have even remembered the code it had been many years since the last US plane was hijacked and stress adversely affects memory
...
Click to expand...
This is not true, airline pilots do not forget hijacking codes and procedures.
 
mehmetin said:
I consider only the first testimony of UBL on the day of 9/1/2001 (he denied his implication), all other testimonies were made under pressure of killing him by the biggest army in the worlds! All are irrelevant. I think, later he also believed some Muslims made the strikes and tried to support them. But that only shows he was fighting USA for its presence in Saudi Arabia; that we knew it before 911.
Click to expand...

Please point to any denials he made that were from him as quoted by the Taliban who obviously had a vested interest in diverting blame from their country. Why would threats from the US make confess? His ambition is to be a martyr.

The DNA analysis of the Pentagon passengers identified NO hijacker, only passengers were identified.
Click to expand...

That's because none of their relatives submitted samples for comparison.
I don't have enough time for the rest of your ignorant BS
 
- The timeline of the hiijacks shows that the hijacks were successive, like one teame controlling one plane at a time. Such hijacks could not be made by 4 different teams inside each plane.
Click to expand...

Why not? All it needs is four teams....which they had.

- The plane that hit the Pentagon was not a B757. It was smaller with about 95ft wingspan, that is consistent with a B737-200/300/400.
Click to expand...

Nope plane was exactly the right size to have been a 757 and was identified as such by several witnesses. Its a easy plane to ID.

- The twin towrs were demolished by using radio controlled conventionnal explosives placed on key positions accessibles from the lifts' shafts. That can be made during the week end.
Click to expand...

Yet no evidence of explosives was seen not found in the rubble. So why do you think explosives was used????

All strong evidences are consistent with these conclusions. And that proves that Muslims are NOT involved.
Click to expand...

How? even if your ludicrous theory was right how do you know none of the evil Gov. conspirators was not a Muslim :) Do you have a list of the thousands of people that would have to be involved AND checked the religion of every last one. Can we have a copy of that list?:D
 
However minor you think the passenger list vs. victim list is you need to remove it from your site. It has been proven to you to be incorrect. I would ask that you please remove things that have been proven false one at a time. Of course your site will start to dwindle down to nothing until all it says is "I don't believe the government" and "all the evidence is faked" but you have a responsibility to tell the truth if you want any credibility on your "research". So, are you going to make that change and then we can move on to the next debunkable claim ?
 
Oystein said:
Predictably, you only replied to #32, and ignored all the questions and evidence in 19, 22, 24, 25 and 29.

Please be so kind and reply to these also. And please do so sincerely.
Thanks.
Click to expand...

Amazing work today. You sir, have far too much time on your hands:cool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom