The above is simply not worthy of your potential level of analysis. You are not interpreting the data properly.
By 0923, teevee had already included the apparent "live" image and apparent teevee narration of the famous "
"...there's another one..." declaration. Plus, by 0923, the whole thing had been solved and Osama binLaden had already been fingered as the culprit, I do believe.
Further, just think about DeVona's statement. It is impossible for confirmation to have consisted in anything other than what people were getting from teevee.
The problem is, teevee doesn't trump what people actually experienced and said.
I suppose the issue is, has been, and might for a long time continue to be, whether and to what extent people are willing to examine the role of teevee in the 9/11 PSYOP.
We saw this a little bit in the blacking out of the Dick Oliver video and in the selective us of witnesses. The one window on reality we had was taken from us. Right after OLPT, we were given filtered and selective witnesses, Sean, Rosa and Jim. Yet, all actual witnesses, including all in the Dick Oliver video were saying "explosion" and not plane.
The fact that Dick Oliver was blanked out and substituted with both the fuzzy image and witnesses who were saying things completely at odds with what those who were, more or less, right in front of the building were saying speaks volumes that what we were being exposed to was a PSYOP.
I have already said a survery of the 4 volumes of the PAPD statements, and you can look yourself, confirm that an overwhelming number of statements use the word "EXPLOSION" just like the actual responses from witnesses in the Dick Oliver video, and almost none claiming a plane and those that do claim a plane are either tentative or at a distance, for the most part.
Once again, here's a reminder of exactly when the window on reality was taken away:
http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/AlbumOliver/blankoliver1.jpg?t=1273186704
I have already mentioned that there are witnesses like that. Reality is almost always a hodge-podge and is almost never completely one way or another. I was the one who called attention to this grouping of "smell" witnesses. Furthermore, the claim is that the K-9s smelled jet fuel. Now, goodness knows I respect K-9s and I am sure the K-9s smelled something, but really, ask yourself this:
How does a police officer know a dog is smelling jet fuel?
Does the dog bark a certain number of times if it's jet fuel and a different number if it's some other substance?
All we can know from our K-9 partners is that something they have been trained to respond to is present. As to what it is, people have to find it. There was no evidence that people could point to for purposes of claiming jet fuel.
Come on, put your thinking cap on please
Keep in mind, too, that of all the human senses, our sense of smell is our weakest and least reliable.
As jet fuel is functionally equivalent to and interchangable with kerosene and heating oil, all oil heated buildings do, in fact, contain the functional equivalent of jet fuel.
So, indeed, I can field that one.