Bigfoot Hunter at it again

Status
Not open for further replies.
Listen to the video in the OP. The reporter actually says

"When he came upon what looked like a forest"

I was directly quoting the News story!


OMG your right, LOL.....Its an undocumented forest...find of a century.

Complete with Unedited (WINK) sounds as well......I know please forward all complaints to 1-800-GET-HOAX or send an email to Flush@Kick-a-Hoax.ORG...

.....$ 5.99 a minute, all carrier rates apply.....
:D
 
Revised to say I now beleive she says 'Fort' but I do not know why she says that.
 
I think Biscardi is an interesting character. I can see why many Bigfooters don't like him. He's an unapologetic huckster like so many before him. He seems to be skilled at getting airtime. You can see that the media is amused because Bigfoot is make believe anyway.

Each time anyone gets press coverage promoting Bigfoot, it reminds the world that Bigfoot really doesn't exist. It's simply not something that is on everyones mind... that is... people either forget or never really think much about the fact that Bigfoot has never been found in over 400 years on this continent. It is simply not comparable to the mountain gorilla, okapi, saola, coelacanth, etc. There are very rational and reasonable explanations for the "scientific discovery" of those creatures. It makes sense to us why "it took so long" and missed opportunities, etc. But Bigfoot isn't like that and its proposed existence is nonsense.
 
The story is that this guy came upon this structure in the woods. The "fort". This is what he was photographing, of course, when his camera phone, unbeknownst to him, captured the bigfoot.

The claim is that bigfoot built the "fort", of course. I guarantee it's a main part of the scam to hook the believers.
 
Last edited:
The guy who took the photo looks like someone I've seen in Bigfootry.
I'll bet he is a Bigfooter, and we've seen him somewhere before.
 
Bigfoot is make believe anyway.

Excuse me? Do not jump the gun here

Bigfoot has never been found in over 400 years on this continent.

People have only been recently exploring this continent.

It is simply not comparable to the mountain gorilla, okapi, saola, coelacanth, etc. There are very rational and reasonable explanations for the "scientific discovery" of those creatures.

Of course it is. These animals were doubted, then found, especially the Gorilla. Stories of "hairy monsters stealing women" in Africa was not believed, until a body showed up

It makes sense to us why "it took so long" and missed opportunities, etc. But Bigfoot isn't like that and its proposed existence is nonsense.

I think that even some here would disagree. If it's existence is nonsense to you, why discuss it? Sure, its a cool myth, but why have 30 pages on a make-believe animal?
 
I'll bet he is a Bigfooter


He is by default. People who do not believe Bigfoot exists do not bring you pictures saying that they show Bigfoot.

I know you meant that he is an already known Bigfooter. Somebody on BFF will probably point that out if true. I doubt that he was a BF skeptic before him and the wife took the pic.

It doesn't look like a fake Bigfoot. I mean it doesn't look like a guy in a BF suit. It looks like a dead tree trunk or maybe a clump of dead leaves hanging from a branch (perspective illusion). Is this from a video? Does the "subject" move at all? Does the guy holding the camera move at all during the scene?
 
Excuse me? Do not jump the gun here



People have only been recently exploring this continent.



Of course it is. These animals were doubted, then found, especially the Gorilla. Stories of "hairy monsters stealing women" in Africa was not believed, until a body showed up



I think that even some here would disagree. If it's existence is nonsense to you, why discuss it? Sure, its a cool myth, but why have 30 pages on a make-believe animal?

Ahem

Mak said:
It is ok to consider bigfoot a cool myth, but I suggest that you do not let it take control of your life.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4750883&postcount=396

That's twice you've called it a myth. So you do not believe in bigfoot.
 
Last edited:
Do not let it take control of your life, believer or skeptic, does not matter. Why bother with an animal that you consider is Imaginary, WP? Don't give me the "well it's interesting" bull, give me the real scoop., because you obviously take pride and joy talking about footers more than bigfoot
 
Look at the profile pic of Squatchfoot at BFF
Note the age of Squatchfoot at BFF.

Is this a match?
 
Do not let it take control of your life, believer or skeptic, does not matter. Why bother with an animal that you consider is Imaginary, WP? Don't give me the "well it's interesting" bull, give me the real scoop., because you obviously take pride and joy talking about footers more than bigfoot


We do have some pretty strong evidence to suggest that bigfoot believers exist, whereas the evidence to support the notion that there really is a bigfoot is pretty darn close to non-existent. Bigfoot hunters/believers are interesting. It's a baffling phenomenon, people who are often thoroughly convinced that something is real, despite the complete lack of legitimate objective evidence for its existence. UFOs, bigfoot, psychic x-ray vision, a solid iron surface on the Sun, fundamental religiosity, they're all the same in more ways than they are different. By some definition it's delusional, yet most of these people are sane enough to hold jobs, tie their own shoes, feed themselves without dribbling on their bibs, and generally fit in as if they were regular people like you and... well... like me anyway. Yes, we are curious, very curious as to what might make otherwise sensible, normally intelligent human beings go off the deep end when it comes to their particular pet unevidenced beliefs.
 
...Of course it is. These animals were doubted, then found, especially the Gorilla. Stories of "hairy monsters stealing women" in Africa was not believed, until a body showed up...
Please will you stop repeating this footer invented "fact"?

It has been pointed out to you numerous times that this is an invention of crypto websites and that there are no scientific cites that supports this myth.
 
Please will you stop repeating this footer invented "fact"?

It has been pointed out to you numerous times that this is an invention of crypto websites and that there are no scientific cites that supports this myth.

Why would any westerner admit to being wrong about a species?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom