Was Dick Oliver confused about what he heard on 9/11

jammonius said:
Go play 20 questions with yourself.....chirp.....chirp.....chirp....
Click to expand...

You made an assertion that there should be a crater....what on earth is wrong with asking you to show us why there should be one??

It was, of course, a rhetorical question as I know you do not have either the intellect, education or even sanity to be able to work out why you are wrong......but a least be man enough to admit that instead of your incessant hand waving.
hand-waving-goodbye.jpg
 
Last edited:
Here, for instance, is a reminder of a visual of substance. Someone who's statement is one of several who confirm NO PLANE, by which is meant, no Boeing 767 @ 500mph hit the North Tower.


OLPT.jpg



The fact that she was not presented on network teevee speaks volumes, lurkers.
 
jammonius said:
Hey posters and lurkers,

I'd like to also double check for accuracy of understanding as to the following transcription found in post # 390:

0:41-0:42 Female voice: [ETA:] "Was that the, uh, Concorde?"

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5898171&postcount=390

Do posters and lurkers acknowledge that the Female voice is more likely to have said the word Concourse referring to the area in the middle of the WTC complex that is also called the "WTC Plaza" than the word Concorde?

Mind you, I am here asking a specific question. Which interpretation is "more likely"

There is no right or wrong answer, I'm just asking what do posters hear and what do they consider more likely?

Also, if posters are 100% sure in their interpretations, one way or another, they can feel free to just come right out and scream it.
Click to expand...

She says "was that the Concorde?"

This audio is better: http://911digitalarchive.org/sonicmedia//repository/media/child_864.mp3

Why doesn't mine have a time counter on it? Help?
 
sheeplesnshills said:
You made an assertion that there should be a crater....what on earth is wrong with asking you to show us why there should be one??

It was, of course, a rhetorical question as I know you do not have either the intellect, education or even sanity to be able to work out why you are wrong......but a least be man enough to admit that instead of your incessant hand waving.
[qimg]http://escapethedrain.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/hand-waving-goodbye.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Hey, sheeplesnshills,

Take a chill pill, please. For some reason, posters appear to have gone nuts.

Hey, posters, look: If you are sick and damn tired of posting here, then, by all means, STOP POSTING.

Look, I'm a reasonable person. I will stop posting for 24 hours if that will make all of you feel better.

You apparently have had enough. OK.

See ya later.

The time is 10:20pt
 
I love how you show a screenshot of her on network tv while saying she wasn't on network tv.

And you are blatantly lying now, she does not confirm no plane, she confirms that she was not in a position to see it.
 
jammonius said:
Here, for instance, is a reminder of a visual of substance. Someone who's statement is one of several who confirm NO PLANE, by which is meant, no Boeing 767 @ 500mph hit the North Tower.


[qimg]http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/AlbumOliver/OLPT.jpg?t=1272981553[/qimg]


The fact that she was not presented on network teevee speaks volumes, lurkers.
Click to expand...

flogging-a-dead-horse-300.jpg
 
jammonius said:
Hey, sheeplesnshills,

Take a chill pill, please. For some reason, posters appear to have gone nuts.

Hey, posters, look: If you are sick and damn tired of posting here, then, by all means, STOP POSTING.

Look, I'm a reasonable person. I will stop posting for 24 hours if that will make all of you feel better.

You apparently have had enough. OK.

See ya later.

The time is 10:20pt
Click to expand...
Will you answer my question when you return? Here is it again (It's along the same line as sheeplesnshills's)


And you know this how? If it landed flat it would do less damage then if it landed on its side and the hardness of the surface it landed on would make a difference (for example).

Now, please tell us what you base your opinion on?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
twinstead said:
yea, all you lurkers who believe jammonius post. Please.

Like i did with the realistice thread, i find this thread a fascinating study in how one can argue such a totally untenable point for so many pages. It appears the only thing jammonius has convinced anybody here of is that he just may need professional help.

It is indeed getting old.
Click to expand...

stupidposter.jpg
 
jammonius said:
Hey, sheeplesnshills,

Take a chill pill, please. For some reason, posters appear to have gone nuts.

Hey, posters, look: If you are sick and damn tired of posting here, then, by all means, STOP POSTING.

Look, I'm a reasonable person. I will stop posting for 24 hours if that will make all of you feel better.

You apparently have had enough. OK.

See ya later.

The time is 10:20pt
Click to expand...


get_well_soon_graphics_17.gif
 
Last edited:
BigAl said:
I'm 100% sure that two hijacked jets caused all the death and destruction at WTC on 9/11.

None of your babble has made the slightest dent in any of the massive amount of information that informs my understanding of what happened on 9/11.

Your assertions are either factually wrong, irrelevant or and incoherent.
Click to expand...
.
Fixt it.
 
sheeplesnshills said:
Please show us why that would be so. List all assumptions made and show working.....
Click to expand...


jammonius said:
Go play 20 questions with yourself
Click to expand...



You were asked to provide justification for one of your assumptions.
Your response is effectively saying "no".

Why is it that you get to make assumptions left right and center, while never having to provide justification for them, and yet you constantly jump on other people for making assumptions, even when those assumptions are readily apparent to any rational person?
 
sheeplesnshills said:
Definitely she says, The Concorde and the noise just before the impact is as much like a plane as anything else. Funny thing that....on every recording of the impact there is a noise which can reasonably be construed as being a plane........:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

When Jammy gets back maybe he could explain how one can hear the "Subway" from inside a conference room at 1 Liberty Plaza???
 
jammonius said:
Here, for instance, is a reminder of a visual of substance. Someone who's statement is one of several who confirm NO PLANE, by which is meant, no Boeing 767 @ 500mph hit the North Tower.


[qimg]http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af205/jfibonacci/AlbumOliver/OLPT.jpg?t=1272981553[/qimg]


The fact that she was not presented on network teevee speaks volumes, lurkers.
Click to expand...

Sorry, where was she relative to Flight 11 when it crashed?
 
jammonius said:
Go play 20 questions with yourself.....chirp.....chirp.....chirp....
Click to expand...

Posters / Lurkers:

As others have pointed out, this is typical logjam thinking. Jammonius gets to make all the ascertations s/he wishes but heaven forbid, don't ask for him/her to support them. As we all know, that's a playing 20 questions, which leads to playing Gotcha, does nothing to advance the discussion and gosh darn it, it's just downright rude. You all should know better. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom