• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Chemical Engineer Mark Basile confirms Harrit nano-thermite results

All of the videos in this series have been excellent. This is an exemplary approach.
 
NIST could've saved millions of dollars with this approach: Do some lab tests, but don't publish them, and make a youtube video.

Who needs peer review when you have youtube?:rolleyes:

Exemplary indeed.
 
alienentity said:
NIST could've saved millions of dollars with this approach: Do some lab tests, but don't publish them, and make a youtube video.

Who needs peer review when you have youtube?:rolleyes:

Exemplary indeed.
Click to expand...
Agreed.
His examination was so amazing and fantastic we see don't need to see the careful documentation for his amazing claims.

Science at its finest. He's right about one thing, anyone can do this.
 
Last edited:
Who cares if there was a ten tonne heap of nano thermXte found on ground zero? It was not used and arguably could not be used in demolition as part of the actual observed collapse mechanisms.

Debate about thermXte is little more than a truther diversion. I am not waiting for any peer reviewed papers. They could produce a dozen of them.

What I will wait is an explanation of how it could possible have been used addressing two main issues:
1) How it was used to cut what structural members having what contribution to the collapse and why the natural processes needed assistance; AND
2) How "they" did it without getting caught or any evidence being left.

When some truther addresses either of those two I will start to pay attention. :rolleyes:

I'm not holding my breath. :)
 
I'll be impressed when truthers figure out that the whole nano/super/whatever thermXte theory was created to explain why there were no sounds consistent with cd charges. As of now the idiots are still calling it an explosive.
 
triforcharity said:
So, when do you expect it to appear in a peer-reviewed, respectable journal??

JO911S and Bentham are not peer-reviewed or respectable.
Click to expand...

I don't think he is interested in peer review, but it looks like he's leaning towards a Science Fair.

Mark Basile:
Yeah, yeah, well I was at a meeting the other night and somebody mentioned the idea of a science fair and that was the type of thing that came to mind for one way to possibly present these results basically to the general public.
Click to expand...
http://911blogger.com/node/20998
 
My favorite parts:

-Introduces thermate even though the claim they found nanothermite.

-Regurgitates Gage's BS claim about a thermite cutter charge patent; which Gage ultimately had to backpeddle from.

-Interchanges the Appendix C photos of WTC 7 with the towers because "jet fuel" can't melt steel.
 
RedIbis said:
All of the videos in this series have been excellent. This is an exemplary approach.
Click to expand...

Yes. The videos are excellent. Very nice job.

However, the research and evidence is pathetic and worthless.

Maybe the point of 9-11 Truth is to make Youtube videos?
 
"I would really like to stress that we need a lot more people involved in this work than just the few of us that are doing it right now. "
Click to expand...

Why? How many people does it take to analyze a sample of dust and write a competent report?
"Anyone can replicate the work that’s been done and confirm that this material is there."
Click to expand...
OK where can we get sample of the dust along with the chain of evidence that proves it is what it is purported to be?
 
if Truthers were soooo confident in their findings, they would present them to an esteemed institute of higher learning in the USA, so their work could be analyzed and confirmed.

and yet, this has not been done.

why? cause they have nothing.
 
Thunder said:
if Truthers were soooo confident in their findings, they would present them to an esteemed institute of higher learning in the USA, so their work could be analyzed and confirmed.

and yet, this has not been done.

why? cause they have nothing.
Click to expand...

Hell, I would accept it from just about ANY country!!
 
I stopped watching when the AE911 banner appeared. I've seen enough of their half baked case study work, I know better than to waste my time
 
Truthers dont need anything more substantial than someone that is apparently an expert telling them what they want to hear, if they do that in a youtube video its the perfect combination. Maybe he can even get on Alex Jones' radio show and he will have fulfilled the truther scientific procedure.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom