Calling all Boxcutter Conspiracy Theorists

roscoe_the_first said:
So the scene was an FBI crime scene was it?

So why is FBI evidence being moved by military personnel?
Click to expand...

Man, That is one odd military uniform...

300pxpentagondebris7362.jpg


Brown shoes, white pants, light blue shirt. He must have been one really drunk sailor when he got dressed that morning. He is definitely out of uniform...:jaw-dropp

Brown shoes = Naval Aviator (officer) white pants = all officers and enlisted and light blue shirt = enlisted (E-6 and below).
 
roscoe_the_first said:
So we don't know if the cabin was ever breached. Actually if you read Pilots for 911 truth you'll find that the black box data has very likely been tampered with.

But as the first post on this thread clearly says. The black box data does not agree with eyewitness accounts.
Click to expand...

We know for certain that the cockpit was breached. If it hadn't, it wouldn't have been parked into the side of a MFing building.

So, because it harms you and your little bunch of moronic friends' bull**** theory, it's tampered with.

If the FDR data says one thing, and some quotemined eyewitnesses say another, I will take the FDR data. Eyewitness testimony is ALWAYS trumped by physical evidence.
 
Sam.I.Am said:
Man, That is one odd military uniform...

[qimg]http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/152/300pxpentagondebris7362.jpg[/qimg]

Brown shoes, white pants, light blue shirt. He must have been one really drunk sailor when he got dressed that morning. He is definitely out of uniform...:jaw-dropp

Brown shoes = Naval Aviator (officer) white pants = all officers and enlisted and light blue shirt = enlisted (E-6 and below).
Click to expand...

Hmm! So he's FBI then?
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Are you calling me a liar?
Click to expand...

Yes.

Isn't that a forum violation? That's one to take over to the other forums.
Click to expand...

Only if it is not true. You have lied numerous times in this thread already.

So what part of "Rumsfeld says $2.3 trillion missing from the Pentagon" don't you understand?
Click to expand...

What part of "it helps to watch the video you link to" do you not understand? Rumsfield says "we cannot track 2.3 trillion dollars" he does not say missing at all. Its about poor spending and accounting practices. It was also mentioned prior to this date.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Doesn't matter old chum. Evidence was being moved removed and when they covered up the lawn as well one is forced to play please put the following into a well known phrase:

UP COVER

literally.
Click to expand...

Again, why are you asking for evidence if you are just going to say that the government covered it up? What about this photo:

Pentagon_Debris_17.jpg


Is this entire team featured in the picture and the guy moving the plane debris knowingly letting themselves be photographed planting evidence? Or more rationally, do you think that the FBI agent is removing the plane wreckage for further analysis?
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Doesn't matter old chum. Evidence was being moved removed and when they covered up the lawn as well one is forced to play please put the following into a well known phrase:

UP COVER

literally.

With the crime scene is walked all over by all kinds of people from who knows where any subsequent investigation is null and void.
Click to expand...

BUUZZZZZZ!!! WRONG!! Everyone on that went in and out of that area had to either have some kind of badge, be WITH someone that had a badge, or have DIRECT PERMISSION to be in there. Firefighters and police officers do not typically allow unauthorized people in a fire scene, unless they have been TOLD to do something.

ESPECIALLY when we are talking about the Pentagon.
 
Sam.I.Am said:
I have no idea, but he sure can't be called military going by what he's wearing.

see what i did there? i didn't make up stuff out of whole cloth to support my beliefs. you ought to try it out some time
Click to expand...

so every man and his dog was wandering all over the crime scene then.
 
Or how about his pic roscoe:
300px-Pentagondebris6.jpg


It was taken by AP/Wide World Photos, not a government photo. Were they in on it? They photographed a piece of wreckage that had not been touched by anyone.
 
triforcharity said:
BUUZZZZZZ!!! WRONG!! Everyone on that went in and out of that area had to either have some kind of badge, be WITH someone that had a badge, or have DIRECT PERMISSION to be in there. Firefighters and police officers do not typically allow unauthorized people in a fire scene, unless they have been TOLD to do something.

ESPECIALLY when we are talking about the Pentagon.
Click to expand...

Not FBI or NTSB then. everyone (with a badge)is free to tamper with the crime scene. Yes?
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Not the issue old boy. the issue is that the Black box info is flawed.
Click to expand...

So, if it's flawed, why are YOU touting it as some kind of evidence? If it's flawed, than it is dismissed completly.

Go back to school son. And stop with the "Old Chum" "Old Boy" bullcrap. It's getting old. Either address posters by their name, or do not address them.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Not the issue old boy. the issue is that the Black box info is flawed.
Click to expand...

Reported.

No it is not flawed. PFT analysis of the data is flawed. they even missed the last few seconds of data that they had all the time. Warren Stutt decoded it. It proved CIT and captain bobby were wrong about the height of the plane.
 
roscoe_the_first said:
Not FBI or NTSB then. everyone (with a badge)is free to tamper with the crime scene. Yes?
Click to expand...

No. Stop being obtuse.

The NTSB was not there in the first 30 minutes. The FBI could, as they have offices very close to there. ETA: 4.8 miles exactly. They have badges. Badges that say they are allowed to enter to a certain restricted place.
 
Last edited:
roscoe_the_first said:
so every man and his dog was wandering all over the crime scene then.
Click to expand...

Again, not what I said. He might be FBI or some other investigative agency, he might be a Pentagon employee. The point is that I don't know and neither do you. The difference is that you make claims of who he is (military) while I point out who he isn't based upon what I can clearly see. In other words I don't make crap up while you do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom