• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Boy Scouts

I've told my story of how I left scouts shortly after the scoutmaster's sons banished a scout from an ongoing camp trip for refusing to do their dishes. Even though the troop I temporarily belonged to was horribly run, religion didn't seem to come into it much.

The sons banished a scout? How did that work exactly? Some kind of mutual-scout segregation and punishment? Or were the sons older and adult leaders themselves?

I don't know your story, so I'd be interested in hearing it.

As with any organization locally operated, I would imagine as many people who have good experiences with Scouting, there are also a number of stories about how power was abused or Scouts were mistreated.
 
This pic was taken in local scout hall at my friend´s wedding reception.He´s the one holding the glass.It was a costume wedding,but their ordinary clothes don´t look much different.These two are the scoutmasters,and my pal is a school governor too.I strongly suspect that they would not be allowed anywhere near scouts in the States.We have moved on a bit.Anticipating smartass comments,I will add that they are both wonderful people and respected in the local community.

 
The anti-homosexual stand was the hardest for me to get past to have my son join. The Scouts will not allow a homosexual to be Scout Master and I assume they wouldn't let a boy join the troop.

I had a look at the UK Scouting web-site, and couldn't see anything about sexual orientation, for leaders or scouts, but perhaps I didn't look hard enough.

All leaders (in fact anyone working with children, just about) are checked by the police for anything in their background that might disqualify them from working with children, but that is confined to the records the police hold, if any (CRB check; current and spent convictions, cautions, reprimands and warnings held on the Police National Computer, plus any relevant and proportionate information held by the local police forces, and a check of the new Children and or Vulnerable Adults barred lists where requested).

I wonder what happens at international scout camps hosted in the US when gay leaders from other countries (and I'm pretty sure there will be some from other European countries, if not the UK) turn up.

Anyway, I guess my point is that the problems seem to be specifically with the BSA, rather than the scouting movement in general.
 
The sons banished a scout? How did that work exactly? Some kind of mutual-scout segregation and punishment? Or were the sons older and adult leaders themselves?

I don't know your story, so I'd be interested in hearing it.

As with any organization locally operated, I would imagine as many people who have good experiences with Scouting, there are also a number of stories about how power was abused or Scouts were mistreated.

The troop was run in a rough-and-tumble, beat-the-****-outta-eachother vein that was a lot of fun at first, but tended to get out of hand. The Scoutmaster was the local environmental police officer and his sons were two of the oldest and biggest scouts (not leaders) in the troop. They were also something of a pair of bullies who liked to boss others around and occasionally stole other people's stuff (I remember one stole a knife from a kid whittling a stick because he said it was being used inappropriately).

There was a kind of cliquish hierarchy with the sons on top, their friends underneath, and the rest of the troop below that. Now, that wasn't a problem most of the time, because it's a scout troop, not Lord of the Flies. There's only so much trouble you can get up to when you're dealing with largely structured meetings. You might get a few extra punches and elbows during the recreation time (read 'brawl disguised as rugby/British bulldog') at the end of meetings, but most of us found that kind of exciting. We came from a Weeblo group that did stickfights instead of campfire stories, so the group as a whole had already self-selected for people who didn't mind that stuff, although in retrospect it was probably irresponsible of the troop leaders to let us do the stuff we did (naming our patrol "Pyros" probably should have set off some red flags too, but that's a different story).

That's the background. The event that was the revelation for me that this was not a group I should be with came during a camping trip to some private land the owner let us use. We were maybe an hour's walk into the woods where we set up camp. Nothing out of the ordinary happened until dinner. We all had brought our own supplies and we built our own fires to cook them over. After we'd eaten we were supposed to wash and repack our gear.

One of the sons decided that a younger scout who was a foot shorter and easily 50-80 pounds smaller should wash his gear for him. The younger scout refused. The son started pushing and shouting at him. From where I was standing I couldn't see clearly, but I think he threw a punch because the scout started crying.

At this point the other son came over and they both started screaming at him for being a wuss and that he should get the **** out. The scout started grabbing his stuff but they pushed him away and told him to get out right now and don't come back. So the scout ran off into the woods with none of his gear. Remember, this was in the age before cell phones so he had no way to call for a ride or help.

It wasn't my shining moment because I didn't stand up and help, but the scoutmaster was in his tent and had to have heard this happen and the sons and their friends were bigger and stronger than me and my friends and I was too scared to do anything about it.

I quit shortly after that because that was way over the line of what I found acceptable. The scout found his way home somehow, but if he had gotten lost or hurt on the way, it could have been dangerous and I didn't want to be a part of an organization that would let that happen.
 
Last edited:
I had a look at the UK Scouting web-site, and couldn't see anything about sexual orientation, for leaders or scouts, but perhaps I didn't look hard enough.

All leaders (in fact anyone working with children, just about) are checked by the police for anything in their background that might disqualify them from working with children, but that is confined to the records the police hold, if any (CRB check; current and spent convictions, cautions, reprimands and warnings held on the Police National Computer, plus any relevant and proportionate information held by the local police forces, and a check of the new Children and or Vulnerable Adults barred lists where requested).

I wonder what happens at international scout camps hosted in the US when gay leaders from other countries (and I'm pretty sure there will be some from other European countries, if not the UK) turn up.

Anyway, I guess my point is that the problems seem to be specifically with the BSA, rather than the scouting movement in general.

Well, I'm pretty sure it's still the case. There was a law suit a few years ago initiated by a gay Scout Master who was thrown out of scouts once his sexual orientation was known. He lost the case since the Scouts is a private group and can restrict membership as they deem fit.
 
That was basically a response to the tone of both you and Meadmaker - it's not perfect but it's a great experience.

Then you’ll also have noted where I said Boy Scouts was not for everyone? Because I did say that, and I fully understand that some people have had very bad experiences in Scouting for any number of reasons. Some people have had very bad experiences camping, but would I suggest that they go? Well, yeah, if it’s something you’re interested in, you should probably give it a shot. Just because there have been people who didn’t agree with the camping concept, doesn’t mean that you should curtail your enthusiasm for the idea.

The same holds here for Boy Scouts. If you’re not interested in allowing your son to pursue Boy Scouts, that’s completely understandable. But that’s not going to stop me from expressing the idea that some boys get a great deal from the experience, and that the organization, on the whole, is a good one.

I am sure you had great experiences, I am sure plenty of boys can attribute good qualities to their time in boyscouts. I would overlook their ideas but in order for my son to have those types of experiences he would have to lie while taking his oath.

You probably should review the Scout Oath then:

On my honor, I will do my best to do my duty to God an my country, and to obey the Scout Law. To help other people at all times, to keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight. [emphasis added]​

While I am certain your son is a fine, upstanding young man, just as both of mine are (though one hasn’t learned to stand, much less sit up, yet), I would be highly skeptical of him doing his duty to his country at all times. I would also be interested to know if he actually lends assistance to all people at all times, or if this cuts into his workout schedule at the gym while he attempts to keep himself “physically strong”. I’d be interested to know how he manages to be “mentally awake” during all hours of the day, especially with all that helping other people “at all times” and the previous mentioned gym schedule? Or does he find that, like most youth his age, the growing up, hormone changes, rewiring of his adolescent brain into its adult state, school schedule, extracurricular activities, etc., sometimes leave him run down? And what does he consider to be “morally straight”? Is this the same as what you consider to be morally straight, or is it slightly different? Which morally straight does he follow, and does he follow it at all times in all cases, or does he find that there are certain situations where he adapts his moral code to fit the circumstances?

And let us not forget the Scout Law, mentioned within the oath:

A Scout Is:
Trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, clean, brave, and reverent.​

I’ll forgo the bulk of this list, as obviously no child could ever be all these things at all times. But I would like to ask just how obedient your son is to you and (I assume) his mother? Does he do all his chores without ever losing that “friendly, courteous” air that a Scout must maintain? Do you have to remind him about his cleaning his room, or is he always helpful in this regard, loyal to each of your rules in all cases at all times?

Sarcasm aside here, the key words I highlighted above within the Scout Oath are just that: key words. A Scout promises to do their best, but it is clearly understood that no Scout is perfect (except for when my son joins Scouting, and then I fully anticipate that the BSA will award him his Eagle on the spot). If a Scout doesn’t have a God(s), then it’s clear they have no duty to be met, so that part of the Scout Oath can hardly be considered broken. On the other hand, if your son breaks other parts of the oaths in small or big ways, are you still willing to overlook them? Or is your only complaint the issue with religion, and if so, why not the other parts?

I never said hatespeech, as a matter of fact hatespeech isn't even a crime in my book. However, when you teach 11yr old minds that you need religion to be good and homosexuals can't be trusted around young boys, it plants a seed in their minds.

No, you didn’t say those things, and I didn’t say you did. But regardless of my being pedantic on this point, you should be aware that you’re conflating the issue: there is no teaching of bigotry or homophobia involved in Scouting. There is nothing within the Boy Scout Handbook which teaches homophobia, hate speech, or bigotry. This is a policy of the BSA at the top of the organization, which typically impacts adult leaders who are “avowed” (known, out, found-out, etc.) homosexuals. It is an idiotic practice, and many at the top of the BSA Councils are continually attempting to get this changed, both in regards to religion and in regards to homosexuality. It can be an issue depending on the unit leadership. It can also be an issue in almost any other part of society that you or your son chooses to participate.

At the unit level, there has never been a merit-badge for heterosexuality or “correct marital relationships”. Religious awards are not only not required, but have no impact on rank advancement and are not emphasized by the BSA (and it sounds like not emphasized by any other Scouting organization in other countries). In general, there’s actually a lack of emphasis on this part of Scouting. Such awards must be earned through the sponsoring religious organization themselves.

I agree with you, and previously stated, that the BSA is completely backward in regards to their policies on these matters. But the reality of Scouting, the Oath, the Law and the stated policies of Scouting do not generally correlate. They certainly, at least in my experience, do not teach homophobia, intolerance, or bigotry.
 
It wasn't my shining moment because I didn't stand up and help, but the scoutmaster was in his tent and had to have heard this happen and the sons and their friends were bigger and stronger than me and my friends and I was too scared to do anything about it.

I quit shortly after that because that was way over the line of what I found acceptable. The scout found his way home somehow, but if he had gotten lost or hurt on the way, it could have been dangerous and I didn't want to be a part of an organization that would let that happen.

It sounds to me as if this was before the policy of two-deep leadership, is that correct? There were no other adult leaders in the camp? I don’t know when this policy was begun within the BSA, but I do know that it was as a direct result from the abuse of Scouts, specifically sexual abuse, but certainly physical also. Correct Scouting now requires two adult leaders to be present at all times, especially on camping trips. This is for protection of both the leaders (less so) and the boys (more so).

The Scoutmaster was certainly reprehensible and irresponsible on a number of levels, first in not maintaining control over his own boys, and second for a lack of concern on the part of a younger, smaller Scout. Older boys are supposed to be the role models for the younger boys, and help them out, not abuse their positions of authority, and certainly not to get physically violent with them. He definitely displayed a complete lack of responsibility when he allowed his sons to abuse any other Scout, and definitely when he showed a lack of concern for the well-being of a boy under his care on a camping trip.

I don’t know what I would have done in your circumstances, but probably just as you did. I was a younger, smaller scout than most of the others in my troop, and even other boys my age were typically bigger and stronger than me.

It sounds like the culture of the troop was the problem, and the Scoutmaster wasn’t doing anything to change that. That is indeed a very unfortunate story, and it’s one of the reasons that I am still in Scouting: to prevent things like this from happening.

Well, I'm pretty sure it's still the case. There was a law suit a few years ago initiated by a gay Scout Master who was thrown out of scouts once his sexual orientation was known. He lost the case since the Scouts is a private group and can restrict membership as they deem fit.

But there are ongoing lawsuits brought by a number of organizations in regards to BSA being a discriminatory organization, but still receiving public funding and support. This is a backdoor method of attempting to get the BSA to change their policies, or otherwise cause them pain for maintaining these practices.
 
Last edited:
It sounds to me as if this was before the policy of two-deep leadership, is that correct? There were no other adult leaders in the camp?

I really don't know. There were 3 scout leaders total, there might have been another leader on the camping trip but I don't know where he was when this was happening.
 
Rob Roy I honestly believe that you take everything I say as picking a fight with just you. If he took the oath and then they found out about us being atheists and/or gay, they would kick him out regardless of how well he followed up on his promise to do his best. I have a personal issue with that policy. While it may not be for everyone, everyone is also not welcome to join. They are exclusionary to those who subscribe to a lifestyle/belief that they disagree with. You say it's flawed, I say it's worse than flawed. I am not saying you are saying anything else wrong or disagreeing with anything else you are saying.
 
Last edited:
I really don't know. There were 3 scout leaders total, there might have been another leader on the camping trip but I don't know where he was when this was happening.

That’s definitely unfortunate. I’m sure there are units even today that suffer from these issues, and that don’t adhere to the two-deep leadership and other policies put in place. The BSA has certainly attempted to keep Scouts safe and Scouting fun, but they can’t enforce it in every instance, even though I wish they would.

Rob Roy I honestly believe that you take everything I say as picking a fight with just you.

Not at all. I’m honestly interested in your responses to my arguments and discussion. If this were “picking a fight” I’d have called you pedantic by now, rather than myself! :D

(For the record though, I haven't seen you being pedantic.)

Seriously though, within this thread there were questions asked, and issues brought up, which I have attempted to address, discuss, or correct as I understand them and the facts. I think you are misrepresenting, though not deliberately, the BSA in certain aspects given your issues toward religion. If you’d care to discuss this further, I’m certainly more than willing to continue. I can come across, at times, as being argumentative, but I assure you, especially here, that is not the case.

I’ll openly admit to being a proponent for the BSA and the Scouting program in general. I do see where they have issues, and I have put what little clout I have into prompting change. I see the higher Councils attempting this, and I feel it’s only a matter of time before the BSA reverses itself on these issues, and becomes a truly inclusive organization. But that is, again, that’s just my opinion, flawed, or deeply-flawed as it may be.

If he took the oath and then they found out about us being atheists and/or gay, they would kick him out regardless of how well he followed up on his promise to do his best. I have a personal issue with that policy. While it may not be for everyone, everyone is also not welcome to join. They are exclusionary to those who subscribe to a lifestyle/belief that they disagree with. You say it's flawed, I say it's worse than flawed.

Not to argue, since clearly you think that’s all I’m doing here, but how is the BSA worse than flawed? Are they unfixable?

These are serious questions that I’m interested in your opinion and view on, especially in light of information previous presented. I’m going to restrain myself from offering pre-arguments, though . . . it’s getting . . . hard to do. :)

I am not saying you are saying anything else wrong or disagreeing with anything else you are saying.

Sorry, I have no idea what this was meant to mean.
 
Last edited:
Not to argue, since clearly you think that’s all I’m doing here, but how is the BSA worse than flawed? Are they unfixable?
They are bigoted. Most people do not want to associate with groups that denigrate a class of people. Would you join an organization that only allowed whites?

They are hurting lives. What boy at aged 10 is going to know that he is gay, or is going to come to lose his religion in a few years? Some, sure, but not many. I still believed at 10, but by 14 or so no longer believed. I would have been tossed out. And don't tell me that doesn't happen - google gives ample examples of such.

Anyway, I'm off to my all white golf club. Don't give me a hard time about it, they do good things for the community, and heck, they allow hispanics to work in the kitchen, so what are they complaining about anyway?

In other words, in a lot of people's opinions, we have to stand up to bigotry, not make excuses for it. BSA gets away with it because people, good people like you, let them get away with it. That's how most evil in the world happens.
 
For the folks here who are atheist and participate in the Scouts (BSA) as adult leaders, how did you justify to yourself joining an organization which explicitly says (even on the membership application) that you're not allowed to join?

I haven't joined for just that reason. On the other hand, I would like to be involved with my son's Troop, so I go on campouts and participate otherwise, just not as an official BSA leader. I'm strongly considering just holding my nose and signing the form, but if I do that I will insist on being not hiding my lack of belief from others in the Troop.
 
They are bigoted. Most people do not want to associate with groups that denigrate a class of people. Would you join an organization that only allowed whites?

They are hurting lives. What boy at aged 10 is going to know that he is gay, or is going to come to lose his religion in a few years? Some, sure, but not many. I still believed at 10, but by 14 or so no longer believed. I would have been tossed out. And don't tell me that doesn't happen - google gives ample examples of such.

Anyway, I'm off to my all white golf club. Don't give me a hard time about it, they do good things for the community, and heck, they allow hispanics to work in the kitchen, so what are they complaining about anyway?

In other words, in a lot of people's opinions, we have to stand up to bigotry, not make excuses for it. BSA gets away with it because people, good people like you, let them get away with it. That's how most evil in the world happens.

Excuse me?

No, better yet, don’t excuse me.

