Moderated Views on George Galloway.

NWO Sentryman said:
AIPAC, "Zionist cancer", still propagating the "Z.O.G" theory

I think we have an antisemite here.

Oh, BTW before you go on ignore, i want you to know that Christopher Hitchens tore Galloway Apart, and so would Daniel Pipes.
Click to expand...

Oh dear. Telling the truth about a Zionist Lobby group having a big influence in the government is racist? I respectfully suggest you learn what racism is.
 
Tin Foil Timothy said:
Oh dear. Telling the truth about a Zionist Lobby group having a big influence in the government is racist? I respectfully suggest you learn what racism is.
Click to expand...

I am taking ignore off from here on.

No, you sound exactly like the White Supremacist militias of the 90s, the National Front and the BNP, with your codeword 'zionist'

I know what racism is. Look in the mirror.

Stay on topic and be civil.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NWO Sentryman said:
I am taking ignore off from here on.

No, you sound exactly like the White Supremacist militias of the 90s, the National Front and the BNP, with your codeword 'zionist'

I know what racism is. Look in the mirror.
Click to expand...

Martin Luther King would be appalled..

"When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You are talking anti-Semitism.”
 
Last edited:
Zeuzzz said:
Likewsie :D

I think more people should watch the videos in the OP, and see his full testimony. Is utter class. The senate look like they dont know what hit them.
Click to expand...

I am no admirer of Galloway,but he did make them look like utter fools.
 
Sooooooooo.....

Bringing this back to Mr Galloway and not laregely irrelivant topics....

Whats so bad about him? :D
 
dafydd said:
he did make them look like utter fools.
Click to expand...


Totally agree. Would love for someone to come up with one piece of evidence that anything he said under oath at the senate was a lie. Hitchens has said that he lied his way through the senate hearing. I have yet to see any evidence of him making one lie during. I think they would have caught him out if he did.
 
Zeuzzz said:
Totally agree. Would love for someone to come up with one piece of evidence that anything he said under oath at the senate was a lie. Hitchens has said that he lied his way through the senate hearing. I have yet to see any evidence of him making one lie during. I think they would have caught him out if he did.
Click to expand...

No-one here claimed he did. Stop making stuff up. He has lied so many other times we do not need to show he lied to the senate.
 
dafydd said:
I am no admirer of Galloway,but he did make them look like utter fools.
Click to expand...

Same here. Unfortunately there are many other circumstances of him lying and being made to look like a schoolchild with his hand in the cookie jar.
 
NWO Sentryman said:
I will let Johann Hari speak for me on this:

http://www.johannhari.com/archive/article.php?id=69

Mr Hari has an excellent track record on journalistic matters.
Click to expand...


Instead of posting a whole (largely wrong and misrepresentative) article, why not quote a bit of it? So we could discuss the bits you are referring to here.

That article has already been answered, its mainly the same old, someone accusing him of being evil as he met sadam. Yes, he did give him praise when he met him, but he was on a humanitarian visit. He was saluting the Iraqi peoples courage after the attrocities there, not Sadam himself. He was there to help the people; and happy Sadam was agreeable during his meeting.

As he said in his testimony:

"As a matter of fact, I have met Saddam Hussein exactly the same number of times as Donald Rumsfeld met him. The difference is Donald Rumsfeld met him to sell him guns and to give him maps the better to target those guns. I met him to try and bring about an end to sanctions, suffering and war, and on the second of the two occasions, I met him to try and persuade him to let Dr Hans Blix and the United Nations weapons inspectors back into the country - a rather better use of two meetings with Saddam Hussein than your own Secretary of State for Defence made of his.

"I was an opponent of Saddam Hussein when British and Americans governments and businessmen were selling him guns and gas. I used to demonstrate outside the Iraqi embassy when British and American officials were going in and doing commerce.

"You will see from the official parliamentary record, Hansard, from the 15th March 1990 onwards, voluminous evidence that I have a rather better record of opposition to Saddam Hussein than you do and than any other member of the British or American governments do."
Click to expand...



And you should check out the George Galloway/christopher Hitchens debate someone linked to beforehand.
Click to expand...


I have seen the debate, George clearly wins. Things get pretty heated though, and it was a close call with many a low blow from either side.

I think that Hitchens has lost credibility about anytyhing he says on Galloway since he claimed that he "lied his way through the senate hearing", yet clearly he did not. Or it would have been found out. Or someone would have proved it here by now.
 
Last edited:
Em, name one weapons system from the US that Rumsfeld Sold to Saddam. I am talking Hardware. Not "Bear Spares". Actual US military Hardware.

There is a great chart based on the SIPRI report on arms sales to iraq that i should dredge up somewhere.
 
Zeuzzz said:
No-one said that. So I see no reason to.
Click to expand...
George galloway said:
The difference is Donald Rumsfeld met him to sell him guns
Click to expand...
Galloway said Rumsfeld sold guns to saddam. That is a bald faced lie.

First off, if America armed saddam then why were the Iraqis equpped with standard Issue Soviet equipment such as AK-47s, T-72s etc.
 
NWO Sentryman said:
Galloway said Rumsfeld sold guns to saddam. That is a bald faced lie.
Click to expand...


Yes, he said guns, not "weapons systems".

If you want evidence of guns, then I can show that :p (and stop being so pedantic)

First off, if America armed saddam then why were the Iraqis equpped with standard Issue Soviet equipment such as AK-47s, T-72s etc.
Click to expand...


Because they were there first, they had a mixture.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom