Moon Hoax claims on the verge of destruction

Undesired Walrus

Penultimate Amazing
Undesired Walrus
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
11,691
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/11jul_lroc.htm

In 2008* NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will carry a powerful modern camera into low orbit over the Moon's surface. Its primary mission is not to photograph old Apollo landing sites, but it will photograph them, many times, providing the first recognizable images of Apollo relics since 1972.
Click to expand...

*Note: The LROC was launched last month, not its original launch of October 2008.
 
Last edited:
"NASA faked the new pictures." :rolleyes:

"They secretly landed unmanned spacecraft that look like Apollo artifacts." :eek:

"These photographs are clear evidence of an alien civilization on the moon." :faint:
 
Last edited:
LRO flew over the Apollo 17 landing site today, not sure if it was imaged, its still in its shakedown and not in its final orbit.
 
fullflavormenthol said:
I actually go with the idea that they will claim that the pictures are fake.
Click to expand...
yeah, NASA already gave us pictures (and videos, and rocks) from the moon and that didnt convince the CTers, why would you think a new batch of pictures would convince them?
 
Largely dead anyway. The counter arguments and evidence is just too easy to find these days.
 
Way too optimistic, Walrus.
The Moonbats will just scream "Fake!" as several people have already noted.
 
I agree. Not only will some cry "fake", I bet some will also go so far as to suggest it was purposely set up all for the purposes of reinforcing the moon landing "myth", because so many people are waking up to the "truth".
 
It's not like Hardcore Conspiracy Kooks are into being convinced by evidence. If they were, they would probably not be Conspiracy Kooks.
And the Moonbats are almost all Hardcore.
 
For some reason I thought this was an ESA mission. Must not have read my OP well.

Yes, they probably will scream 'NASA fake'.

That said, if NASA did fake it, how did they not count on something like the LROC (Or a manned mission) being launched by the Soviet Union, being unable to photograph the landers, promptly humiliating the US and winning a large chunk of the newly disenchanted world over to communism?
 
Last edited:
Undesired Walrus said:
That said, if NASA did fake it, how did they not count on something like the LROC (Or a manned mission) being launched by the Soviet Union, being unable to photograph the landers, promptly humiliating the US and winning a large chunk of the newly disenchanted world over to communism?
Click to expand...

Exactly..and the Russians openly stated that thy were tracking each of the Apollo missions at the time.

Much momentum has been lost since the death of Bill Kaysing, the chief architect of the madhouse. Although, like many conspiracry theories, he created a very lucrative outlet.
 
So here's how my day went yesterday:

Went to work. Went to the Twins game, which they lost to the White Sox 8-7.

Oh, and met Buzz Aldrin.

He was signing his book at the Mall of America. No one was punched while I was there.
 
Jiddu said:
Exactly..and the Russians openly stated that thy were tracking each of the Apollo missions at the time.

Much momentum has been lost since the death of Bill Kaysing, the chief architect of the madhouse. Although, like many conspiracry theories, he created a very lucrative outlet.
Click to expand...

Wow, that Kaysing guy believed Apollo 1's fire and the Challenger disaster was a conspiracy?

Kaysing also claimed that NASA staged both the Apollo 1 fire and the Challenger accident, deliberately murdering the astronauts on board. He suggested that NASA might have learned that these astronauts were about to expose the conspiracy and needed to guarantee their silence.
Click to expand...

Source

Isn't that a well-worn claim made by conspiracists in almost every other situation to 'keep people silent'?

I wonder what he thought of the Columbia crash. :covereyes
 
Come on, "they" can get all the worlds engineers (including unfriendly countries) to keep quiet on 9/11 and got the soviet union to collaborated on the moon hoax.
How difficult would it be to fake some more pictures?:D
 
Whiplash said:
I agree. Not only will some cry "fake", I bet some will also go so far as to suggest it was purposely set up all for the purposes of reinforcing the moon landing "myth", because so many people are waking up to the "truth".
Click to expand...

Wouldn't it be easier to get all of the people who are waking up to the truth in the same phone booth and blow it up?
 
CORed said:
I don't know. That might be too logical for moonhoaxers. I think they might go with the alien civilization explanation.
Click to expand...
You have a point. I'll go ahead and make up a CT myself (you'll see it here first folks).

Flavor's fake CT
Okay. So...the Reptilians have had a moon base for thousands of years (ever wonder why the moon factors into so much mythology? Um?) {Cue X-Files theme} So the Catholic Church has been aware of the Reptilians for years (which is the secret real reason the Church was formed), and have been secretly holding them in check. Eventually though the Reptilians created the Protestant Reformation to strip power from Catholic church to influence the government, hence the taking away the Catholic Churches ability to counter balance the Reptilian monarchies. So the Catholic church was defeated in terms of being an effective force agains the Reptilians, and despite killing certain high profile Reptilians (like Abraham Lincoln) they could never really strike hard enough to really hold the Reptilians back.

The was until they were able to get one of their own in the White House, you see Kennedy was a secret Vatican Jesuit operative sent to start a mission to the moon to strike at the Reptilian base. None of the Apollo missions ever made it to the moon, they were really attacks against the Reptilian moon base! You see you don't know because a truce was reached, and this stalemate meant that neither the Catholic Church nor Reptilians will ever attain too much power. Futurama hints at the by showing the Space Pope as a Reptile, hence the Reptile-Catholic Alliance.

"They" (The Lizard Catholics) have already planted a fake landing sight to cover up the space war and to hide the Space Vatican.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

So I wonder if my CT would take off if I poseted it at the Icke forums or ATS forums. :D
 
If I may indulge in the slightest moment of woo, in my life I've seen a pile of snapshots in my time and the best of the Moon photos are remarkably clear and good for being the products of amateurs.

There. That's out of my system, since a Hasselblad shooting 120 film leaves a lot of spare pixels grains of silver that can be sacrificed to the cropping process. And the most striking thing about them is how CLEAR they are. We think of air as being invisible, but on Earth it and what it contains are always there, reflecting and refracting light.
 
dropzone said:
If I may indulge in the slightest moment of woo, in my life I've seen a pile of snapshots in my time and the best of the Moon photos are remarkably clear and good for being the products of amateurs.
Click to expand...

If I recall, Nasa has a web site where you can see ALL of the pictures, including the messed up ones
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom