I am really exhausted to explain again and again and again...
If you wish to keep the dispute of "natural" and "unnatural", present examples of what is "unnatural".
You pontificated, but you did not answer the challenges put to you.
Once again, you refuse to dispute direct questions and challenges to your opinion.
As to an example of "unnatural", since you either are not seeing the subtly or out-and-out ignoring it, I'll give it to you again step by step.
1. Since "unnatural" can be defined as:
lacking human qualities or sympathies; monstrous; inhuman: an obsessive and unnatural hatred.
(please note that the sentence "an obsessive and unnatural hatred" is an example in the use of the word, and not part of the definition)
2. You define "natural" as
natural
adjective
1 existing in or derived from nature; not made or caused by humankind
Then any example you give as "natural" can also be an example of "unnatural".
For instance, you example of this:
The Animal Homosexuality Myth
by Luiz Sérgio Solimeo
(...)
Like bonobos, other animals will mount another of the same sex and engage in seemingly "homosexual" behavior, although their motivation may differ. Dogs, for example, usually do so to express dominance. Cesar Ades, ethologist and professor of psychology at the University of S‹o Paulo, Brazil, explains, "When two males mate, what is present is a demonstration of power, not sex."[8]
Jacque Lynn Schultz, ASPCA Animal Sciences Director of Special Projects, explains further:
Usually, an un-neutered male dog will mount another male dog as a display of social dominance--in other words, as a way of letting the other dog know who's boss. While not as frequent, a female dog may mount for the same reason.[9]
In which you yourself bolded:
"When two males mate, what is present is a demonstration of power, not sex."
That, according to your definition, is "natural".
So it is "natural" for an adult male to mate, i.e. HAVE SEX WITH, a younger male when that younger male is trying to defy the adult male.
BY YOUR DEFINITION THAT IS NATURAL.
Further, the only purpose of organs is to procreate, and only heterosexual sex is "natural", it is natural for an adult male to impregnate a twelve year old girl because the sex that occurred was heterosexual and lead to procreation.
BY YOUR DEFINITION THAT IS NATURAL.
To keep going, since the only natural use of sex is procreation, then it is not natural for a couple (and in this example, it doesn't matter if the couple is female-female, or male-male or even female-male because the outcome will always be the same), who is paired for life has an argument, and one person of that couple wants to express affection, bonding and forgiveness to the other person by have sex with that person without any desire to procreate; even go as far as to take measure so procreation doesn't happen.
BY YOUR DEFINITION THAT IS NOT NATURAL.
You want me to give you an example of "unnatural", fine:
It is unnatural for a male to mate, i.e. HAVE SEX WITH, a younger male when that younger male is trying to defy the adult male.
It is unnatural for an adult male to impregnate a twelve year old girl even though the sex that occurred was heterosexual and lead to procreation.
Here's an example of natural:
A couple (and in this example, it doesn't matter if the couple is female-female, or male-male or even female-male, because the outcome will always be the same), who is paired for life has an argument, and one person of that couple wants to express affection, bonding and forgiveness to the other person by have sex with that person without any desire to procreate; even go as far as to take measure so procreation doesn't happen.
See? Any example you give as "natural" can be thrown right back as "unnatural".
Oh, and, by the way, I've answered your "sterile" question.
Natural. Happens to a lot living things. Especially when a living thing gets old.
I put it here again because it seems like you
missed ignored it.
