Non Americans. Why do you fight 9/11 deniers and terrorist apologists?

[dafydd]

He was.
at a 911 denier level...

911 dingbats tend to have problems with big words.

 

[Java Man]

No links then?

You're the master of search. Can't you find them?

Better yet, can't you remember all the times beachnut has called me a terrorist or terrorist apologist? Are you even keeping up with the threads?

 

[T.A.M.]

Actually more like a label placed on people who doubt in anyway the "official story". A very common and age old tactic of round them up and label them all the same to simplify the task of debunking. Thus making it easy for a great deal of "debunkers" to arbitrarily label someone as Truther and then discredit him/her without actually providing a valid support or much less so a valid reasoning.

Accusing one of being a terrorist or doubting one's professional skills and loud speaking arguments thinking that they'll stick because they sound reasonable enough. But quickly backpedal and reduce the importance of their own championed arguments when they're confronted by analysis.

Anything like this rings a bell by any chance?

Yah it sounds like the tactic taken by every truther i know.

 

[beachnut]

You're the master of search. Can't you find them?

Better yet, can't you remember all the times beachnut has called me a terrorist or terrorist apologist? Are you even keeping up with the threads?

You are off topic, a tactic used by 911 truth when they have no evidence (all of time) to back their failed delusions.

You can't be a terrorists they tell the truth about 911 and don't need your apologies for them. Terrorists take credit for 911 911 truth takes 8 years to fail at greater levels of incompetence. There is nothing to support 911 truth.

The topic is about non-Americans fighting the lies. The lies you poorly support that 911 truth manufactures to fool people into believing half-baked conspiracy theories on 911. People who are lazy and lack knowledge on 911 may fall for the lies you can't support with facts and evidence.

911 truthers are unable to get on topic in this thread, they are the topic.

Why? I flew heavy (large) jets and when I heard the idiotic lies about the flying done of 911 being impossible, I had to look at why people might be dumb enough (lack knowledge, experience and research skills) to fall for lies so easy to figure out. Interesting to see why other people in other countries were interested in the lies and delusions of 911 truth.

Given 8 years to figure out 911, why do weakly support 911 truth by posting off topic nonsense? Bet you next post will not be on topic in this thread.

 

[BaaBaa]

He was.
at a 911 denier level...

Ohh, snap!

 

[bikerdruid]

having read through the thread, i'm truly astounded that there are still seemingly rational people that still believe the 'official story'.
but, hey, i'm new here...and easily amazed.

 

[TexasJack]

having read through the thread, i'm truly astounded that there are still seemingly rational people that still believe the 'official story'.
but, hey, i'm new here...and easily amazed.

I suppose you believe in Bigfoot? Is Elvis Still alive? Why don't you tell us what happened on 9/11?

 

[bikerdruid]

I suppose you believe in Bigfoot? Is Elvis Still alive? Why don't you tell us what happened on 9/11?

interesting...in the bigfoot thread, i was questioned about 911.
here, you question me about bigfoot.

irony abounds....

actually, i have no opinion about bigfoot. it's a pretty cool story, though..myth? maybe...but so was troy, at one time.
but i certainly know the 911 official story is a myth.

 

[TexasJack]

but i certainly know the 911 official story is a myth.

And you know this how?

 

[MG1962]

interesting...in the bigfoot thread, i was questioned about 911.
here, you question me about bigfoot.

irony abounds....

actually, i have no opinion about bigfoot. it's a pretty cool story, though..myth? maybe...but so was troy, at one time.
but i certainly know the 911 official story is a myth.

As Troy was once a myth

 

[Furcifer]

interesting...in the bigfoot thread, i was questioned about 911.
here, you question me about bigfoot.

irony abounds....

actually, i have no opinion about bigfoot. it's a pretty cool story, though..myth? maybe...but so was troy, at one time.
but i certainly know the 911 official story is a myth.

You don't even know what irony means, how do you know about complicated things like progressive collapse?

i-ro-ny- the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: the irony of her reply, “How nice!” when I said I had to work all weekend.

Brilliant post by the way.

Welcome to the forum!

 

[bikerdruid]

You don't even know what irony means, how do you know about complicated things like progressive collapse?

i-ro-ny- the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning: the irony of her reply, “How nice!” when I said I had to work all weekend.

Brilliant post by the way.

Welcome to the forum!

you defined verbal irony..not situational.
thanks for the welcome.

 

[TokenMac]

having read through the thread, i'm truly astounded that there are still seemingly rational people that still believe the 'official story'.
but, hey, i'm new here...and easily amazed.

I see similar comments from a lot of 9/11 CTist, which makes me wonder do you only hang out with other CTist or are you just trying to be cute?

ETA
Welcome to the forum, if you want to discuss what you believe happened on 9/11 could you please visit the thread below first.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=149321&highlight=Theory

 

[Furcifer]

you defined verbal irony..not situational.
thanks for the welcome.

Even then, it's logical to assume if you subscribe to one fantasy you subscribe to them all. (I don't think the IPCC predictions on climate change are necessarily accurate, I get compared to a Truther, it comes with the territory)

In any event, please expand on your observation of the thread thus far. You were saying it's hard to believe the entire rational world feels the official narrative of 9/11 is correct, based in fact and scientific observation. You were about to offer proof to the contrary I believe.

Carry on.

 

[dafydd]

interesting...in the bigfoot thread, i was questioned about 911.
here, you question me about bigfoot.

irony abounds....

actually, i have no opinion about bigfoot. it's a pretty cool story, though..myth? maybe...but so was troy, at one time.
but i certainly know the 911 official story is a myth.

Did this knowledge come in a dream? Or perhaps you have proof?

 

[funk de fino]

Because I hate cowardly and filthy liars and most members of the 911 TM seem to that way inclined. If not that, then dumb as hell or suffering mental issues. I don't hate those ones.

 

[Andy_Ross]

interesting...in the bigfoot thread, i was questioned about 911.
here, you question me about bigfoot.

irony abounds....

actually, i have no opinion about bigfoot. it's a pretty cool story, though..myth? maybe...but so was troy, at one time.
but i certainly know the 911 official story is a myth.

So offer some support for your belief, if you have nothing more than an opinion why should we take any notice?

 

[triforcharity]

Actually more like a label placed on people who doubt in anyway the "official story". A very common and age old tactic of round them up and label them all the same to simplify the task of debunking. Thus making it easy for a great deal of "debunkers" to arbitrarily label someone as Truther and then discredit him/her without actually providing a valid support or much less so a valid reasoning.

Accusing one of being a terrorist or doubting one's professional skills and loud speaking arguments thinking that they'll stick because they sound reasonable enough. But quickly backpedal and reduce the importance of their own championed arguments when they're confronted by analysis.

Anything like this rings a bell by any chance?

Really? I have many times disagreed with NIST's fuel loads and burn times. I doubt they got that part right. Am I labeled a truther? No, of course not.

But, you, like many other truthers, deny just about everything that came from NIST, FEMA, and the 9/11 Comission.

That, Java, is why you are labeled a truther. Oh, and that is what "truth" groups call themselves. We just turned it into an insult.

 

[William Parcher]

I suppose you believe in Bigfoot?

His 8th post on the forum was in a Bigfoot thread about how his brother-in-law saw a Bigfoot and that guy isn't a liar. He believes him and besides that the area is a hotspot for Bigfoot sightings anyway.

 

[D'rok]

but i certainly know the 911 official story is a myth.

I am sincerely glad that you are no longer teaching Alberta children. Help me renew my confidence in the Alberta education system by answering a question for me: were you forced into retirement?