The Tea Party is Not Racist

MaGZ said:
Today Arkansas, tomorrow the World.
Click to expand...

Bit backwards there. It should be; Today the World, tomorrow Arkansas.
As in: Where are racists looked down upon and considered unelectable?
Today the World, tomorrow Arkansas (as well).
 
His anyone in the Tea Party talked about killing black babies as a member of the New Black Panther Party did a few months ago when he talked about killing white babies?

Obama is a supporter of the NBPP and has hosted its leader Malik Zulu Shabaz in the White House.
 
thaiboxerken said:
How someone can see the letter as NOT being racist is very hard for me to see. Perhaps Williams and the other Tea Party people are just so racist that they can't even understand what they say is racist. I've known people like that, particularly when I've done business in the South.
Click to expand...

Didn’t you know the great Northwest is to become the White American Bastion?
 
thaiboxerken said:
I don't know that the Tea Party was formed as a racist organization. They just seem to attract the racists.
Click to expand...

Correct

Racists need a focal point to rally around theses days, apparently the Tea Party is it.
 
Ausmerican said:
Bit backwards there. It should be; Today the World, tomorrow Arkansas.
As in: Where are racists looked down upon and considered unelectable?
Today the World, tomorrow Arkansas (as well).
Click to expand...

Are you saying that racists are electable in Arkansas?
 
Mumbles said:
The whole "What about the New Black Panthers" defense is pretty weak. I have no idea why people think the NAACP would accept them, when even the real Black Panthers despise them, especially when Kristen Clarke has already denied the Times' story in her testimony to the USCCR.
Click to expand...
Agreed.

Tricky said:
This is just a confirmation of what I already thought was the case; The Tea Party is not a party at all. They have no unity or agenda. They have no real platform. The only thing that unifies them is that they are angry, but they're all angry about different things. Sure, most of it is peripherally about Obama, but not always. They've raled against the GOP too, and even torpedoed the GOPs preferred candidates.

But while they may spoil a few elections and even win a seat or two, they are not going to be players in the US political picture unless they can get their act together, and there is no indication that this is happening. Just the opposite. They're splitting up over stuff like this.
Click to expand...
Also agreed...except I don't know how hard or aggressively they "raled against the GOP".
 
Last edited:
The mention of the new Black Panthers is rather silly, since it consists of 3 people.
 
MaGZ said:
If the guy was on the ballot and not a write-in, I say he would get the majority of White votes in the state.
Click to expand...

MaGZ said:
David Duke won the majority of White votes when he ran for office. Southern Whites will vote for a reasonable White candidate if given the chance.
Click to expand...

Actually, I took your first reply as a slur against the literacy of white voters in Arkansas.
 
MaGZ said:
David Duke won the majority of White votes when he ran for office. Southern Whites will vote for a reasonable White candidate if given the chance.
Click to expand...

Oh MaGZ, I love your silly posts. My favorite part is when you capitalize white but not black.
 
MaGZ said:
David Duke won the majority of White votes when he ran for office. Southern Whites will vote for a reasonable White candidate if given the chance.
Click to expand...

Taking into account the rather glaring contradiction (bolded bits MaGZ), how does statement A correlate to supposition B?
 
The main thing is this:

"We're mad as hell, and we aren't going to take it anymore!"

Its kind of fun to be mad as hell, and somewhat empowering to feel like we aren't going to take 'it' anymore.

Why get bogged down in the details?

Its a party!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom