Yep. As we have seen
here, Roosevelt confided to Churchill, that for him it was a matter of trial and error. Perhaps Roosevelt was lucky enough that the Germans would attack on the Atlantic or otherwise a war could start with Japan. After the Newfoundland meeting that was what Roosevelt decided to focus on:
Ah, so Yamamoto was a part of the Jewish conspiracy was he? Then clearly his death at the hands of the USAAC was just to complete the coverup. It all makes perfect sense now.
Blacks played no prominent role in America until the sixties, when America was essentially a white society (90%) and Detroit still was called the Paris of the Americas (now Brazzaville of the Americas would be more appropiate). I am sorry but I read somewhere that for war planning both the German and American high commands equated 1 Germans = 2 Americans. So if you add enough Americans, Russians, British you will finally beat Germany.
You do realize the definition of "white" in the 1940 census (and several following) included Jews, Hispanics, Slavs, and South/East Europeans, right? That almost all the millions of "white" immigrants to the U.S. in the 20th Century were Slavs and other South and Eastern Europeans.
The present day German is not a shadow of it's former self. The best and their genes died on the many battle fields of WW2. Just to tease you I give you from the hip fully random figures comparing military strength/1940:
Military:
1 German
2 Anglos
5 Slaves/Italians
10 Jews
100 Blacks
Ah, so we can finally do a calculation of the odds. Assuming the Finns were equal to Anglos (Nordic types, you know), and the other minor German allies were equal to Italians), the Axis in Europe has 81 + 45/5 + 3.5/2 + (13+6.7+9.3)/5 = 98 million German equivalents, disregarding captive populations. In Asia, as we have direct from Hitler that the Japanese were equal to Germans, and assuming other Asians were equivalent to Italians, that gives 83 million German equivalents in the Japanese Empire and in Thailand, yet again disregarding captive populations. That gives an Axis total of 181 million German equivalents in the Axis.
For the U.S, make the generous assumption that the 90% of the population that was "white" can be considered "Anglo," hoping that the albeit sadly racially mixed German-Americans can drag up all those Mexicans, Jews, and South/East Europeans. That gives 59 million German equivalents in the USA. The British Commonwealth adds ~35 million more German equivalents, with South Africa, of course, taking a big hit. The Soviet Union, assuming it's turkic and assorted native populations are also at the "Slav level" adds another 37 million German equivalents.
So all up, the Axis total of 181 million German equivalents, and the Allies, 131 million. Strange, the Axis clearly had greater racial fighting power. And of course, the ratio only gets worse once we include captive populations, because almost all that on the Allied side would be classified on your "black level," while so much of the Axis captive populationi would be at least at the "Anglo" level, possibly even the equal of the Germans...surely the Dutch would fit the latter?
How could the Axis have lost with so much more fighting power? Must have been their terrible leadership. If only they had...
Scheming/strategizing/lobbying:
1 Jew
2 Germans
3 Anglos
5 Slavs/Italians
- Blacks
...Jews as their leaders instead. After all, who cares about raw fighting ability in the modern age. War, like business, depends on the mind, and strategy trumps brute force anyday.
