Greetings Titanic,
Your question is a good one.
As you should know, but might not know, given the 9/11 denial syndrome, there has not ever been an official determination of what happened on 9/11 arrived at through a valid investigation.
That is to say, what happened on 9/11 was never officially reviewed based on standard investigatory process as to whether or not any flying object, let alone a plane, still less a jetliner and most especially still less a Boeing 767 designated United Flight 175, hit the South Tower. None.
Therefore, the shadow thingy seen in one video version of the event after another remains best described on the basis of the visual characteristics of what is seen, described accurately and precisely.
What is seen is a moving object, sometimes reasonably characterized as the image of a jetliner and sometimes too blurry to be so characterized.
That is what is seen and it is folly to claim otherwise.
This should be obvious, but, for some reason isn't. For example, separate and apart from whether one seeks to place any reliance on, say, the 9/11 Commission Report, that commission was not even formed until 2004, far too long after the event to be a proper investigation. The Commission did not have any evidence, to speak of, to go on that was not already totally tainted by actual destruction, passage of time, undue influence by propaganda; and, most especially, by the commencement of a freakin' war that mandated adherence to the common storyline, standing alone.
There was no way in hades for an actual investigation of 9/11, let alone for questioning of the common storyline, to take place while the USA was bankrupting itself bombing the beejeezus out of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Remember the bombing of Afghanistan started on 10/7/01 while the WTC was still smoldering, to be sure, but no investigation was necessary.
Teevee rules.
And, remember, the impetus for an investigation came from VICTIMS FAMILIES who knew, first hand and full well that there had not been any official determination of what happened to their loved ones up to the formation, amid great fanfare, of that commission.
Despite all the supposed sympathy for victims families, their request for investigation was stonewalled, successfully, for nearly 3 years.
And, even when a commission finally did get underway, it was hamstrung from the outset and did not carryout any real investigation and almost no one, except, perhaps, proponents of propaganda even pretend otherwise.
Think about that in terms of time alone. 9/11/01 was investigation in 2004 pursuant to a haphazard, politically rigged "commission."
The first substitute for the commission is, apparently, the Moussaoui trial exhibits which were not the product of an investigation, but rather, were a grab bag compilation of what the US Attorney could get Zacharias Moussaoui to sign off on. And that wasn't done until 2006, even later than the so-called commission.
Investigations are done as soon after an event as possible, while the evidence is still fresh.
That did not happen in re 9/11. First up in the sham investigatory process was FEMA. They acknowledge that as they were investigating, evidence was being removed, tampered with and otherwise made unavailable to them, irrespective of their limited investigatory mandate. FEMA made no finding as to what happened precisely because they could not do so because the evidence was tampered with.
I don't think I need to reiterate the NIST limitations contained in their report issued in late 2005.
Hello. Is anyone at home?
What passes for proof of 9/11 centers almost exclusively on accepting what was seen on teevee and said by commentators, again, on teevee. From that starting point, all other elements of the common storyline of 9/11 have been drummed into the public consicousness via propaganda, in furtherance of the deadly and gruesomely destructive, shock and awe psyop carried out on 9/11 by persons and entities unknown.
Propaganda remains the key element in the dogged determination of some to further the common storyline of 9/11. Some appear to not care that they are relying on propaganda.
However, it is no longer possible for anyone viewing this thread to pretend that the common storyline of 9/11 is maintained any other way than by the spread and the repetition of propaganda, pure and simple.
Compus continues to try to buttress the claim a Boeing 767, designated Flight 175 hit the South Tower by posting up any human interest story, any memorial eulogy and any photograph of a person said, but not proven, to have been onboard Flight 175, as posted on any DOD or SAIC shadow website, that Compus can scrape up.
Compus is posting up shameless exploitation of victims and of persons who are interested in knowing what happened on 9/11. The exploitation of victims is obvious. I do wish a family member would post up here.
The exploitation of posters and lurkers by Compus is a bit more subtle. The expoitation factor there consists in the necessary subtext of Compus' posting.
That subtext is that anyone who calls attention to the fact there exists no official determination of what happened on 9/11 is not paying proper homage to the victims.
That is shameless exploitation of victims in at least two different ways.
Shame on Compus for posting like that.
Last edited:
Is my English that bad today? Let me rephrase: it doesn't do anyone any good if the same people come back and post their derisive and sneering comments over and over again as a response to someone's extraordinary claims. Now, would you agree?