Clearly you’ve jumped into the end of a thread and haven’t bothered to read anything that I or anyone else has written prior to this point. I have not made excuses for the BSA, and you will not, kindly otherwise, make such claims unless you can back them up with actual evidence.

If you want to engage in an actual discussion, feel free to offer your apologies, read the entire thread and then come back to the with your arguments, rather than asserting something that has no basis. Otherwise, I have absolutely nothing further to say to you on this matter.
 
Last edited:
I read everything everyone wrote in here. Such as " I am aware of them now, but I see that the organization does a lot of good for a lot of kids" and "and that the organization, on the whole, is a good one." To me, that is making excuses. If you'd like a different term, that's fine. My point is that a lot of people feel that organizations like these should not be worked with, hoping for change, but denounced and held up for exposure and ridicule.

My all white golf club does good, and is on the whole, good. Think I should still be a member? I think if I really said such a thing, and belonged to such an organization, I'd just be making excuses.
 
Last edited:
I read everything everyone wrote in here. Such as " I am aware of them now, but I see that the organization does a lot of good for a lot of kids" and "and that the organization, on the whole, is a good one." To me, that is making excuses.

Thank you for making your view clear. Clearly we have nothing further to discuss in regards to this matter.
 
For the folks here who are atheist and participate in the Scouts (BSA) as adult leaders, how did you justify to yourself joining an organization which explicitly says (even on the membership application) that you're not allowed to join?

Again------it takes jumping through some serious mental hoops to pull that off. But then again, I could care less who they are bigoted against, as long as they don't do it with tax money or privileged access to public facilities. But whether or not you support the BSA, here is an excellent article on the subject that sums up the conundrum for non-believers and gays-------------

http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2010/02/boy-scouts-at-100-years/3/

And no---I refuse to support the BSA for any reason until they drop their bigoted policies, and change their oath. Then, and only then, will I reconsider. There are plenty of other community service organizations I can contribute to that don't do the bigot thing.

I have also seen web articles that detail the loss of numbers of BSA over the last decade, in part, due to such policies. They are becoming increasingly irrelevant to our society, and it's largely due to shooting themselves in the foot with krap like this. Hopefully they will wake up and smell the coffee before they vanish from the radar. I was a Cub Scout very briefly as a child, and I would hate to see that experience go away for future generations because the organization can't pull itself out of the last century and get with reality.
 
This thread has devolved into a discussion of the relative merits of the BSA. That is not the concern of the OP; rather, the issue is letting the BSA use classroom time to proselytize to get members.

I think it is very wrong, especially since it is classroom time. I MIGHT feel differently about it if it was an after-school meeting but academic time is so limited now anyways that taking more of it for the BSA is a real waste.

I agree with this:

Write a letter of complaint. And then be ready to file suit. You might want to get a lawyer's advice before writing the letter and mention that you have one ready to back you up.

... and the lawyer to get assistance from is the legal beagles at the FFRF. They've helped other people in a similar situation. In fact, before writing your letter of complaint, I'd suggest talking to them. They can tell you what to say to be most effective.
 
The Scouts will not allow a homosexual to be Scout Master and I assume they wouldn't let a boy join the troop.

I would be extremely surprised if the prohibition against homosexuals applied to the scouts themselves. As far as I know, it applies only to leaders. I'll try and look it up.
I will say that the scout master has said that it doesn't matter what the Scouts say, our troop would not discriminate against anyone who is gay.

I am fairly certain that would be the same in most troops.
 
For the folks here who are atheist and participate in the Scouts (BSA) as adult leaders, how did you justify to yourself joining an organization which explicitly says (even on the membership application) that you're not allowed to join?

I'm hoping to cause subversion from within. Sort of an infiltrator, or spy.

That's at least partially serious. If my troop were to ever practice the sort of discrimination that BSA policy actually calls for, I would raise holy hell about it. I don't expect to ever have to do that, but I will if necessary. Meanwhile, being in the organization I can influence it. If I were to take a self righteous stand that I couldn't possibly join an organization whose principles I disagree with, I wouldn't be able to do that.

If there were some other organization out there that was as effective in doing what the scouts do, maybe I would join that organization. I don't know of any such group.

(I doubt that it matters, but technically, I haven't done it yet. I've volunteered to be a merit badge counselor and taken the training, but I haven't signed the paperwork)
 

Back
Top Bottom