• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Whistleblower says Guantamo "suicides" were cover up of death-by-torture

Praktik

Philosopher
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
5,244
Scott Horton has an excellent article in Harper's.

Chilling stuff.

A description of the beating given to one:

On June 9th, 2006, [Aamer] was beaten for two and a half hours straight. Seven naval military police participated in his beating. Mr. Aamer stated he had refused to provide a retina scan and fingerprints. He reported to me that he was strapped to a chair, fully restrained at the head, arms and legs. The MPs inflicted so much pain, Mr. Aamer said he thought he was going to die. The MPs pressed on pressure points all over his body: his temples, just under his jawline, in the hollow beneath his ears. They choked him. They bent his nose repeatedly so hard to the side he thought it would break. They pinched his thighs and feet constantly. They gouged his eyes. They held his eyes open and shined a mag-lite in them for minutes on end, generating intense heat. They bent his fingers until he screamed. When he screamed, they cut off his airway, then put a mask on him so he could not cry out.​

The treatment Aamer describes is noteworthy because it produces excruciating pain without leaving lasting marks. Still, the fact that Aamer had his airway cut off and a mask put over his face “so he could not cry out” is an alarming fact. This is the same technique that appears to have been used on the three deceased prisoners.
...
He asked a distraught medical corpsman what had happened. She said three dead prisoners had been delivered to the clinic. Hickman recalled her saying that they had died because they had rags stuffed down their throats, and that one of them was severely bruised. Davila told me he spoke to Navy guards who said the men had died as the result of having rags stuffed down their throats.​
And a curious coda to the story, the "suicide" prisoners were returned to their families with their necks removed:

The pathologists place the time of death “at least a couple of hours” before the bodies were discovered, which would be sometime before 10:30 p.m. on June 9. Additionally, the autopsy of Al-Salami states that his hyoid bone was broken, a phenomenon usually associated with manual strangulation, not hanging.

The report asserts that the hyoid was broken “during the removal of the neck organs.” An odd admission, given that these are the very body parts—the larynx, the hyoid bone, and the thyroid cartilage—that would have been essential to determining whether death occurred from hanging, from strangulation, or from choking. These parts remained missing when the men’s families finally received their bodies.​
Click the link for the whole story. What is most heartening here is the courage of Hickman, a proud conservative, to come forward with what he knows. The values that make torture a moral aberration are not confined to one party or pole of the spectrum: they are universal.
 
On June 9th, 2006, [Aamer] was beaten for two and a half hours straight. Seven naval military police participated in his beating. Mr. Aamer stated he had refused to provide a retina scan and fingerprints. He reported to me that he was strapped to a chair, fully restrained at the head, arms and legs. The MPs inflicted so much pain, Mr. Aamer said he thought he was going to die. The MPs pressed on pressure points all over his body: his temples, just under his jawline, in the hollow beneath his ears. They choked him. They bent his nose repeatedly so hard to the side he thought it would break. They pinched his thighs and feet constantly. They gouged his eyes. They held his eyes open and shined a mag-lite in them for minutes on end, generating intense heat. They bent his fingers until he screamed. When he screamed, they cut off his airway, then put a mask on him so he could not cry out.

If Aamer was into S&M, he wouldn't be complaining.
 
Come on, guys. Don't you know that some of life has to be mysterious?
 
Ya, well the Pentagon has already admitted to "homicides", which is their term for torturing to death...
"Homicide" is a broader term that, I think, would include "torturing to death". Do you find the term inaccurate or insufficient?
 
Well it makes it sound like the "bad apple" excuse - when such homicides are a product of an environment fostered by policy, and almost a natural consequence of opening pandora's box by legalizing torture.
 
The "whistleblower" is somebody who observed trucks going back and forth. He did not say that the suicides were cover-up of death by torture.

I note as well, the usual "they were completely innocent" claims:

The Pentagon claimed that Yasser’s frontline battle experience came from his having been a cook in a Taliban camp. Al-Zahrani said that this was preposterous: “A cook? Yasser couldn’t even make a sandwich!”

And:

Also returned to Saudi Arabia was the body of Mani Al-Utaybi. Orphaned in youth, Mani grew up in his uncle’s home in the small town of Dawadmi. I spoke to one of the many cousins who shared that home, Faris Al-Utaybi. Mani, said Faris, had gone to Baluchistan—a rural, tribal area that straddles Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan—to do humanitarian work, and someone there had sold him to the Americans for $5,000. He said that Mani was a peaceful man who would harm no one. Indeed, U.S. authorities had decided to release Al-Utaybi and return him to Saudi Arabia. When he died, he was just a few weeks shy of his transfer.

Let me ask something of the "skeptics" on this thread. If indeed the U.S. authorities had decided to release him, why would he come in for such rough treatment? Why would he even be interrogated? Just for kicks?
 
Ummm he saw a bit more than trucks - there's the whole way the "suicides" were managed by NCIS and by commanders instructing the troops on what to say - all detailed in the article.

Your question regarding their innocence, predicated on a self-serving appeal to skepticism could equally be flipped around.

Shouldn't there equally be skepticism directed to the claims of guilt?

Why was the US moving to release some of these individuals prior to the alleged suicide if they were dyed-in-the-wool terrorists?

Did dubya get off on ensuring there'd be a future threat? Or maybe there were a host of individuals picked up on hearsay in a complex environment the Americans didn't understand so when Habib turned in the guy who got the girl back in high school they took his word for it...
 
If indeed the U.S. authorities had decided to release him, why would he come in for such rough treatment? Why would he even be interrogated? Just for kicks?

Maybe - who knows? Perhaps they were suspected of being taxi drivers.

Your question is impossible to answer because we don't know which of the multitude of governmental and quasi-governmental operations, public or private, was responsible for their deaths or why they were killed.

The success of the underwear bomber, however, demonstrates just how good the vast, bloated "intelligence" machine is at synthesizing and communicating information...
 
The success of the underwear bomber, however, demonstrates just how good the vast, bloated "intelligence" machine is at synthesizing and communicating information...

Sure, one person out of 7 billion people on this earth gives us an educated view.
 
You think one incident in a world of billions gives you an educated view of a worldwide multinational "intelligence" machine. That better?
 
You think one incident in a world of billions gives you an educated view of a worldwide multinational "intelligence" machine. That better?

Well, that's how huge swathes of the world's media portrayed the latest US intelligence "cock-up".

You may now return to the thread's topic ...
 
If true, there will be some prosecutions coming...

You'd think. I don't recommend holding your breath.

In the Dilawar case, where an innocent man was tortured to death by U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan, one guy was sentenced to 2 months in a military prison. Two others were convicted, but served no time at all.

NB: this would have been criminal even if the person tortured to death were a bad guy.

And there were allegations (including autopsy reports) of other cases of detainees tortured to death that weren't prosecuted at all.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom