Amanda Knox guilty - all because of a cartwheel

Status
Not open for further replies.
You are making up stories, Bruce Fisher. Or perhaps you are repeating stories made-up by someone else. If you cannot see how damning that is on the basis of the part of your previous post which I bolded I cannot think of a different way to express it which will help you. But I thnk others will see the point I am making about this approach (which you share with Dan_O) and maybe they can find a better way of conveying the very real problem it typifies

I don't think Bruce will seriously consider this problem. It's clear from his website that he's invested a lot of time and effort in Amanda's innocence. To turn his back on that is a hard thing to do.
 
No mention of pulling him in in the middle of the night, then. Nobody is denying Mignini interviewed him. Nobody is denying that he was suspected of interfering with a murder investigation: in fact Preston himself concedes that he and Spezi were doing just that. What do you think would happen in those circumcstances anywhere in the world ?

So how does the time of the interrogation change anything at all? How is the outcome different? Like I said 50 times already, Once I confirm the time, I will edit it.
 
I don't think Bruce will seriously consider this problem. It's clear from his website that he's invested a lot of time and effort in Amanda's innocence. To turn his back on that is a hard thing to do.

The points that are being made are extremely weak! they have no bearing at all on anything.

Are you people really this delusional?
 
You are making up stories, Bruce Fisher. Or perhaps you are repeating stories made-up by someone else. If you cannot see how damning that is on the basis of the part of your previous post which I bolded I cannot think of a different way to express it which will help you. But I thnk others will see the point I am making about this approach (which you share with Dan_O) and maybe they can find a better way of conveying the very real problem it typifies

Saying something is reasonable to believe is not making up a story. You are trying really hard to make something out of nothing.

The points being made are extremely weak!

Hey Bruce, I saw that you forgot to cross that T, that must mean that Mignini didn't threaten Preston.

I got you Bruce, your site is full of lies! You forgot to cross that T!
 
Saying something is reasonable to believe is not making up a story. You are trying really hard to make something out of nothing.

The points being made are extremely weak!

Hey Bruce, I saw that you forgot to cross that T, that must mean that Mignini didn't threaten Preston.

I got you Bruce, your site is full of lies! You forgot to cross that T!

Do you want your site to be factual or not?
 
I am going to bed. I went ahead and removed the one sentence that you were all crying about. You know what, nothing changed, the content still has the exact same meaning. I know it bothered you so much. Well actually I know you didn't really care about it at all, you are simply trying as hard as you possibly can to discredit me. You are doing a pathetic job.

I will get the confirmation and if it needs to be edited again, I will do it.
 
What bothers me is that you claim you want a factual site. You are shown areas in which your site is less than facutal, and yet you insist on not updating those areas.

You keep making this claim and it is an outright lie. I have proven you wrong but you still continue to lie. You claim that Chris is a liar. Look at you.
 
Bruce Fisher do you know anything about the MoF case at all? I ask because you keep making assertions about Mignini which are at odds with everything I have been able to discover about it. What evidence do you have that he "threatened" Mr Preston? What evidence do you have that he "made a fool of himself"? These are strong words and they are not supported by my own brief foray into that case.
 
You keep making this claim and it is an outright lie. I have proven you wrong but you still continue to lie. You claim that Chris is a liar. Look at you.

In case you missed my comment above,

I went ahead and removed the one sentence that you were all crying about. You know what, nothing changed, the content still has the exact same meaning. I know it bothered you so much. Well actually I know you didn't really care about it at all, you are simply trying as hard as you possibly can to discredit me. You are doing a pathetic job.

Stop the lies. Stop trying so hard to discredit me. You will look pathetic and fail.
 
Bruce Fisher do you know anything about the MoF case at all? I ask because you keep making assertions about Mignini which are at odds with everything I have been able to discover about it. What evidence do you have that he "threatened" Mr Preston? What evidence do you have that he "made a fool of himself"? These are strong words and they are not supported by my own brief foray into that case.

I have Mr. Preston's word. That's all I need. I trust him. The recent court ruling in regard to the case proves that Mignini made a fool of himself.
 
The assertions you have made here about Mignini are not accuate: not just the one about "the middle of the night": the whole narrative is not supported by the facts. You can continue to deny that this more than just a detail: but it is not just a detail and your bluster does not change that in any way
 
In case you missed my comment above,

I went ahead and removed the one sentence that you were all crying about. You know what, nothing changed, the content still has the exact same meaning. I know it bothered you so much. Well actually I know you didn't really care about it at all, you are simply trying as hard as you possibly can to discredit me. You are doing a pathetic job.

Stop the lies. Stop trying so hard to discredit me. You will look pathetic and fail.
I saw that. Should I pull up all the posts where you refused to change your website before finally agreeing to do so?

That you have changed your website does not, in any way, diminish my point that you have insisted on not doing so even after having errors pointed out to you.


I do thank you for the edit. Let's move on to the next one, shall we?
 
I have Mr. Preston's word. That's all I need. I trust him. The recent court ruling in regard to the case proves that Mignini made a fool of himself.

Have you even read what the court case was about? Including, but not limited to, why Mignini was found guilty?
 
I saw that. Should I pull up all the posts where you refused to change your website before finally agreeing to do so?

That you have changed your website does not, in any way, diminish my point that you have insisted on not doing so even after having errors pointed out to you.


I do thank you for the edit. Let's move on to the next one, shall we?

I do not take your word for it. I confirm it with credible sources. You want edits done immediately. Just like a child that wants a sucker.

I have asked Kermit if he made his edits but he disappeared. He has incorrect information online but his is much more important. His actually pertains to evidence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom