How many are listed as gassed? Zero.
.
And...? I'm not the one claiming that the Death Books are complete for the time periods that they cover.
Deniers are.
And at the same time they claim the majority of deaths are from typhus, which is directly contradicted by their "authoritative" source.
.
He made these statements during the interview. Read the interview again.
.
I did. And it is obvious to anyone who thinks about it for a while that he could not possibly be speaking from first hand experience, or from research with primary sources.
.
The possibility of receiving parcels and even of sending mail was discussed and documented earlier in this thread, together with facilities like hospitals, cinema's, swimming pool's, theater's, brothels, etc., etc.
.
All I've seen is unsupported claims to this effect. Do feel free to cite this "docuimentation" regarding parcels reliably being recieved by the inmates of the death camp.
And once again, your attempt to distort history, by pretending that Auschwitz was a single camp, whose facilities were equally available to all including all inmates is noted
Why do you llie like this?
.
But I thought that the Germans did the killing? You contradict yourself.
.
Really? Where have I ever stated (where has *any* normative historian) that the Germans did all the killing?
Besides that, we are not talking about killing, but the threat of being killed. And where would those rumours have come from, hmmmmn?
.
Nobody EVER made the assertion that 3 million persons were worked to death in Auschwitz. Except for you that is.
.
You can actually quote me to this effect?
So, Avey was wrong about a detail he of which had no way of having definitive knowledge. Your point?
And when can we get back to your lies about "all the evidence," your reliance on a report that was never written and quoting an interview which never took place?
.