We Will Not Be Silenced 2008

[DC]

BeAChooser, shouldn't you be happy? Would you prefer to see Hillary as President? wasn't you one of those that "exposed" all those nasty conspiracies she and Bill were involved in?

 

[Dancing David]

This really deserves a thread. One more Obama scandal brewing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ccbd4DbpS4c&feature=player_embedded



Now this documentary is by Gigi Gaston, a life long democrat from a family of democrats whose grandfather was in fact a democratic governor of Massachusetts. So this isn't a right wing conspiracy. This is by a democrat. And she discovered multiple examples of voter intimidation and voting violations by the Obama campaign. You can watch some clips from the video in the above youtube video. There seems to be a pattern here, folks. There is even an example of a black women, a civil rights activist, seeing black women come up to a voting both and being told that if she's not voting for Obama she's not going to vote. But will the Obama DOJ investigate any of this? I think you already know the answer. That's it's more corrupt than even the Clinton DOJ.

By the way, here's the documentary website where you can watch more examples:

http://www.wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/

As the website states:



Comments?

So reported allegations and opinions, any actual data?

ETA:
Looks very um, spartan and empty.
http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/document.htm

Looks very sparse on names, dates and data, first document does not even list witnesses.

 

[Dancing David]

Sounds like a big ole' bag of sour grapes.

Or sour whine!

 

[leftysergeant]

I heard about these actions at the time; there was some mention of it on conservative political blogs as well as on the Democratic "Puma" blogs.

The whole mess smells like PUMA droppings.

They were an Astroturf group dreamed up by the fat deaf gas bag.

Nothing there, folks.

 

[BeAChooser]

What are you talking about? Where did democrats make allegations against a republican or conservative in this story?

Wow. So now your tactics descend to pretend obtuseness.

Originally Posted by BeAChooser
And how do you know they have no evidence?

I don't. I do know that they didn't provide any.

None at all? Of course, that's not true, is it. In fact, is this stituation any different then when Obama supporting black congressmen/women claimed they were called the N word and spit on during their walk through protestors just before the Health Care vote? Not one camera (and there were hundreds there) recorded the incident. Nor did any member of the crowd or the police come forward to corroborate the claim. It was totally … what was that word you used … "anecdotal" … based solely on the *word* of a few congresscritters (who themselves weren't totally in agreement). And yet I seem to recall a lot of folks from your side of this discussion jumping on board to accuse the protestors of racism and demanding *justice*. And did you utter one word about that? Your outrage seems a little selective, Upchurch.

Given your past, it doesn't take a psychic to predict that you would present CT nonsense.

LOL! So this is simply "CT nonsense" … in Upchurch's totally unbiased … … *opinion*. But, mind you, all of these charges are coming from democrats. In fact, Gina Gaston said she started investigating to debunk the claims of Obama fraud. And couldn't. Isn't it amazing, folks, that something like this could come out and the mainstream media doesn't even mention it? Think about that the next time someone tries to tell you that the MSM doesn't have an Obama bias.

 

[BeAChooser]

Yep, the BAC we've come to know and love

Now, SezMe, even you have to admit that this thread concerns Clinton.

 

[Upchurch]

Wow. So now your tactics descend to pretend obtuseness.

Technically, yes. I was following your often voiced request to not go off topic. Democrats did not make allegations against Republicans in this case so it is not pertinent.

...unless you want to open that door in your other threads as well?

None at all? Of course, that's not true, is it. In fact, is this stituation any different then when Obama supporting black congressmen/women claimed they were called the N word and spit on during their walk through protestors just before the Health Care vote?

I don't recall ever hearing about it. Based on what little I know of it (which constitutes what you just said above), I would not call that evidence either.

And yet I seem to recall a lot of folks from your side of this discussion jumping on board to accuse the protestors of racism and demanding *justice*. And did you utter one word about that?

"your side"

I'm not sure why I'm being held accountable for something I had no part of and hadn't heard of until a moment ago.


On anecdotal evidence:
Hundreds of people have seen aliens or alien UFO. They are very insistant that it is true and come off as if they truly believe it. Should we take them at their word and consider this evidence of alien visitations to Earth?

No. It would be idiotic to do so without some kind of reasonable physical evidence to support it.

Now, granted, people behaving badly is not as big of a claim as little green men, so the evidence needed would be considerably smaller. Smaller, but non-zero.

Is there any supporting evidence for these claims?

 

[Vorticity]

Don't be silly. We all know that BeAChooser is just an avid Hillary supporter!

I heard they're lovers.

 

[DC]

heard that too, BAC was payback for Monica.

 

[Dancing David]

I think that antibiotics will help....

 

[JoeTheJuggler]

So this is simply "CT nonsense"

Yes.

 

[Darth Rotor]

Clinton democrats should demand Holder investigate. How about that? Or are only a few now willing to admit they were Clinton democrats?

That doesn't answer my question, which surprises me not, Johnny One Note.

 

[Upchurch]

Looks very um, spartan and empty.
http://wewillnotbesilenced2008.com/document.htm

Looks very sparse on names, dates and data, first document does not even list witnesses.

Yeah, I finally took the time to look through those documents. The strongest argument they have is that the caucus system sucks, but no actual evidence that supports the claim that Obama intimidated or otherwise cheated. In fact, those last two documents (challenges and disqualifications) appear to favor Clinton, not Obama.

I think it is fairly obvious why this "story" has been dead for two years. My question now, is what brought this zombie back to life after so long?

 

[thaiboxerken]

It's close to November. Necromancy politics will be big this year because the Conservatives are having a hard time finding legitimate criticisms of Obama. I say this even though I know there are plenty of legitimate concerns I have about Obama and the democrats.

 

[INRM]

Thaiboxerken,

I agree by in large, there are all sorts of legitimate reasons to criticize Obama.

 

[KingMerv00]

Did you notice how many of ther are from Texas? There's a bit of benzine in the air down that way.

(Which may explain a thing or two.)

How self aware are you? You do realize you are just BAC's antimatter clone don't you?

 

[Shalamar]

How self aware are you? You do realize you are just BAC's antimatter clone don't you?

Hmm.. nah. Not enough smilies.

 

[gnome]

Regarding the OP title--who was silenced?

 

[Cleon]

Regarding the OP title--who was silenced?

Didn't you hear? It's illegal to be a Clinton supporter now. That's why Hillary was purged from the Democratic Party and now lives in exile in France.

Or, you know, she was given the most senior post in the Cabinet and is fourth in line for the Presidency. Which I suppose is kinda the same thing.

 

[Upchurch]

Regarding the OP title--who was silenced?

Hillary supporters were silenced in the exact same way that Tea Party members aren't represented in government: their candidate lost. (never mind that had their say and were just in the minority).