February Stundie Nominations

Travis said:
Kinda negates existence.
Click to expand...

Works with your quote that I have in my sig. :D

My nomination, from HuffPo's comment section:

Joe Stack does not strike me from his writings as psychologically disturbed. Except for one or two statements, this is not the writing of a suicide. Those one or two statements could have easily been inserted into his screed to convert him into a suicide. I find it far more believable that he was killed, strapped into his plane and then remote-controlled into the IRS building. You see, the elites have too much to gain publicity-wise from this event for this to be intentional. Constitutionalist Debra Medina has been gaining mightily on the Bilderberg incumbent governor of Texas, Rick Perry. The Texas corridor and energy taxation are absolutely key to the global agenda of pan-American consolidation and carbon taxation. This will have been designed to support Perry who is in the fight of his life from this talented, articulate constitutionalist.

Of course, as long as thre evidence is secret from the people, we (the people) can never be sure what happened here and who was responsible. Appearance is almost never reality anymore, though don't tell this to the entertainment media -- there's just too much at stake for it to be.
Click to expand...

2/18 was an inside jerb!
 
Last edited:
Dave Rogers said:
I like Mel Odious's nom, not so much for the theory itself, but for the added words in justification:



So anything anybody can imagine, including perpetual motion, homeopathy and Narnia, must have some basis in reality. Which is the classic example of the kind of 'thinking' that makes this forum necessary. Good find, Mel.

Dave
Click to expand...

Let me then add that I, for one, welcome our new Hobbit Overlords.
 
In response to pictures of the plane crash in Texas that looked like this...


austinbuilding.jpg


Oyashago says this...
Wow. That looks like more damage than what was done at the pentagon on 911.
Click to expand...
:covereyes

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=160295.840
 
Blender Head said:
I find it far more believable that he was killed, strapped into his plane and then remote-controlled into the IRS building. You see, the elites have too much to gain publicity-wise from this event for this to be intentional.
Click to expand...

So the elites did it all unintentionally? I guess that explains why their schemes are always so ridiculously convoluted.
 
Cuddles said:
So the elites did it all unintentionally? I guess that explains why their schemes are always so ridiculously convoluted.
Click to expand...



Even if you read that as just a typo, consider this:

"You see, the elites have too much to gain publicity-wise from this event..."

What exactly do they gain from this? "Our tax laws are so convoluted and unfair, they literally drove this guy insane..."

Everybody who's ever done their taxes is going to think, "Yeah, I can see that..."
 
Given that my earlier nomination MAY be a ringer, I offer this:, from the Icke forums:


Quote:
Originally Posted by netta View Post
If you are making a point or saying something is true, especially on a forum like this, then yes, you do need to back it up. Why? Basic respect. And if you have no proof that what you are saying is true, then people don't know if it's true! It's part of debate and it's part of figuring out what is "right" and "wrong." And if you want to learn the TRUTH you need evidence.

People who demand evidence can kiss my ass to be honest. We who frequent this board, and confirm for ourselves the information that David for instance shares, we resonate with that info, with our inner self.

People who don't resonate, have a blockage toward that, and to get past the blockage, they draw the evidence card.

I couldn't give a hoot that they want it. The problem lies with them, not me/us.


http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=105227&page=5
 
Last edited:
jaydeehess said:
For me, THAT'S a winner!

Best part about it is that the author probably could not even fathom why he is wrong.
Click to expand...

Agreed. "If I can't understand it you must be wrong because I'm a genius I'm a lay person but my mind has been 'freed'!"
 
Last edited:
BaaBaa said:
Given that my earlier nomination MAY be a ringer, I offer this:, from the Icke forums:


Quote:
Originally Posted by netta View Post
If you are making a point or saying something is true, especially on a forum like this, then yes, you do need to back it up. Why? Basic respect. And if you have no proof that what you are saying is true, then people don't know if it's true! It's part of debate and it's part of figuring out what is "right" and "wrong." And if you want to learn the TRUTH you need evidence.

People who demand evidence can kiss my ass to be honest. We who frequent this board, and confirm for ourselves the information that David for instance shares, we resonate with that info, with our inner self.

People who don't resonate, have a blockage toward that, and to get past the blockage, they draw the evidence card.

I couldn't give a hoot that they want it. The problem lies with them, not me/us.


http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=105227&page=5
Click to expand...


OK, that's GOTTA be a finalist...
 
Redtail said:
Agreed. "If I can't understand it you must be wrong because I'm a genius I'm a lay person but my mind has been 'freed'!"
Click to expand...

One wonders what he would make of being in a room in which a science concept is explained to several 'laypersons' and they all 'get it' except for him.

Would the science then be a fraud or would he simply be dumb?

(third choice of course,,, the others are all 'agents' and 'shills' planted there to disgrace him)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom