Amanda Knox guilty - all because of a cartwheel

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wouldn,t it be far simpler and more logical to have broken the window from the inside? And not risk being seen?
 
Bruce Fisher said:
I know plenty about the Kercher lawyer. I know that he was sitting with his buddy Mignini when Mignini was convicted. I have no reason to discuss him further. He has no bearing on this case. I was informing Dan that he was directing his anger at the wrong people.
Click to expand...

What? Are you suggesting that Maresca is in league with Mignini and is not actually under the employ of the Kercher family? What does his "sitting with his buddy" have to do with your allegations regarding the financial and compensatory aspects of the criminal case against AK, RS and RG?

This is all innuendo, so far, and it would be best if you stated (with evidence) exactly what you mean.
 
Moss said:
Bruce, for the sake of being able to compare, would you mind putting up what measurements you've got?
Click to expand...

I am working up a presentation. I never got around to doing this because it is simply an online argument. It will have no bearing on the appeal. The prosecution agreed the climb was possible.
 
Wouldn,t it be far simpler and more logical to have broken the window from the inside? Less noisy, and no risk of being seen?
 
You keep saying what has been said and shown in court. You say it very confidently and authoritatively. Do you have full transcripts?

Also you say you studied this wall: this means you have been there. Did you make the climb yourself?

I have to say that aside from all the other arguments I find it odd if a burglar did not sweep the sill clear of glass before going in the way you describe. It would be the natural thing to do. Much easier than reaching the latch; no reason not to do it. Avoids the chance of being injured. Why do you think that was not done?
 
Fulcanelli said:
Not on the JREF she hasn't, but she has elsewhere (long enough to know better)...and she is rather active on Bruce's site...she's one of those kinds of people Bruce and his site attracts.
Hi, just popping in for a sec (I know how you like me to keep you apprised of my current status, Fulcanelli). Just to clarify, I have never posted on Bruce's site, although I do admire it. You are more likely to find me on the West Seattle Herald and the examiner.

"Long enough to know better" about what?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
But, Bruce, It has already been ascertained that the break in was staged. And, there was no dna of Rudi in Filomena's room.
 
Bruce Fisher said:
I am working up a presentation. I never got around to doing this because it is simply an online argument. It will have no bearing on the appeal. The prosecution agreed the climb was possible.
Click to expand...

Whether it was discussed in the original trial is not something that should keep us from discussing it. The question is not where the argument takes place but rather does it have a bearing on the truth?
If it can be easily put to rest, then we should do it and move on.
 
Moss said:
Whether it was discussed in the original trial is not something that should keep us from discussing it. The question is not where the argument takes place but rather does it have a bearing on the truth?
If it can be easily put to rest, then we should do it and move on.
Click to expand...

I will finish the presentation and post it on my site. I will link it here.
 
Moss said:
Whether it was discussed in the original trial is not something that should keep us from discussing it. The question is not where the argument takes place but rather does it have a bearing on the truth?
If it can be easily put to rest, then we should do it and move on.
Click to expand...

My reading of the portion of the translated judges report dealing with this indicates a whole lot of doubt that Rudy entered through that window. I keep hearing that this and that is not part of the appeal. What exactly is part of the appeal?
 
Fiona said:
You keep saying what has been said and shown in court. You say it very confidently and authoritatively. Do you have full transcripts?

Also you say you studied this wall: this means you have been there. Did you make the climb yourself?

I have to say that aside from all the other arguments I find it odd if a burglar did not sweep the sill clear of glass before going in the way you describe. It would be the natural thing to do. Much easier than reaching the latch; no reason not to do it. Avoids the chance of being injured. Why do you think that was not done?
Click to expand...

You can look at measurements and look at photographs and reach a conclusion.

If you are asking me if I have access to full court transcripts, the answer is yes. So do you, In Italy.

Have I personally read them all? No. I do rely on a source to give me that information. I do not speak or read Italian.

I have no idea why Rudy didn't clear the ledge. I have no idea why Rudy did a lot of things. If Rudy was a logical person, he wouldn't have broken into multiple places and he certainly wouldn't have murdered a young woman.

The glass is flat and it was laying flat on a portion of the ledge. A slight majority of that ledge was not covered in glass. It was not like he was pulling his body over large amounts of jagged glass sticking out at him.
 
Last edited:
capealadin said:
Amanda had contact with Meredith's blood. It was in the bathroom.
Click to expand...

Your statement is incorrect. Meredith's blood landed on a surface that had the residual DNA from Amanda already on it. Amanda used this bathroom. Her residual DNA was normal and expected.
 
RoseMontague said:
My reading of the portion of the translated judges report dealing with this indicates a whole lot of doubt that Rudy entered through that window. I keep hearing that this and that is not part of the appeal. What exactly is part of the appeal?
Click to expand...

They believe that he didn't enter through the window because they determined that the room was staged. I disagree with that. The photos certainly do not show a staged room.
 
Bruce Fisher said:
You can look at measurements and look at photographs and reach a conclusion.
Click to expand...

Does this mean you have not been there?

If you are asking me if I have access to full court transcripts, the answer is yes.

Have I personally read them all? No. I do rely on a source to give me that information. I do not speak or read Italian.
Click to expand...

Presumbly this is one of those sources you cannot disclose. It is a pity: but you can surely post the italian transcripts in support of your claims if you have access to them. There are many Italian speakers at PMF and maybe there are some here. In this way you can back up your statements and this will go a long way to enhancing your credibility. At present you are being put in the position of making assertions which you cannot support and it is not making you look good. I do not know who has put you in that position nor why you have allowed it: but I think it would be sensible to change that situation. Up to you of course
 
Bruce Fisher said:
They believe that he didn't enter through the window because they determined that the room was staged. I disagree with that. The photos certainly do not show a staged room.
Click to expand...

The appeal will highlight the complete incompetence of the investigators. The DNA will be challenged.

There is a new witness, and there is more to come about Rudy. I do not know the details of this new information. We will have to wait for the appeal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom