• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

VFF and the Diaphragm Test

desertgal said:
Women don't generally include their diaphragm in their morning routine and then waltz through their day in the hope they might get lucky at some point.
Click to expand...


Thanks, desertgal. That's more or less how I had it figured.
 
Given the problems with devising a protocol with a diaphragm, why not just use something that could be easily placed into a person's orifice and easily detected, such as a a 1/2 inch steel ball bearing. A variety of orifices could be used for the test, and it would not have to be discriminatory, people of any gender could volunteer. Half of the 40 volunteers would be randomly assigned to the ball bearing group, the other half would get a placebo, which would be a 1/2 inch slice of a Hebrew National All Beef Frank.
The volunteers would express their preference for the orifice to receive the offering and a panel of judges will check said orifices for foreign material, such as small rodents, which could contaminate the test.
The claimant would have one minute to tell if the ball bearing was present in each person of not. A pass counts as a miss. The data are to be analyzed with the binomial test, with p and q = .5 and alpha < .01. Since this a one tailed test, that would be 28 correct out of 40 guesses.
 
Last edited:
Jeff Corey said:
The volunteers would express their preference for the orifice to receive the offering and a panel of judges will check said orifices for foreign material, such as small rodents, which could contaminate the test.
Click to expand...


Dammit, Lemmiwinks!
 
I admit I had to google to get the South Park reference. I feel like such a gerbil.
 
According to Wiki - "in 2002 only 0.2% of American women were using a diaphragm as their primary method of contraception"

And no wonder - they sound horrid.
 
Jonquill said:
According to Wiki - "in 2002 only 0.2% of American women were using a diaphragm as their primary method of contraception"
Click to expand...


So it does make me wonder about the chances of running into a person on the street who is currently wearing (is that the right word, wearing?) a diaphragm compared to the chances of running into a person missing a kidney. Especially considering that a person missing a kidney will be missing it 24/7, but a person with a diaphragm currently inserted at any given moment, of the very few who use one at all, and out in public for god's sake, would be, I'd guess, pretty rare.

This one will be ready for the laughing dogs soon, very soon.
 
GeeMack said:
So it does make me wonder about the chances of running into a person on the street who is currently wearing (is that the right word, wearing?) a diaphragm compared to the chances of running into a person missing a kidney. Especially considering that a person missing a kidney will be missing it 24/7, but a person with a diaphragm currently inserted at any given moment, of the very few who use one at all, and out in public for god's sake, would be, I'd guess, pretty rare.

This one will be ready for the laughing dogs soon, very soon.
Click to expand...

I'd say the chances of encountering diaphragm wearing women are very high if all one has to do to 'encounter' them is to conjure their existence up out of thin air and put them in an anecdote.

In reality? Not so much.

'Soon' has arrived. :p
 
Jonquill said:
According to Wiki - "in 2002 only 0.2% of American women were using a diaphragm as their primary method of contraception"
Click to expand...

Which is roughly about the same percentage (estimated) of people born with one kidney. What a co-winky-dink! I didn't realize the percentage of diaphragm users was so small. Besides being a ridiculous test for other reasons, it's just not practical to find test subjects. So, I guess in a way it's perfect!
 
The idea of suddenly seeing into a random stangers private parts seems quite incodceivable to me.

Seriously though what would even trigger that thought? It's almost dream like isn't it, just the randomness of it seems odd. Aside from whether you believe that what are perceiving is actually real or not.
 
Back on topic. It will be interesting if Anita posts about this latest talent and wants a protocol for a test.
 
Jonquill said:
The idea of suddenly seeing into a random stangers private parts seems quite incodceivable to me.

Seriously though what would even trigger that thought? It's almost dream like isn't it, just the randomness of it seems odd. Aside from whether you believe that what are perceiving is actually real or not.
Click to expand...

VFF told me, "The reason I saw it is because it produced a feeling of imbalance in the vibrational information of the body, like something that is not natural." As I said before, based on everything I've heard from her both publicly and privately, I get the impression that she gets a "feeling" about somebody and then her imagination creates the associated imagery. Her ghost stories, though she claims they are not related, are really examples of the same experience. She saw Ben Franklin like she wanted to see him.

The question you bring up is what I asked myself. Was there a TV show recently about diaphragms? Did it come up in conversation somehow? She told us, "It took me by surprise. I would never have expected to see that." Maybe not consciously, but how about subconsciously? I don't dream much, but whenever I do, I have always been able to associate my dreams with events or thoughts in the recent past. Sometimes it takes a while for me to realize what it was because our brains don't keep all the details of every moment in our minds.
 
bookitty said:
If this person is claiming to see a foreign object within the body of a person, there should be a less icky test. (Yes, I know "icky" isn't scientific) Pace makers, titanium bone implants and breast augmentation leap to mind.
Click to expand...
Since I sport two beautiful titanium hips, you ought to see my pelvic x-ray. Pretty scary. So if VFF can see anything foreign in the body, a large hip joint replacement unit should be it. And they are pretty common.
 
Didn't Wayne the volunteer skeptic have a diaphragm problem of a different nature?
 
What about a menstrual cup, Mooncup or similar? More women use those than do diaphragms (I have no statistics to show this, just anecdotal discussions).

However while I wouldn't object to answering a survey about sanitary protection, I would find it embarrassing to be asked "and do you have your mooncup in place right now?" in a public setting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom