• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Coast to Coast AM Debate, August 21 2010

So you're saying they brought down the WTC7 in order to hide highly classified air conditioning equipment?

There should be absolutely no way that there is no footage from the air of the collapse of WTC7. That must mean that when the Penthouses were deliberately dropped into the building that fact was plain to see from the air. It's almost like proof you see .

Hey folks...and if you think this notion has mileage as it certainly appears to have consider this. It was silent.
 
Last edited:
Everyone knows the NWO's world headquarters was located in WTC7 and their super-secret documents housed in the east mechanical penthouse.

Nothing like a noisy, dirty room for super secret documents.
 
Nothing like a noisy, dirty room for super secret documents.

Surely you are not still going on about those red herrings ? The secret Enron documents and the FBI office and all that crap ? Jeez tsig..
 
Last edited:
What in your opinion makes an industrial scale air conditioning unit a more effective means of destroying documents than a paper shredder?

I gave up discussing red herrings like that long ago SOT.

Do you have any amusing reasons why there is no helicopter news footage of the collapse of WTC7 ?
 
Last edited:
I gave up discussing red herrings like that long ago SOT.

You are the only member of the twoof movement who does not believe that documents inside WTC7 have nothing to do with its demise.

Do you have any amusing reasons why there is no helicopter news footage of the collapse of WTC7 ?

The airspace was closed. No one allowed but NORAD.
 
Last edited:
You are the only member of the twoof movement who does not believe that documents inside WTC7 have nothing to do with its demise.



No helicopter was in a position to get a clear shot at the time of its collapse.

Or they could have just been looking the other way. There was only a 16 second window for someone to notice something and tell the cameraman to get on it.

I am just ahead of the curve a little.

SOT never fails me ...
 
But AE it is plainly obvious that the Penthouses were deliberately targetted. Why else would the very strongest column in the building give way first ? Column 79 is said to have weighed around 350 tons in total over the 47 floors. To assume that it would give way before dozens of lighter columns did makes no sense at all.

The core was targetted first so the walls would fall inwards to form a neat(ish) little pile. The penthouses just happened to be supported by the core.
 
The core was targetted first so the walls would fall inwards to form a neat(ish) little pile. The penthouses just happened to be supported by the core.
by fire

You guys are a trip. Make up some more idiotic ideas, I need some comedy relief.
 
But AE it is plainly obvious that the Penthouses were deliberately targetted. Why else would the very strongest column in the building give way first ? Column 79 is said to have weighed around 350 tons in total over the 47 floors. To assume that it would give way before dozens of lighter columns did makes no sense at all.

The only real answer is that they wanted the Penthouses and what was inside them to be hidden under the rubble of the Global collapse. That's probably why there is no aerial photography of the collapse of WTC7 despite the abundance of news helicopters and the fact that they were actually expecting the collapse.

Surely you are not still going on about those red herrings ? The secret Enron documents and the FBI office and all that crap ? Jeez tsig..


You seem to be the one that landed those fish.
 
The core was targetted first so the walls would fall inwards to form a neat(ish) little pile. The penthouses just happened to be supported by the core.

I might go with that had the Penthouses been centrally located on the building. That way there might be some chance, But considering that the Penthouses were well over to one side what you are saying would have to mean a progressive collapse a la Shy Sunder. Have a look in the video at the 1:20 mark and see if you see signs of a progressive collapse ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5MGdWNYLGc&feature=player_embedded#!
 
C7 said:
How can the lower floors of the north wall have fallen away before the north face falls at FFA?
Easy. The core structure collapsed before the outer walls fell, taking lower sections of wall with it at some point.
Wrong!
Read the final report. That is NOT what NIST says happened. Show where NIST says what you claim or stop making that claim.
You are ignoring the computer simulation that clearly shows the exterior walls folding up.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php...&postcount=814
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom