And I gave you one. Follow the link. Scott bases his idea on Jeurgens' ideas, and Jeurgens' ideas are garbage. As my link shows.
That's a circular argument bringing us back to your
supposed de-bunk using the wrong model for your math.
Nobody seems to. Because there's no way to put in numbers which will work. By avoiding numbers, Scott avoids being proven wrong.
Again, by using numbers in the wrong model you
prove Scott wrong. brilliant logic
But you can't actually demonstrate why. You can't show how adding dynamics can change any of the conclusions I reached.
Your just "adding epicycles" with each new puzzle the space probes uncover. It took over 1500 years before
Ptolemy's view of the Universe was shown to be false. Why so long? maybe, because the mathematicians wouldn't let go.
Just like now?
After decades of peddling this stuff, an "idea" is all they've got?
Yes, but what an
idea!
It makes sense of what we have
actually found.
No need for the invention of all the invisible, unknowable, dark stuff, just to balance the math ie NO "adding epicycles".
The Electric Universe
http://www.plasmacosmology.net/electric.html
And we're supposed to be impressed?
I'm sure nothing will shake
some out of their paradigm lock.
Like I said before, NOBODY on the EU side can come up with any possible mechanism other than core fusion by which to power the sun.
Yes they have (my hilite):
Fusion in the Double Layer
"The z-pinch effect of high intensity, parallel current filaments in an arc plasma is very strong. Whatever nuclear fusion is taking place on the Sun is occurring here in the double layer (DL) at the top of the photosphere (not deep within the core). The result of this fusion process are the "metals" that give rise to absorption lines in the Sun's spectrum. Traces of sixty eight of the ninety two natural elements are found in the Sun's atmosphere. Most of the radio frequency noise emitted by the Sun emanates from this region. Radio noise is a well known property of DLs. The electrical power available to be delivered to the plasma at any point is the product of the E-field (Volts per meter) times current density (Amps per square meter). This multiplication operation yields Watts per cubic meter. The current density is relatively constant over the height of the photospheric / chromospheric layers. However, the E-field is by far the strongest at the center of the DL.
Nuclear fusion takes a great deal of power - and that power is available in the DL."
http://www.electric-cosmos.org/sun.htm
Electromagnetism simply cannot sustain the necessary power output. Nothing other than fusion can, and core fusion is the only way to make sustainable fusion on that scale. End of story.
Galactic Birkeland currents contract in a "Z" pinch to form the Sun and this current powers the fusion taking place at the top of the photosphere.
Here an explanation from Scott in his rebuttal of Bridgman
"
POWERING THE SUN FROM THE OUTSIDE Starting on his page 17 Bridgman launches into a long discussion peppered with equations, tables of numbers, and diagrams, all designed to disprove the possibility of powering the Sun electrically from the outside. My reaction to it can be summarized as follows:
Whether or not Juergens was completely correct in his assertion that the Sun is totally or partially powered by external electrical excitation is really not the most important aspect of the Electric Star (ES) hypothesis. This question is one of the most controversial and speculative aspects of plasma cosmology. So it is an easy one to pick on.
What is important is that most of the phenomena we observe on and above the photospheric surface of the Sun (a partially ionized plasma) are explainable in terms of well-known properties of plasma. This is true no matter how the Sun gets its power.
Establishment astronomers appear certain about how the Sun generates its power and what is occurring deep down within it. They claim that the core of the Sun is a continuous nuclear fusion reactor. This core occupies 20% of the Sun’s radius. Surrounding the core is a radiative zone wherein heat energy is transported away from the core by photons. This zone occupies some 50% of the Sun‟s radius. Sitting on top of this structure (and occupying the remaining 30% of the radius) is another zone in which heat is carried to the surface by convection columns – very much like hot air rising from the top of a hot stove. The entire journey from the core to the surface takes between 100,000 and 200,000 years. The granulations we see on the surface of the photosphere are supposedly the tops of 150,000-mile-long “convection columns” – stable tubes of rising matter that transport heat energy up from the Sun’s core toward the surface. Presumably that matter sinks back down toward the bottom of the convection zone along the edges of the tubes.
But if this complete process actually takes many thousands of years, then why do the “granules” change shape and even disappear in a period of hours?
Next, above the photosphere, is the chromosphere, a relatively thin layer approximately 2000-3000 km in height. In comparison to the much brighter photosphere, it glows faintly in red. The standard model does not predict its existence or explain it very well.
A temperature minimum occurs just above the chromosphere. The lower regions of the Sun‟s corona, quite high above the visible surface, are millions of degrees hotter than the surface of the Sun itself. Although astrophysicists like TB scoff at the idea these observations might present serious problems for their model, others are not quite as confident. The region of the temperature minimum is called the transition zone.
Above the transition zone an extended glowing plasma structure that we can see during solar eclipses exists – the corona – it is a fully ionized plasma. Beyond the corona, an 8
invisible plasmasphere (heliosphere) extends out, many times the distance of the planet Pluto. The corona and the plasmasphere carry streams of ions and electrons that have been named the „solar wind.‟ The standard fusion model provides no fundamental reason for the existence of the chromosphere, the corona, the plasmasphere, or the solar wind. The adherents of this model do recognize these entities exist of course and have ad hoc explanations ready for them. But, if the standard (non-electrical) model were correct, heat and light ought to simply radiate away from the photosphere as from a hot stove.
The flux of ions that the Sun emits in the solar wind varies in intensity. The ion stream sometimes stops completely. How? Why? And the ions in the solar wind accelerate – their velocity increases the farther away from the Sun they get. How? Why? Again the standard model has only ad hoc explanations for these observations. The Sun rotates more rapidly at its equator than near its poles. Why? If it does operate as a Faraday (homopolar) motor as the ES model suggests, this phenomenon is completely expected."
http://members.cox.net/dascott3/RebutTB.pdf
Sorry. 
