• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

...Richard Gage destroyed by Kim Hill

Algebra34 said:
Are two different major news organizations across the world informed from the same source, or do they coincidentally make the same mistake on the same topic? Which is the debunker stance?
Click to expand...

Oh hi...

the bbc and CNN were both reading the reports off of the news wire from Reuters. Reuters reported the collapse early (so I guess they are in on it too?).

and since they didn't want to be scooped, they ran with it...
what are the other reporting errors from that horrible day.

explosions at the state department
shot down jet liners
up to 11 hijacked jets
bombs going off in the george washington bridge
a van with a mural of a jet hitting the twin towers was stopped

should we continue with what happens in the early reporting of massive confusing events?

Since the FDNY was stating from NOON that wtc7 would collapse, it doesn't matter.

But then again, when I saw the towers struck and the fires, I told my wife they would collapse. When we saw that wtc7 was on fire after being struck, I told her it would probably collapse too... I must have been in on it.

your personal incredulity is showing.
 
Algebra34 said:
Are two different major news organizations across the world informed from the same source, or do they coincidentally make the same mistake on the same topic? Which is the debunker stance?
Click to expand...

"Across the world"?? CNN is based in Atlanta but Aaron Brown was in NYC,the same city BBC America is based. Both were close to the WTC. And yes different networks do monitor each other.
 
Algebra34 said:
Who told the BBC and CNN that WTC7 had already collapsed before it did?
Click to expand...

Oh my goodness... like a rabid dog with a bone.

Reuters ran the story first. They had filed it on the wire. It was picked up and read by CNN and by the BBC.
 
Algebra34 said:
So we have no independent reporting. Thank you.
Click to expand...

There are probably a dozen indy news organizations in NYC. On 9/11 they were all doing 9/11 full time.

The prediction of the collapse of WTC7 was all over the TV and radio news by the afternoon.

I'm sorry if you are too dense to absorb this fact.
 
Algebra34 said:
So we have no independent reporting. Thank you.
Click to expand...

Independent from who or from what?

Independent from the little anti government paranoid world that you live in? Ghu I hope so.

Indepenent from each other? For the most part, except where there are limited sources for a big story, then they take the news feeds from each other (which happened on 9/11)

But in your world you think you have scored a "point" (which is irrelevant and immaterial to the issues).

It must be part of that MSM is IN ON IT TOO!!!! (how many thousands are in on it?)
 
Last edited:
It's too bad that the vast 9/11 conspiracy got every little intricate detail right and executed their plans flawlessly, except for one bbc reporter at the end of the day that had to spoil it all by jumping the gun on the WTC 7 reporting. I could just picture the conspirators breaking out the champagne, counting their millions then the bbc wtc7 report comes on, the room gets quit, the conspirators double check their conspiracy script, "This wasn't supposed to happen yet!"
 
Heh, the brain trust on 911 Blogger is claiming she is an operative. Geez, even journalists in New Zealand are in on the plot. Is there anyone who isn't part of the conspiracy?
 
But James, she is an operative. Ixnay the implesay eporterray angle.

She is NWO psyop cointelpro disoinfo...100%.

TAM:)
 
Algebra's conspiratorial excitement is all summed up magnificently by Myriad's insightful post.http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=5328204#post5328204


But do not despair. Boredom is actually a positive sign that perhaps you might be willing to engage with reality, if not presently then perhaps soon. Because in reality, the most boring answer is usually the correct one.

For example:

Question: What made that noise downstairs in the middle of the night?

Exciting (usually wrong) answer: A ninja assassin!

Boring (usually correct) answer: Water pipes contracting.

Question: Why does my shoulder hurt?

Exciting (usually wrong) answer: Referred pain from a life-threatening aortic dissection.

Boring (usually correct) answer: Pulled muscle while raking leaves.
Click to expand...
 
Btw, Gage got destroyed by this Aussie broad. I can't believe Algebra bothered pointing out the fact she didn't know anything about 9/11 (like she's supposed to or something). Obviously, she's not going to know as much about 9/11 as Gage. It just shows you that common sense ultimately prevails in these situations. She represents the average listener and Gage gained no ground for his movement by being reduced to a mere conspiracy theorist charlatan who has a million questions but no answers, no common sense, and terrible logic. She trapped him several times without having to mention microspheres, columns or any other areas of Gage's inaccurate science (which has already been debunked a million times) that average listeners don't give a crap about anyways because the ridiculous story doesn't even warrant going that far in depth.

Conclusion: Gage failed miserably. The listeners don't care about the science when the logic isn't sound. Kim Hill kept the discussion on the surface level without letting it segue into outdated science truther talking points. And for the truthers who listened and thought Gage won because he wanted to talk about his outdated, debunked science, they can just check the archives in this forum and watch his arguments fall apart.
 
Gregory, especially this last year or so, has been one of the more rational "questioners".

TAM:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom