At what point would you consider the British leaders to be fools to keep believing him?
Maybe out of self-interest? Many Brits understood in advance that their empire would not survive a war with Germany.
Please identify three of these Anglo Jews who decided to start WW2. If you cannot identify them, I have to assume you are making this up.
I am merely quoting Joseph Kennedy, the American ambassador and father of JFK, who later got killed by in all likelyhood the Jewish mob around Meyer Lanski for his opposition to Israel acquiring nukes. But that is a different story. He failed to provide names, I am sorry.
Probably among these chaps.
But you will probably say that Kennedy was an
antisemite, which he was, for good reason. Fine, so let us rely on someone else instead.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p135_Weber.html
Very revealing reports home by
Polish Ambassador Potocki to Washington:
On 9 February 1938, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, Count Jerzy Potocki, reported to the Foreign Minister in Warsaw on the Jewish role in making American foreign policy:
The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State Department is becoming ever more powerful ...
... The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general catastrophe. This mood is becoming more and more apparent.
in their definition of democratic states, the Jews have also created real chaos: they have mixed together the idea of democracy and communism and have above all raised the banner of burning hatred against Nazism.
This hatred has become a frenzy. It is propagated everywhere and by every means: in theaters, in the cinema, and in the press. The Germans are portrayed as a nation living under the arrogance of Hitler which wants to conquer the whole world and drown all of humanity in an ocean of blood.
In conversations with Jewish press representatives I have repeatedly come up against the inexorable and convinced view that war is inevitable. This international Jewry exploits every means of propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of consolidation and understanding between nations. In this way, the conviction is growing steadily but surely in public opinion here that the Germans and their satellites, in the form of fascism, are enemies who must be subdued by the 'democratic world.'
Mind you, this is 1938, no Polish crisis in sight.
This completely matches the remark by Chamberlain that he was pushed into war by the Jews.
On 21 November 1938, Ambassador Potocki sent a report to Warsaw which discussed in some detail a conversation between himself and Bullitt, who happened to be back in Washington:
About Germany and Chancellor Hitler he spoke with great vehemence and strong hatred. He said that only force, and ultimately a war would put an end to the insane future German expansionism.
To my question asking how he visualized this coming war, he replied that above all the United States, France and England must rearm tremendously in order to be in a position to oppose German power.
Only then, when the moment is ripe, declared Bullitt further, will one be ready for the final decision. I asked him in what way a conflict could arise, since Germany would probably not attack England and France first. I simply could not see the connecting point in this whole combination.
Bullitt replied that the democratic countries absolutely needed another two years until they were fully armed. In the meantime, Germany would probably have advanced with its expansion in an easterly direction. It would be the wish of the democratic countries that armed conflict would break out there, in the East between the German Reich and Russia. As the Soviet Union's potential strength is not yet known, it might happen that Germany would have moved too far away from its base, and would be condemned to wage a long and weakening war. Only then would the democratic countries attack Germany, Bullitt declared, and force her to capitulate.
So who is this Bullit?
- Bullit Jewish
Like Roosevelt, Bullitt "rose from the rich." He was born into an important Philadelphia banking family, one of the city's wealthiest. His mother's grandfather, Jonathan Horwitz, was a German Jew who had come to the United States from Berlin.
His jewishness becomes clear from his enthusiast support of the criminal Bolshevik regime:
That same year, Wilson and British Prime Minister Lloyd George sent him to Russia to meet with Lenin and determine if the new Bolshevik government deserved recognition by the Allies. Bullitt met with Lenin and other top Soviet leaders and upon his return urged recognition of the new regime.
- Bullit very close to Roosevelt (because they were both Jews):
In the Spring of 1938, all U.S. envoys in Europe were subordinated to Bullitt by an internal directive of the State Department.[14] As the European situation worsened in 1939, Roosevelt often spoke with his man in Paris by telephone, sometimes daily, frequently giving him precisely detailed and ultra-confidential instructions on how to conduct America's foreign policy. Not even Secretary of State Cordell Hull was privy to many of the letters and communications between Bullitt and Roosevelt.
More from Ambassador Potocki's about American war mongering and Jewish influence:
Ambassador Potocki's report from Washington of 9 January 1939 dealt in large part with President Roosevelt's annual address to Congress:
President Roosevelt acts on the assumption that the dictatorial governments, above all Germany and Japan, only understand a policy of force. Therefore he has decided to react to any future blows by matching them. This has been demonstrated by the most recent measures of the United States.
The American public is subject to an ever more alarming propaganda which is under Jewish influence and continuously conjures up the specter of the danger of war. Because of this the Americans have strongly altered their views on foreign policy problems, in comparison with last year.
It is clear that Roosevelt had a war with Germany in the crosshairs long before Pearl Harbor. Was the US threatened by Germany? Of course not. So what was the motivation of this 'American' president? He was a Jew,
surrounded by Jewish advisors.
The Jews had already declared war on Germany as soon as Hitler came to power in 1933. And it was to be the Jew-controlled USA again who would do the dirty work for the Jews, just like in 1917.
How did Mel Gibson say it again?
The Jews are behind all wars. How bluntly impolite a statement! How antisemitic to say so! And how true!
The American Ambassador to Italy, William Phillips, admitted in his postwar memoirs that the Roosevelt administration was already committed to going to war on the side of Britain and France in late 1938.
In this sense it is unfair to blame Britain to start WW2. But Buchanan cannot say otherwise, because if he does he has to mention the Jews. And that would finish Buchanan's career in the American media. But that is the truth, that Britain acted as a proxy for the Jews even before Churchill rose to power. Although there is a world of difference between Chamberlain (who wanted to defend the interests of Britain) and Churchill, who did not give a d*** about Britain and was happy to transfer power from Britain to the USA. Churchill was the greatest traitor to British interest in the entire history of Britain. But that is what you get if you let a foreigner at the helm of your nation.
How would that hasten the demise of the US?
America has already more enemies it can handle. Such a move would unite it's enemies against it earlier than otherwise would happen (the war against Iran will unite everybody against IZ-US-UK).
If it did NOT hasten the demise of the US, then would it be justifiable?
You should not mix morals with politics.
Remember, the only reason the Third Reich wasn't crushed in 1939 was that the French hesitated when they had the opportunity to invade Germany.
The reality 8 months later was that France was crushed within 6 weeks. No reason to assume that in September 1939 that balance was much different.
