She's a comic actress. She's taking the piss.
Actually she makes two interesting points-
First she's right about the flag.
IT IS rippling. Note she didn't say "waving". We all know why it's waving. (It's on a spring, which someone flicked). She says "rippling". Now whether that's a residual Wagner stress field, or whether they did "starch it that way", I have no idea, but someone went to a lot of trouble to make it look like the flag was rippling in a breeze. I never spotted that. Maybe it took a feminine eye.
I also agree with her comment that the Moon Hoax CT is a "better class" of CT than most. For a start it's hard to check. You can't just nip outside with binoculars and look for the footprints; (and the current photos as shown on BAUT won't convince anyone but a believer).
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/17/apollo-landing-sites-imaged-by-lro/
- also, our Earth evolved sense of perspective and experience of horizons let us down when we view the original pics and films.
I remember the first time I saw a programme claiming a hoax, I was rattled. I had to sit and really think about it for a while.
Anyway, I'm only going on the clip linked here, so I don't know what else she may have said, but my gut feeling is that she was stirring it for a laugh. The fact she describes the hoax CT as such suggests she is intrigued by some of the questions, but far from convinced by it.
