Merged bullet hole in the windshield of JFK's limo/ You might be...

7forever said:
They used a pumpkin which proves nothing....beyond stupid and absurd. Have someone punch you in the back of the head as hard as they can and see which way your head goes.
Click to expand...

So you know nothing about bullets.
 
The pumpkin shot vs. head punch is stundie-worthy.

The suggestions of shooting each other are probably flirting with a rule violation, just FYI for the new guy. Smileys don't change that, from what I've seen. Since he posted autopsy pictures here, I'm guessing he hasn't read those.
 
JimBenArm said:
I prefer to listen to ballistics experts rather than Texas politicians when it comes to evidence concerning gunshots. Likewise, film makers and actors generally are not among those I would seek out to provide anything serious.
But since you're not looking for evidence to actually prove anything, I guess that's okay, since that's really all you have.
Click to expand...

JOHN CONNALLY WAS THE ONLY OTHER MAN SHOT AND HE SURVIVED AND HE WAS IN THE LINE OF FIRE OF THESE BULLETS FLYING.lol Connally knew what happened and he had at least some experience with firearms.

The governor of the third largest State knew what happened and he took it to his grave with the exception of playing dumb as it concerned himself. He was willing to hang with the official story about only three shots from the rear but refused to go along with the single bullet myth.
 
Show me anything on yt that shows what you are saying could happen from a bullet travelling a thousand feet per second...to make a head thrash back in the opposite direction from which the bullet came. There is nothing and nothing has been done on this and if there has it would prove that whole common sense thing. I punch you in the face, your head is going backward...i shoot in the face your head is going backward. I throw a baseball in your face at 70 mph, your head goes back.
 
7forever said:
It's nonsense, 100 percent nonsense. Show me anything that backs up your theory. There is nothing to back it up because it's not true. How bout you give your name and address and i will ***** you in the right front of your head and see which direction it goes?:)
Click to expand...

You know you are a Kennedy Kook if... cause you have never taken your massive solid 100 percent evidence proving your are right to earn a Pulitzer Prize just like Woodward and Bernstein did.

Do you want my address too?

You know you are a Kennedy Kook if... you are offtopic in your own thread, spewing more junk about JFK.
 
7forever said:
Show me anything on yt that shows what you are saying could happen from a bullet travelling a thousand feet per second...to make a head thrash back in the opposite direction from which the bullet came. There is nothing and nothing has been done on this and if there has it would prove that whole common sense thing. I punch you in the face, your head is going backward...i shoot in the face your head is going backward. I throw a baseball in your face at 70 mph, your head goes back.
Click to expand...
the fundamental flaw in your fist and baseball analogies is both of those objects impart their energy to the head, where the bullet passes through it, imparting very little of it forward momentum

the jet effect demonstrations have been done with human cadavers as well as melons and pumpkins and show the same result
 
carlitos said:
YOUTUBE OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!1!!!1

Well, since you insist:

Melon moves towards shot

melon 2

Same experiment with human skull (realmedia .rm file - plays on VLC)

Now, will you please stop the arguments from ignorance? Slow down, stop posting junk and read some of this information. You might learn something.
Click to expand...

You are a TOOL. Those prove nothing except they blew up and the videos suck anyway. Do your own experiment with something that doesn't come apart. A human model with a skull attachement being shot with rubber bullets would prove common sense.
 
carlitos said:
YOUTUBE OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!1!!!1

Well, since you insist:

Melon moves towards shot

melon 2

Same experiment with human skull (realmedia .rm file - plays on VLC)

Now, will you please stop the arguments from ignorance? Slow down, stop posting junk and read some of this information. You might learn something.
Click to expand...
Oops physics steps in and foils the paranoid conspiracy theory of the shot through the engine-block poppycock.

Oops, another I don't believe in physics and science approach! Poor guy is an order of magnitude past most Kennedy Kooks.

You know you are a Kennedy Kook if... you fail to take experiments showing you have failed as fact. Got physics?
 
Last edited:
7forever said:
You are a TOOL. Those prove nothing except they blew up and the videos suck anyway. Do your own experiment with something that doesn't come apart. A human model with a skull attachement being shot with rubber bullets would prove common sense.
Click to expand...
why use rubber bullets? was kennedy shot with rubber bullets?
 
7forever said:
Show me anything on yt that shows what you are saying could happen from a bullet travelling a thousand feet per second...to make a head thrash back in the opposite direction from which the bullet came. There is nothing and nothing has been done on this and if there has it would prove that whole common sense thing. I punch you in the face, your head is going backward...i shoot in the face your head is going backward. I throw a baseball in your face at 70 mph, your head goes back.
Click to expand...

You know, I've been on this forum for eight years now, and I've never made a post in the CT section. Furthermore, I'm not a person who thinks about the JFK assassination. JFK CTs are not a "thing" for me. I've seen the Stone movie with the "back and to the left" piece of dialog, but never really thought about whether it was true or not.

For no particular reason, after reading this thread, I decided just for the hell of it to look up the Zapruder film on youtube and see whether JFK's head goes back or forward. Remember, now, I have no dog in this race. I don't see it as evidence for or against any conspiracy theory either way.

Here's a closeup of the Zapruder film. The head shot is around 0:20.



Now to my eye, his head very clearly goes forward for a moment at the precise instant of... ah... head explosion. After that, it goes "back and to the left".

Now, I realize this very point has surely been hashed, re-hashed, and re-re-hashed even before the days of the internet, and that mine are merely the ramblings of a JFK n00b... but it seems so clear to me that his head first goes forward.
 
What Gary Mack did accept with a gun that wouldn't destroy the head would prove the same thing as punching someone in the face. No difference. Watch Bud Dwyer kill himself on live tv back in 1987. He pulled a 357 out of a paper and shot himself in mouth. He went violently back...his head and body. What you guys are trying to pass off as truth is complete nonsense and you know it. Therein lies the real question. Why are you knowingly pushing and supporting a lie?
 
7forever said:
You are a TOOL. Those prove nothing except they blew up and the videos suck anyway. Do your own experiment with something that doesn't come apart. A human model with a skull attachement being shot with rubber bullets would prove common sense.
Click to expand...

You asked for it. I delivered it, on a veritable silver platter. You called me a "TOOL." Is this the way you plan to convince anyone that you are "right?" Because it doesn't seem like a good approach. If you would click the link, you could see the demonstration on the live goat, where the same thing happens. I didn't link it as it was too graphic but here you go. Again. On a silver platter. You are welcome. (real media .rm link) (For those not familiar, this illustrates a neuromuscular spasm)

Are you allergic to this link or what? No time to read it?


ETA - really, slooooooow down. Take a deep breath. Get away from the computer for a few hours. It will be good for you, I promise. What you are doing is not productive.
 
Last edited:
7forever said:
JOHN CONNALLY WAS THE ONLY OTHER MAN SHOT AND HE SURVIVED AND HE WAS IN THE LINE OF FIRE OF THESE BULLETS FLYING.lol Connally knew what happened and he had at least some experience with firearms.

The governor of the third largest State knew what happened and he took it to his grave with the exception of playing dumb as it concerned himself. He was willing to hang with the official story about only three shots from the rear but refused to go along with the single bullet myth.
Click to expand...

I would question how much "some experience with firearms" would help the governor judge from what direction a supersonic bullet that hit him came from. How much prior experience did he have with being shot?
 
7forever said:
Thanks for posting this.:)It shows his head going up before it violently lashed backward. His shoulders do not go forward at all. Common sense dictates that his head which is down, must go up before it goes backward. Frame 313 is a smoking gun in this case and it shows a shot enter the right front of his head.
Click to expand...

OK, I see now. You're insane. Sorry for bothering you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom