Video Fakery in the 9/11 Attack

[Architect]

Ahem, people. Google is your friend. You're arguing with a no-planer who is pretending to be "new" to all of this, and surely that's simply not productive in the slightest.

Just saying.

12k posts over on Icke, a subtantial proportion of which appear to be "no plane". Not a good sign.

 

[beachnut]

Do wheels automatically drop down from a Boeing when they reach a certain altitude or does there need to some landing sequence engaged for that to happen?

I am just concerned that the while the metal of the strut seems to have been sheared, neither the rubber has been blown off or set on fire by the fireball.

Oh Illuminatium, Illuminatium.....why are you all so stupid?

A child could see through your stratagems.

Landing gear comes down when the pilot puts it down. There is a handle shaped like a tire, a lever, you lower it, the gear comes down. The terrorists were not landing, they were crashing, no need for a landing gear to be down.

Why would the rubber be on fire if it was ejected from the building? The tire looks like it was damaged badly, but I have flown large jet since 1976, I can tell by the photo, it is not airworthy. I assume you are not a pilot, or accident investigator. Maybe why you fall for the moronic lies of 911 truth, and make up false ideas without evidence or knowledge.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Yoo Hoo, Anders, we're still waiting for you over in the demolition thread!

You seem to have vanished around the time we established that (a) you didn't do research, and (b) pushed you to justify some statements about safety factors and the like......

I don't know much about the collapse of the buildings. It has been discussed for 9 years! So I don't think there is much more to examine, except perhaps the idea that NO demolition charges were used and instead that a giant explosion below the basement of each tower simulated a large earthquake to bring down the towers.

 

[beachnut]

I don't know much about the collapse of the buildings. It has been discussed for 9 years! So I don't think there is much more to examine, except perhaps the idea that NO demolition charges were used and instead that a giant explosion below the basement of each tower simulated a large earthquake to bring down the towers.

Moronic nonsense. A giant explosion would leave evidence. No evidence.

Why do you post these idiotic lies? What motivates someone to make up lies like you do?

No evidence of earthquakes large enough to bring down the WTC towers on 911. Failure again. You are not very good at making up lies.

 

[alienentity]

Yoo Hoo, Anders, we're still waiting for you over in the demolition thread!

You seem to have vanished around the time we established that (a) you didn't do research, and (b) pushed you to justify some statements about safety factors and the like......

Dealing with these characters is a bit like doing the weekly housekeeping chores: clean out the nooks and crannies to make sure the grime doesn't build up and encourage pests into the house.

Guess he sneaked over here hoping to get away from you
Maybe he needs a few more doses of RAID™

 

[Architect]

I don't know much about the collapse of the buildings. It has been discussed for 9 years! So I don't think there is much more to examine, except perhaps the idea that NO demolition charges were used and instead that a giant explosion below the basement of each tower simulated a large earthquake to bring down the towers.

So essentially you're MO is to make a lot of serious allegations of, frankly, murder against the USG but without - but your admission - any research and then run away when challenged?

 

[alienentity]

I don't know much about the collapse of the buildings. It has been discussed for 9 years! So I don't think there is much more to examine, except perhaps the idea that NO demolition charges were used and instead that a giant explosion below the basement of each tower simulated a large earthquake to bring down the towers.

I made a couple of videos a while back after encountering a 'no planer'. I just couldn't believe that someone could be that stupid, but I was sadly mistaken - indeed he was.

You may find it interesting just for the fact that there are a few images of the hub and tire showing damage. The metal parts seem to be heavily damaged, even partly destroyed, yet the tire has more or less retained its shape.
I guess that's because rubber can deform and is elastic.....would've thunk it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FikCPt9eAd4

Goto my channel for the next video - there are two in the series. Unless you're borderline insane or just insane, you should give this stuff up asap. It's really pathetic nonsense.

 

[Anders Lindman]

So essentially you're MO is to make a lot of serious allegations of, frankly, murder against the USG but without - but your admission - any research and then run away when challenged?

I don't think the U.S. government was involved. It was a small shadowy part of the U.S. (and possibly also foreign) power structures who planned, staged and carried out the initial false flag operation. Very few people involved. The massive cover-up that was needed after that was left to the U.S. government to deal with, even though they were innocent as far as the actual 9/11 attack was concerned.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Ahem, people. Google is your friend. You're arguing with a no-planer who is pretending to be "new" to all of this, and surely that's simply not productive in the slightest.

Just saying.

We're like the monkeys in the cocaine addiction experiment.

If we push Ander's and Rabbit's buttons a thousand times, a stundie nomination will pop out.

 

[Anders Lindman]

Those who carried out the 9/11 Attack were control freaks of monstrous proportions. Which means that they wanted to control as FEW things as possible. How many things did they need to control if no planes were involved? And make no mistake, these guys don't calculate with risk, they operate based on ZERO risk.

 

[Architect]

And yet strangely you arrive at this conclusion without any research and whilst making up "facts" like the designed safety factor (an essentially meaningless term, btw) of the WTC?

 

[CompusMentus]

I don't think the U.S. government was involved. It was a small shadowy part of the U.S. (and possibly also foreign) power structures who planned, staged and carried out the initial false flag operation. Very few people involved. The massive cover-up that was needed after that was left to the U.S. government to deal with, even though they were innocent as far as the actual 9/11 attack was concerned.

MY bold

OK let's run with this....

"Very few people involved."

"Very few" meaning the Airline corporations? The first responder agencies? Federal aviation control? Many branches of the US military? The myriad of media interests? The dozens of people who filmed/photographed the plane impacts? The hundreds of people who must have witnessed the plane impacts? All of these and I guess many others would have to have "planned, staged and carried out" the attacks if your imbecilic CT was true.

What say you?

Compus

 

[Anders Lindman]

And yet strangely you arrive at this conclusion without any research and whilst making up "facts" like the designed safety factor (an essentially meaningless term, btw) of the WTC?

Here is an example of control-freakishness a la extraordinaire:

People may think that the below video is an amateur video. Few things could be further from the truth. How could the camera operator shooting this video direct the camera towards the plane BEFORE the fireball explosion if there were no plane? Impossible? Incredible random chance? No. Extreme timing? Yes.

Watch at the moment the camera operator suddenly quickly moves the camera towards the plane at around 00:09 in the video. Notice the light flash that appears in the area of the tower indicated in the below picture. That's the time marker for when to start moving the camera to simulate directing it towards a plane.

There are even two light flashes before that, one around 00:03 and the second around 00:06, so that the camera operator is prepared for exactly when the third flash will come to avoid having to act from reflex reaction alone. The last flash even has a click sound in order to not having to rely only on light signals.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3iKLz4oatY

Now, that's what I call beforehand planned operation and not some random amateur recording.

 

[Anders Lindman]

MY bold

OK let's run with this....

"Very few people involved."

"Very few" meaning the Airline corporations? The first responder agencies? Federal aviation control? Many branches of the US military? The myriad of media interests? The dozens of people who filmed/photographed the plane impacts? The hundreds of people who must have witnessed the plane impacts? All of these and I guess many others would have to have "planned, staged and carried out" the attacks if your imbecilic CT was true.

What say you?

Compus

I have no clue frankly.

 

[Anders Lindman]

This is getting spooky. I'm backing off. Someone else will have to look further into this.

 

[CompusMentus]

I have no clue frankly.

You said it.

Compus

 

[fitzgibbon]

I'd second it

 

[Hans]

I'll thrice it - for grins and giggles

 

[BigAl]

I have no clue frankly.

That's all she wrote.

 

[T.A.M.]

I have no clue frankly.

You are, for the first time, CORRECT.

Anders, give it up...you are a minnow in the shark pond. You are being eaten alive, and it is only going to get worse. LGR is not much better.

1. Yes the tire could have remained intact. It is quite easy to picture the plane hitting the facade, the metal and what not of the plane sheering off as it hit the outer portion, and columns. In particular, if this was the front landing gear, it would have avoided the fire ball caused by the fuel IN THE WINGS, as it continued to move forward.

2. Any flash you see is either (A) sunlight (B) Camera glitch, or something else...it is not some secret signal or anything else related to the evil camera man.

TAM