It's sad how JREF becomes a magnet for people who mistake a visceral hatred of Islam for skepticism and critical thinking![]()
indeed
It's sad how JREF becomes a magnet for people who mistake a visceral hatred of Islam for skepticism and critical thinking![]()
It's sad how JREF becomes a magnet for people who mistake a visceral hatred of Islam for skepticism and critical thinking![]()
Or how people dismiss critical thinking by calling it a visceral hatred of Islam. After all that doesn't require *any* thinking at all.
The Israeli report into the incident was biased too, it was overwhelmingly authored by people who have a significant Israeli bias - hence it cannot be trusted, not even worth discussing its content, it must be dismissed out of hand.
I suggest you familiarise yourself with Dan Rush's posts, friend![]()
This must be what you consider "critical thinking" right? Because Jews were involved in the report it must be dismissed right? Isn't that just so convenient? We can then just completely dismiss all the evidence on the grounds that it was presented by the Jewish side. No need to think at all!
I suggest you familiarize yourself with all the rest of the posts. OR point out who is calling them critical thinking. Just because some bigot posts anti-Islam slander doesn't mean they are being seen as critical thinking. They're just trolling.
I dunno if you've noticed, but we're on a discussion forum dedicated to critical thinking and scepticism and - in the same way that it tends to attract Jesus-freaks, holocaust deniers and 9/11 twoofers like flies to a carcass - it also attracts the occasional bigot who thinks that being sceptical about religion and having a raging case of visceral Islamophobia are the same thing. As our illustrious friend and colleague bigjelmapro would say; capiche?
Ah so now it's not just Islamic bigots, it's suddenly all facets. Funny how you don't seem to work both ways. When you have posts by people by Jane, Armstrong, and many others here who make pretty much the same kind of posts as dan does, you don't seem to raise this point.
While I don't agree with his posts, it's amusing to see someone using the same argument methods as many of the anti-Israeli arguers on here. And it's funny to see so many of them so offended by his ignorance yet not have a problem with their own arguments which are on the exact same level as his.
I think it's pretty clear what you were actually trying to imply.

I think it's pretty clear what you were actually trying to imply.
Make note that JJ doesn't have me on the ignore list for any reason outside of being completely inept in debating and rebutting anything I state.Go back and read post 4346. All I wish to say is in that post.
Make note that JJ doesn't have me on the ignore list for any reason outside of being completely inept in debating and rebutting anything I state.
Hehe, I was thinking the other way around. Who put who on the ignore list again?Sorry, did I hurt your feelings?
Hehe, I was thinking the other way around. Who put who on the ignore list again?
Go back a page, read some of the excerpts from the UNHRW report that are echoed from the other thread about the flotilla you've refused to address.
Then we can start moving forward...
If you have him on ignore, how is it you respond to his posts?Your previous post, in which you act as if your inventions are empirical reality, reminds me why I have you on ignore.
I hate to say it but the Palestinians are stupid walking bullet catching sand bags for the rest of the arab world.

The author of Post 4346 is currently on my ignore list.
Have you read any of the UN panel's report? I'm interested to know whether you dispute any of its contents.
Imagine a ship having KNIVES on board! You'd think they only used spoons in the galley![]()