Merged bullet hole in the windshield of JFK's limo/ You might be...

THE ZFILM IS GOD IN THIS CASE

Maybe it is, and maybe it isn't. But if it is you are merely a corrupt priest trying tell everyone what the word of 'God' is.

What you have is not even remotely convincing, especially in the face of a complete lack of evidence of a 2nd (frontal) shooter.
 
He said while trolling this board.

This guy is ponked after fewer than a hundred posts. A new record.

There is no credible evidence then or now that supports either accepted gunshot, hit Kennedy from the rear. The shot at 225 was a wound of entry in the throat and the shot at 313 was a blast from the front. That's not even in dispute. Even after Bethesda it's impossible to prove their case.
 
You know you are a Kennedy Kook if...

There is no credible evidence then or now that supports either accepted gunshot, hit Kennedy from the rear. The shot at 225 was a wound of entry in the throat and the shot at 313 was a blast from the front. That's not even in dispute. Even after Bethesda it's impossible to prove their case.
You know you are a Kennedy Kook if...
- you post off-topic poppycock in your own thread about how to tell you are a Kennedy Kook.

... wow
 
Last edited:
There is no credible evidence then or now that supports either accepted gunshot, hit Kennedy from the rear. The shot at 225 was a wound of entry in the throat and the shot at 313 was a blast from the front. That's not even in dispute. Even after Bethesda it's impossible to prove their case.

So you are the one who gets to decide what evidence is credible and what is not? You must not ever lose a debate!
 
There is no credible evidence then or now that supports either accepted gunshot, hit Kennedy from the rear.

Except for, y'know, the known assassin being there, his rifle being found there. The bullets matching his rifle, the majority of people hearing the shots coming from there, the people seeing Oswald or at least the rifle. Oh, and yes the medical evidence does support a shot form the rear

Oh, and a complete lack of evidence for any other shooter in any other position
 
How long until we get my own favorite JFK CT nonsense, how no way a single man could have gotten off that many shots with a Bolt Action Rifle? Anybody who has used a Bolt Action rifle can tell you what a load of crap that is.
 
People who have been shot often don't even realize it until a moment later.
 
I think the 7 year-old is actually miffed that he came here with his You Tube videos and his conspiracy books and websites and not one of the mean old fogey skeptics who haunt these boards between episodes of House could see the obvious truth of what he was saying.

Pearls before swine ya know. :p
 
so unorganized they managed to assassinate the leader of the free world AND keep it covered up for half a century

The highest levels and all that jazz. They didn't succussfully cover it up because the film and hundreds of books proved beyond doubt that Arlen Specter was the biggest tool of the twentieth century. Their cover-up was exposed but who's gonna investigate and prosecute the highest levels of government? Nobody.;)
 
You know you are a Kennedy Kook if...

The highest levels and all that jazz. They didn't succussfully cover it up because the film and hundreds of books proved beyond doubt that Arlen Specter was the biggest tool of the twentieth century. Their cover-up was exposed but who's gonna investigate and prosecute the highest levels of government? Nobody.;)
You know you are a Kennedy Kook if...
- you make 17.66 per day in the conspiracy section and most are on JFK ...

You know you are a Kennedy Kook if...
- you post nobody will investigate the highest level of government and you forgot (or were too young to remember) the stained dress, and Watergate. lol at the highest levels of government comedy.

and don't forget the number one You know you are a Kennedy Kook if... you start a thread to tease those who can't see your delusions are the truth because they are rational critical thinking beings at a skeptics forum!!!
 
Last edited:
The highest levels and all that jazz. They didn't succussfully cover it up because the film and hundreds of books proved beyond doubt that Arlen Specter was the biggest tool of the twentieth century. Their cover-up was exposed but who's gonna investigate and prosecute the highest levels of government? Nobody.;)
so then we are back to wondering why the highest levels government cant figure out what a bullet should look like
 
People who have been shot often don't even realize it until a moment later.

Finally someone who isn't blindly attacking me.LOL What is clear to me is seeing both men react at 225. That happens visually without doubt. If a researcher is after the truth he/she will really watch Connally because he is the man to watch in the car. He throws his hands and head to his left as if a swarm of bees are about to attack his face.

He was scared out of mind because he heard the first shot miss at 147-160 and 3.5 seconds later a bullet passed his head on the left. It's in the film for anyone to see. After Kennedy receives the bullet, Connally's shot less than 3/4 of a second later from a rear shot. I really agree with you on Connally's shot because there isn't an obvious frame like that of jfk at 225 and 313 but that's what leads to research to pin down a time frame for Connally's shot.
 
You know you're Kennedy Kook...

When, in the face of overwhelming evidence your theory is wrong you defend that nonsense over and over and over.
 

Back
Top Bottom