Amanda Knox guilty - all because of a cartwheel

[BobTheDonkey]

Once again, it is not the information. I will provide anything that I have. I have no problem getting the truth out to anyone who will listen. I simply cannot talk about my sources. Like I said, if that is not acceptable then I cannot participate.

Then perhaps you're ready to answer my questions regarding the broken window?

1) Why was Raffaele's DNA able to be spread through 3rd party movement and contaminate the bra clasp in a room he was "never in", likewise, Meredith's DNA was carried by a3 rd party to the knife, and yet there was no evidence of Rudy ever being in Filomena's room?

2) How was the window unlatched through the hole in the glass?

3) Why is there no glass in the garden if the rock was thrown from outside, requiring the shutter to be open?

4) How was the wall scaled and the window climbed through without knocking any glass to the ground nor any evidence of a climb on the wall itself? Additionally, how was the wall even scaled in the first place?

 

[Fulcanelli]

Latest news, translated by Jools:

Prosecution Office request trial for Sollecito’s Family.
The first day for the pre-trial hearing on the scientific police film aired by Telenorba against the family of Raffaele Sollecito has been postponed to June 16 due to the absence of one of the lawyers. Those investigated are facing various charges for the public transmission of the film, defamation, invasion of privacy and arbitrary publication of the acts of investigation and publication of gruesome acts.
Sollecito's family pre-trial postponed

http://www.perugiamurderfile.org/viewtopic.php?p=42855#p42855

 

[tsig]

I've stated what my position is. Is it so hard to accept that someone can be skeptical, especially given the volume of information that isn't available to the public yet. I guess that could be another defining characteristic that separates the guilters from skeptics.

So your position is that Amanda is innocent but you don't know who is guilty?

 

[tsig]

If you already know everything then why do you ask? I think it is quite clear that you do not know everything. You think Barbie is a good source. That tells me everything that I need to know about your sources.

I have secret evidence that I cannot reveal that Barbie is an excellent source.

That tells me everything that I need to know about your sources.

 

[tsig]

I had these images extracted from the software. It is a waste of time because these shoe prints were not disputed in court. Both the prosecution and the defense agreed that these shoe prints belong to Rudy Guede.

I am a credible person. I know that you will never accept that fact no matter how many times I prove you to be incorrect.

Here are the images.

http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/footprints-05.html

According to sources that you cannot reveal.

 

[tsig]

You claim to be the expert. Yet after over two years you only have the information that is readily available on the internet. You believe Barbie is an excellent source and you are still trying to figure out the time line for pizza day.

Maybe you should take a step back and realize that you aren't that important. I know that I certainly am not. I will provide all of the information that I have but I am simply not in the position to talk about my sources.

I am well aware of the real world. In the real world, two innocent people have been wrongly convicted. This is not a game. Public opinion is important and things are changing whether you want to admit that or not. The media will be much more favorable for Amanda Knox during the appeal. Not only in the US but worldwide.

It's a real shame then that judges will be trying the case and not the media.

 

[tsig]

Are their lawyers not good enough then? And how does your 'fighting' help them? Do you really believe you can influence the Italian Justice system? I would guess not since you have stated that you don't want to interfere with the trial, so then, what do you hope to achieve and how?

Apparently just revealing his sources could compromise the appeal.

 

[RoseMontague]

If you do this, you have to put something under the window to catch the broken glass and then place all the broken glass by hand to make it look like the rock was thrown from outside the window.

How long do you think it would take to do this?

I had these images extracted from the software. It is a waste of time because these shoe prints were not disputed in court. Both the prosecution and the defense agreed that these shoe prints belong to Rudy Guede.

I am a credible person. I know that you will never accept that fact no matter how many times I prove you to be incorrect.

Here are the images.

http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/footprints-05.html

Thanks Bruce. I appreciate the photo's of Filomena's room as well. I may have interpreted those differently than you did but these prints appear to be Rudy's.

 

[shuttlt]

Fulcanelli,

Any thoughts on how "arbitrary publication of the acts of investigation" might apply to all these Gigs of crime scene photos and videos? This kind of concern had been at the back of my mind when the whole issue of hosting Charlie's collection came up.

 

[Bruce Fischer]

Are their lawyers not good enough then? And how does your 'fighting' help them? Do you really believe you can influence the Italian Justice system? I would guess not since you have stated that you don't want to interfere with the trial, so then, what do you hope to achieve and how?

How does your fighting help anyone? Why do you spend the majority of your life fighting online to destroy Amanda Knox? Why are you obsessed?

 

[Agatha]

Is an ambush defence permitted in the Italian justice system?

 

[Bruce Fischer]

It's a real shame then that judges will be trying the case and not the media.

Where you you for the first trial? Did you miss the trial by media?

 

[Bruce Fischer]

According to sources that you cannot reveal.

Kermit asked me for images that he was so sure I could not provide. He repeatedly left sarcastic comments in regard to these images.

The images have no bearing at all on the case. I posted them simply to show that Kermit is not the genius that he thinks he is.

 

[Bruce Fischer]

So your position is that Amanda is innocent but you don't know who is guilty?

This comment really has no purpose. You do not prove your innocence by finding the guilty person. That's not how it works.

I do have an opinion on this or course.

Just so everyone knows, Rudy Guede murdered Meredith Kercher. He acted alone.

 

[Bruce Fischer]

You don't sympathise with her then and your cause isn't sympathetic to her then?

You know why you use that word. It's like Barbie defending the title of her book. It's pointless.

 

[Bruce Fischer]

Sources

One point does need to be clarified. I do list 99% of my sources. My site is filled with references. This entire conversation is in regard to the photograph and video evidence.

 

[tsig]

This comment really has no purpose. You do not prove your innocence by finding the guilty person. That's not how it works.

I do have an opinion on this or course.

Just so everyone knows, Rudy Guede murdered Meredith Kercher. He acted alone.

And of course you can't reveal how you know that.

 

[quadraginta]

Fulcanelli,

Any thoughts on how "arbitrary publication of the acts of investigation" might apply to all these Gigs of crime scene photos and videos? This kind of concern had been at the back of my mind when the whole issue of hosting Charlie's collection came up.

I'd be interested to know more about that myself, but I have trouble associating it with Charlie's claims, although I have a premonition about that.

Charlie expressed no concerns about any legal impediments to sharing what he claimed he had, only about issues of bandwidth and storage. My premonition is that new concerns are forthcoming.

If legal barriers are an issue then quantity should not pertain. One document's unauthorized release is no less egregious than a thousand from that perspective. This sort of tactic is more commonly indictive of someone seeking a semi-plausible explanation for cherry-picking the evidence they present, and explaining the murkiness of that evidence's provenance.

If the totality of the evidence they possess is in Knox's favor (as they claim) and they are seeking a test in the court of public opinion (as Bruce has claimed) then there is no real impediment to putting all their info on the table. By offering pieces of it they have already kicked the door open. They might as well go on in. It's that first "if" which is the only logical barrier to full disclosure.

 

[tsig]

Where you you for the first trial? Did you miss the trial by media?

The judges were part of the media?

 

[Alt+F4]

Are their lawyers not good enough then? And how does your 'fighting' help them? Do you really believe you can influence the Italian Justice system? I would guess not since you have stated that you don't want to interfere with the trial, so then, what do you hope to achieve and how?

I'm thinking that sites like Bruce's exist for one purpose: fundraising. Amanda's defense team must be very expensive in addition to all the traveling her family does from the U.S. to Italy and back. I recall reading somewhere that her parents both filed for bankruptcy.

The idea is not to influence the Italian judicial system but rather to get Americans to believe she has been railroaded and contribute to her defense fund. Websites and forum posts in English will have zero effect on the trial itself but they do make it more likely sympathic Americans will head over to PayPal.